Abstract
The title of this paper was consciously chosen to be provocative: both authors believe the concept of the unconscious wish for a child to be a realistic one. What we wish to pass critical remarks on, is, therefore, not so much the concept itself, but rather on an inflationary and — we believe — unqualified and unrealistic usage in the gynecological practice and research, whereby other concepts that are fundamental for giving contraceptive adivce could thereby be ignored.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Oeter K (1979) Rationales Entscheiden: Zweck-Mittel-Orientierungen beim Vorsorgeverhalten. In: Mackensen R, Sagebiel F (eds) Soziologische Analysen. Referate aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie und der ad-hoc-Gruppen beim 19. Deutschen Soziologentag, Berlin, 17.-20 April 1979, pp 224–227
Wilken M, Oeter K (1979) Zur Frage der Vermeidbarkeit unerwünschter Schwangerschaften. In: Lüth P (ed) Frau und Medizin, Hippokrates Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 187–215
Sandberg EC, Jacobs RI (1971) Psychology of the misuse and rejection of contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110 (2): 237
Tunnadine D, Green R (1978) Unwanted pregnancy: accident or illness? University Press, Oxford
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wilken, M., Oeter, K. (1982). Contraception as Social Action: A Criticism of the Concept of the Unconscious Wish for a Child. In: Prill, HJ., Stauber, M., Pechatschek, PG. (eds) Advances in Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81876-9_95
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81876-9_95
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-11710-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81876-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive