Measurement of Monotypism in Atherosclerosis

  • K. T. Lee
  • W. A. Thomas
  • C. D. Murray
  • K. Janakidevi
Conference paper

Abstract

In 1973, Dr. Earl Benditt and his associate reported extremely interesting and provocative findings in regard to the origin of atherosclerotic lesions (1). These investigators have been studying atherosclerotic lesions in autopsy specimens from black women who were heterozygous for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PD), using techniques that had been developed for investigating the origin of neoplasms. They found many advanced atherosclerotic lesions are monotypic or at least have monotypic foci. With these findings they concluded that each atherosclerotic lesion probably arose from a single, genetically transformed cell and thus constituted a single clone (monoclonal origin). This had been shown to be the case for leiomyomas and for certain other neoplasms. The obvious inference to be drawn was that atherosclerotic lesions were in fact neoplasms. Since then many observations have been made on this phenomenon in a number of laboratories including ours. We have studied similar atherosclerotic lesions with monotypic foci and have concluded, from similar data to those reported by Dr. Benditt and his associate that the observed monotypism has causes other than monoclonism and hence it does not indicate monoclonal origin of the lesions (2).

Keywords

Cholesterol Electrophoresis Leiomyomas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benditt EP, Benditt JM (1973) Evidence for a monoclonal origin of human atherosclerosis plaques. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 1753–1756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas WA, Reiner JM, Janakidevi K, Florentin RA and Lee KT (1979) Population dynamics of arterial cells during atherogenesis. X. Study of monotypism in atherosclerotic lesions of black women heterozygous for glucose-6–phosphate dehydrogenase. Exp. Mol. Path. 31: 367–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lyon MF (1962) Sex chromatin and gene action in the mammalian X- chromosome. Amer. J. Hum. Genet. 14: 135–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zavala C, Herner G, and Fialkow PJ (1978) Evidence for selection in cultured diploid fibroblast strains. Exp. Cell Res. 117: 137–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ohno S, Poole J, and Gustavsson I (1965) Sex-linkage of erythrocyte glucose-6–phosphate dehydrogenase in two species of wild hares. Science 150: 1737–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee KT, Thomas WA, Janakidevi K, Kroms M, Reiner JM, and Borg KY (1981) Mosaicism in female hybrid hares heterozygous for glucose- 6–phosphate dehydrogenase. I. General properties of a hybrid hare model with special reference to atherogenesis. Exp. Mol. Path. „34: 191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janakidevi K, Lee KT, Thomas, WA, Reiner JM, and Murray CD (1981) Mosaicism in female hybrid hares heterozygous for glucose-6–phosphate dehydrogenase. II. Changes in the ratios of G-6–PD types in skin fibroblast cultures carried through multiple passages. Exp. Mol. Path. 34: 202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murray CD, Lee KT, Thomas WA, Reiner JM, and Janakidevi K (1981) Mosaicism in female hybrid hares heterozygous for glucose-6–phosphate dehydrogenase. III. Chnages in the ratios of G-6–PD types in skin fibroblast cultures exposed to 2 5–hydroxycholesterol. Exp. Mol. Path. 34: 209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sinensky M (1977) Isolation of a mammalian cell mutant resistant to 25–hydroxycholesterol. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 78: 863–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. T. Lee
  • W. A. Thomas
  • C. D. Murray
  • K. Janakidevi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations