Skip to main content

Stability of Hydrated M +1 -DNAs: A Challenge in the Theory of Nonlinear Systems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Statics and Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences ((SSSOL,volume 47))

  • 146 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we give an outlook on the problem pertinent to the structural stability of hydrated double-stranded (duplex) M +1 -DNA salts (M +1 stands for a monovalent counterion like Na+, K+, Rb+) in fibers and possibly in solutions. In particular we call attention to the processes which may occur at the interface between the polyion and its aqueous surroundings and to their relations with external control parameters like water activity aw and ionic strength I.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pleasant reading is Watson’s book: Molecular Biology of the Gene, W.A. Benjamin Inc. (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for instance, the masterpiece by Hess’s group at the Max Planck Institut of Dortmund (Germany); for a recent review, see: G. Gerisch, B. Hess: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 71, 2118 (1974)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. See, for instance: M.G. Rutten: In The Origin of Life by Natural Causes (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.I. Oparin: In Genesis and Evolutionary Development of Life (Academic, New York 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  5. See, for instance: M. Eigen, P. Schuster: In The Hypercycle (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1979)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Nicolis, I- Prigogine: Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems (Wiley, New York, London, Sydney, Toronto 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Haken: In Synergetics: An Introduction (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1978) and in books of his Synergetics Series

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Del Giudice et al.: Phys. Lett. 85A, 402 (1982);

    Google Scholar 

  9. see also: Coherent Excitations of Biological Systems, ed. by H. Fröhlich, F. Kremer (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Levitt: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 640 (1978)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. See also M. Sundaralingam, E. Westhoff: In Biomolecular Stereodynamics (Adenine Press 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henry M. Sobell: In Nucleic Acid Geometry and Dynamics (Pergamon Press, New York 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Struther Arnott, Rengaswami Chandrasekaran: In Biomolecular Stereodynamics (Adenine Press, New York 1981, and references therein)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richard E. Dickerson et al.: Science 216, 475 (1982) and references therein

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. De Santis et al.: Biopolymers 20, 1707 (1981) and references therein

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Falk et al.: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84, 3843 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Clementi, G. Corogiu: In Biomolecular Stereodynamics (Adenine Press New York 1981);

    Google Scholar 

  18. see also: Structure and Dynamics: Nucleic Acids and Proteins (Adenine Press, New York 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  19. B.N. Conner et al.: Nature (London) 295, 294 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. See, for instance: Madeleine Lüscher-Mattle: Biopolymers 21, 419 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A.G.W. Leslie et al.: J. Mol. Biol. 143, 49 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. See, for instance: A. Katchalsky: In Macromolecules. IUPAC Symposium (Butterworths, London 1971) and references therein;

    Google Scholar 

  23. see also: M. Guéron, G. Weisbuch: Biopolymers 19, 353 (1980);

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. and F. Oosawa: In Polyelectrolytes (Dekker Inc., New York 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Clementi: In Structure and Dynamics: Nucleic Acids and Proteins (Adenine Press, New York 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Zakrzewska et al.: In Biomolecular Stereodynamics (Adenine Press, New York 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  27. The shell-mode coupling involving asymmetric stretching and symmetric bending certainly affects the P-01, P-02 double-bond character, but it is expected not to affect directly the backbone conformation as far as the negative charge delocalization concerns only the two “pendent” oxygens. If, however, such delocalization would involve ester oxygens, a change in dihedral angles α and ζ will then affect the resonance integrals in the π-like system of orbitals of the whole phosphate group, so that an (α,ζ)-dependent energy term would appear. Of course, the actual situation will depend on the strength and symmetry of the ligand fields (absorbed water molecules and possibly coordinated counterions). This state of affairs may be tentatively approached in terms of a mean field theory following the same method as in ferroelectrics. (See, for instance, M. Tokunaga, M. Matsubara: Progr. Theor. Phys. 35, 581 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. N.C. Seeman: In Nucleic Acid Geometry and Dynamics (Pergamon, New York 1979) Sarma ed. Furthermore, the A conformation should favour at low aw the onset of salt bridges between neighbouring phosphate groups on opposite strands

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Wittenburg: In Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies (Teubner, Stuttgart 1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. During the elaboration of the present analysis we became aware of the work of De Santis (see Ref. [10]) where the same type of argument is employed

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. In the rough approximation in which β is kept constant at “trans” (t) position (β~180°), Eq. (14) would also imply cosγ = 0, or cosγ = -1. The former solution may be ascribed to both g+ or g- ranges; if ascribed to g+, this result appears to be consistent with the experimental observation (see Sect.2). Furthermore, the constancy of both β and γ implying two more equations (contraints) among α,ε,ζ allows one to choose ζ as relevant conformational parameter. Of course, for fixed δ, the other parameters become functions of the free ζ.

    Google Scholar 

  32. It appears that the stability of the water spine in the m.g. depends on base sequence, it is then a problem which should be treated in the framework of DNA genetic-dependent properties (see the introductory section)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Alternatively, by remembering the strict relation existing between sugar puckering and pseudorotation, one may think of a situation in which the energy barrier for (C2′-endo)→(C3′-endo) transition of sugar is controlled by the fluctuations in phosphate-group rotation ζ and, vice versa, the energy barrier for (t)→(g+) transition of phosphate group rotation ζ is controlled by fluctuations in sugar pseudorotation. Such a situation should be formally similar to that of dynamic barriers occurring in proteins, as suggested by H. Frauenfelder: Biochemistry 23, 5147 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  34. See, for instance: H.E. Stanley: J. Phys. A12, 1329 (1979);

    Google Scholar 

  35. see also: E. Stoll, C. Domb: J. Phys. A12, 1843 (1979)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. E. Clementi: In Lecture Notes in Chemistry, Vol.19 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fumio Oosawa: In Polyelectrolytes (Dekker, New York 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  38. See, for instance: T.L. Hill: Introduction to Statistical Thermodynamics (Addison-Wesley 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  39. See, for instance: H. Teitelbaum, S.W. Englander: J. Mol. Biol. 92, 79 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Note that the relation of Eq. (25) with second-order differential entropy ‘(see, for instance: Nicolis and Prigogine, Ref. [4] is trivial: \( {({\delta^2}S)_0} \equiv - (1/T)\sum\limits_{{ij}} {{{({\partial^2}G/\partial {\xi_i}\partial {\xi_j})}_0}\partial {\xi_i}\partial {\xi_j}} \) where the subscript (0) denotes “reference state” and {∂ξj} stands for the order parameters ζ,σ,ξ,θAB1B2; further considerations on kinetic properties of fluctuations, namely terms involving ∇ξj(Z,r,φ;t), would lead us to the wanted relaxation equations, at least for regimes near to equilibrium

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nardelli, G.F., Bracale, M., Signorini, C., Zucchelli, G. (1983). Stability of Hydrated M +1 -DNAs: A Challenge in the Theory of Nonlinear Systems. In: Benedek, G., Bilz, H., Zeyher, R. (eds) Statics and Dynamics of Nonlinear Systems. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, vol 47. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82135-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82135-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-82137-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-82135-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics