• Howard Kunreuther
  • Eryl Ley


The term risk analysis has generated considerable controversy in recent years as to its meaning and importance with respect to societal decision making. The papers and especially the discussions included in this volume illuminate different aspects of this risk debate. The participants represent diverse disciplinary backgrounds, but all of them have an interest in the decision process and institutional aspects of risk.


Corn Petroleum Defend Stake 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ackerman, B., Rosa-Ackerman, S., Sawyer, J., and Henderson, D. (1974) The Uncertain Search for Environmental Quality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, G.T. (1971) Essence of Decision. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Behn, R.D. (1981) Policy analysts and policy politicians. Policy Analysis 6 (2): 21–46.Google Scholar
  4. Holling, C.S. (1981) Science for Public Policy: Highlights of Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. R-23. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  5. Kunreuther, H., and Lathrop, J. (1982) Hazardous facilities: siting lessons from LNG. Risk Analysis (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Kunreuther, H., Lathrop, J., and Linnerooth, J. (1982) A Descriptive Model of Choice for Siting Facilities. WP-82–18. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.Google Scholar
  7. Lathrop, J., and Linnerooth, J. (1982) The role of risk assessment in a political decision process, in: P. Humphreys and A. Vari (Eds.) Analyzing and Aiding Decision Processes. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  8. Nelkin, D., and Pollack, M. (1979) Public participation in technological decisions: reality or grand illusion. Technology Review, September pp55–64.Google Scholar
  9. O’Hare, M. (1977) Not on my block you don’t: Facility siting and the strategic importance of compensation. Public Policy 25:409–58.Google Scholar
  10. Simon, H. (1967) The changing theory and changing practice of public administration, in: I. de Sola Pool (Ed.) Contemporary Political Science: Toward Empirical Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vaupel, J.W. (1981) Truth and consequences: some roles for scientists and analysts in environmental decision-making, in: W.A. Magat (Ed.) Improving Environmental Regulation. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  13. Wildavsky A. (1981) Rationality in writing: Linear and curvilinear. Journal of Public Policy 1:25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg/Austria 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard Kunreuther
    • 1
  • Eryl Ley
    • 1
  1. 1.International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria

Personalised recommendations