Kinetics and Trophic Role of Bacterial Degradation of Macro-Algae in Antarctic Coastal Waters

  • W. Reichardt
  • G. Dieckmann

Summary

Aerobic formation of detritus from debris of the Antarctic Kelp, Himantothallus grandifolius, yielded amounts of carbon and nitrogen 2 and 4 times higher, respectively, than fresh algae, and a concomitant decrease of the carbon:nitrogen ratio from 19 to approximately 10. These changes were achieved only in the presence of the indigenous Antarctic bacterio-flora. During formation of detritus from the Antarctic red alga, Leptosomia simplex, C:N ratios may drop even below the Redfield ratio reported for phytoplankton. The increases in the C and N contents of the debris and its colonization by epiphytic bacteria were characterized by saturation kinetics, which showed an initial lag, subsequent steep increment, and a final stationary phase. During its exponential phase, rates of bacterial colonization of debris from brown and red algae were comparable to those calculated for kelp in areas of temperate climates. There is preliminary evidence that some of the enzymes, which participate in the decomposition of the particulate detrital matter, are optimally adapted to the temperature regime of a permanently cold environment. The results obtained favour the idea that the formation of macro-algal detritus in Antarctic coastal waters is as efficient as in temperate regions. Preliminary assessments indicated that partly degraded thalli from both the brown and red algae were preferred over fresh thalli, as a food source, by intertidal amphipods.

Keywords

Biomass Phytoplankton Immobilization Biodegradation Beach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amy PS, Pauling C, Morita RY (1983) Starvation-survival processes of a marine Vibrio sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 45: 1041–1048PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson Mi, Smith SV (1983) C:N:P ratios of benthic marine plants. Limnol Oceanogr 28: 568–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baross JA, Morita RY (1978) Microbial life at low temperatures: Ecological aspects. In: Kushner DJ (ed) Microbial life in extreme environments. Academic, London, p 9–71Google Scholar
  4. Bird KT, Habig C, DeBusk T (1982) Nitrogen allocation and storage patterns in Gracilaria tikvahiae (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 18:344–348Google Scholar
  5. Christian RR, Wetzel RL (1978) Interaction between substrate, microbes and consumers of Spartina detritus in estuaries. In: Wiley ML (ed) Estuarine Interactions. Academic, New York pp 93–144Google Scholar
  6. Cundell AM, Sleeter TD, Mitchell R (1977) Microbial populations associated with the surface of the brown alga Ascophyllum nodosum. Microb Ecol 4: 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dieckmann G, Reichardt W, Zielinski K (1985) Growth and production of the seaweed, Himantothallus grandifolius, at King George Island. In: Siegfried WR, Condy PR, Laws RM (eds) Antarctic nutrient cycles and food webs (Proceedings of the 4th SCAR symposium on Antarctic Biology). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Haines EB, Hanson RB (1979) Experimental degradation of detritus made from the salt marsh plants Spartina alterniflora L., and Juncus roemeriana Scheele. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 40: 27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanson RB (1982) Organic nitrogen and caloric content of detritus. II Microbial biomass and activity. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 14: 325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koop K, Newell RC, Lucas ML (1982) Biodegradation and carbon flow based on kelp (Ecklonia maxima) debris in a sandy beach. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 7: 315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Linley EAS, Newell RC, Bosma SA (1981) Heterotrophic utilisation of mucilage released during fragmentation of kelp (Ecklonia maxima and Laminaria pallida). I. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 4: 31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lucas MI, Newell RC, Velimirov B (1981) Heterotrophic utilisation of mucilage released during fragmentation of kelp (Ecklonia maxima and Laminaria pallida). II. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 4: 43–55Google Scholar
  13. Mann KH (1973) Seaweeds: Their productivity and strategy for growth. Science 182: 975–981PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marinucci AC (1982) Carbon and nitrogen fluxes during decomposition of Spartina alterniflora in a flow-through percolator. Biol Bull 162: 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Newell RC, Lucas MI (1981) The quantitative significance of dissolved and particulate organic matter released during fragmentation of kelp in coastal waters. Kieler Meeresforsch Sonderh 5: 336–369Google Scholar
  16. Newell RC, Lucas MI, Velimirov B, Seiderer LJ (1980) The quantitative significance of dissolved organic losses following fragmentation of kelp (Ecklonia maxima and Laminaria pallida). Mar Ecol Progr Ser 2: 45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Reichardt W, Morita RY (1982) Survival stages of a psychrotrophic Cytophaga johnsonae strain. Can J Microbiol 28: 841–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Robinson JD, Mann KH, Novitsky JA (1982) Conversion of the particulate fraction of seaweed detritus to bacterial biomass. Limnol Oceanogr 27: 1072–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stuart V (1982) Limitations of ATP as a measure of microbial biomass. S Afr Tydskr Dierkd 17: 93–95Google Scholar
  20. Thayer GW, Engel DW; Lacroix W (1977) Seasonal distribution and changes in the nutritive quality of living, dead and detrital fractions of Zostera marina. J E M Biol Ecol 30: 109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Velimirov B, Ott JA, Novak R (1981) Microorganisms on macrophyte debris. Kieler Meeresforsch Sonderh 5: 333–344Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Reichardt
    • 1
  • G. Dieckmann
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für MeereskundeUniversität KielKielGermany
  2. 2.Alfred-Wegener-Institut für PolarforschungColumbus-CenterBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations