Advertisement

Häufige und seltene Kontaktallergene

  • Björn M. Hausen
Conference paper
Part of the Verhandlungen der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft book series (VDGDERMATOLOGIE, volume 32)

Zusammenfassung

Die Zahl der niedermolekularen Verbindungen, die als Berufs- und Umweltnoxen eine allergische Kontaktdermatitis verursachen können, ist fast unübersehbar groß. Die Induktion einer Kontaktsensibilisierung wird im wesentlichen durch drei Faktoren bestimmt:
  1. 1.

    Exposition, d. h. Dauer und Intensität der Einwirkung des Allergens

     
  2. 2.

    Prädisposition des Organismus, auf den das Allergen einwirkt

     
  3. 3.

    Sensibilisierungspotenz des Allergens.

     

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    Alfonzo C (1979) Allergic contact dermatitis to isopropylaminodiphenylamin (IPPD). Contact Dermatitis 5: 145–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Audebert C, Lamoureux P (1978) Eczéma professionnel du marin pêcheur par contact de bryozoaires en baie de Seine. Ann Dermatol Venereol 105: 187–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    Bang Pedersen N, Thormann J, Senning A (1980) Occupational contact allergy to bis-(4-chlorophenyl)methyl chloride. Contact Dermatitis 6: 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 5.
    Bonnevie P (1948) Fishermen’s Dogger bank itch, an allergic contact eczema due to the coralline Alcyonidium hirsutum. Acta Allergol 1: 40–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 6.
    Borelli S (1979) Neuere Berufsdermatosen. Fortschr Prakt Dermatol Venerol 9: 261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    Bork K, Heise D, Rosinus A (1979) Formaldehyd in Haarshampoos. Derm Beruf Umwelt 27: 10–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    Brandrup F, Schultz Larsen F (1979) Nickel dermatitis provoked by bottom in blue jeans. Contact Dermatitis 5: 148–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.
    Brun R (1975) Statistique des tests épicutanés positifs de 1000 cas d’eczéma de contacts. Dermatologica 150: 193–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 10.
    Brun R (1979) Nickel in food: The role of stainless-steel utensils. Contact Dermatitis 5: 43–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 11.
    Calnan CD (1979) Allergy to dipentene in paint thinner. Contact Dermatitis 5: 123–124Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Camarasa JMG (1979) First epidemiological study of contact dermatitis in Spain–1977. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh) [Suppl 89] 59: 34–37Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christensen OB, Möller H (1978) Release of nickel from cooking utensils. Contact Dermatitis 4: 343–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christensen OB, Möller H, Andrasko L, Lagesson V (1979) Nickel concentration of blood, urin and sweat after oral administration. Contact Dermatitis 5: 312–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cimino G, de Stefano S, Minale C (1972) Prenylated quinones in marine sponges: Ircinia sp. Experientia 28: 1401–1402Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conde-Salazar L, Garcia Diez A, Rafeensperger F, Hausen BM (1980) Contact allergy to the Brazilian rosewood substitute Machaerium scleroxylon TUL. ( Pao ferro ). Contact Dermatitis 6: 246–250Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cronin E (1979) Oil of turpentine–a disapearing allergen. Contact Dermatitis 5: 308–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cronin E (1980) Lipstick dermatitis due to propyl gallate. Contact Dermatitis 6: 213–214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dubos M et al. (1977) Alcyonidium gelatinosum et réactions cutanées d’hypersensitivité. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Fi-hales 70: 82–89Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fisher AA (1978) The atlas of aquatic dermatology. Grune & Stratton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Forck G (1978) Fingerekzem beim Zahnarzt. Ursache, Diagnostik, Therapie. Zahnaerztl Welt 87: 726–731Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fraser JH, Lyell A (1963) Dogger bank itch. Lancet I: 63Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fregert S et al. (1969) Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc 55: 17–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Sandahl E (1979) Reduction of chromate in cement by iron sulfate. Contact Dermatol 5: 39–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fregert S, Kollander M, Poulsen J (1979) Allergic contact stomatitis from gold dentures. Contact Dermatol 5: 63–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guldager A (1959) Dogger bank itch. Legeskr Laeg 41: 1567–1571Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hammershey O (1980) Standard patch test results in 3225 consecutive Danish patients from 1973–1977. Contact Dermatitis 6: 263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Happle R, Kalveram KJ, Büchner U, Echternacht-Happle K, Goggelmann W, Summer K-H (1980) Contact allergy as a therapeutic tool for alopecia areata. Dermatologica 161: 289–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 29.
    Hausen BM (1978) Berufsbedingte Kontaktdermatitiden durch Pflanzen und Hölzer. Arbeitsmed Sozial med Praeventivmed 13: 161–166Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    Hausen BM (1980) Arnikaallergie. Hautarzt 31: 10–17Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    Hausen BM (to be published) Woods injurious to health. Gruyter, Berlin New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. 32.
    Hausen BM, Schulz KH (1978) Allergische Kontaktdermatitis durch Löwenzahn ( Taraxacum officinale Wiggers ). Derm Beruf Umwelt 26: 198Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    Hausen BM, Stute J (to be published) Diphenylcyclopropenon - a strong contact sensitizer. Chem IndGoogle Scholar
  33. 35.
    Hjorth N, Fregert S, Magnusson B (1979) Einige Berufe und ihre Kontaktallergene. Allergologie 2: 296–297Google Scholar
  34. 36.
    Ippen H (1980) Contact reactions to different types and derivates of woolwax. 5th International Symposium on Contact Dermatitis, Barcelona, Spain, 28–30. 3. 1980 p 72Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Kaaber K, Veien NK, Tjell JC (1978) Low nickel diet in the treatment of patients with chronic nickel dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 98: 197–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 38.
    Kiefer M (1979) Nickel sensitivity: Relationships between history and patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 5: 398–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 39.
    Kleinhans D, Dayss U (1980) Aktuelles zur Formaldehyd-Kontaktallergie. Derm Beruf Umwelt 28: 101–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 40.
    Kuckuck P (1974) Der Strandwanderer, 11. Aufl. Lehmann, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  39. 41.
    Lämmer D (1979) Testergebnisse von 1008 Patienten mit Kontaktallergie. Z Hautkr 54: 571–579Google Scholar
  40. 42.
    Lambert D, Lacroix M, Journet F, Chapuis J-L (1978) L’allergie cutanée à l’épichlorhydrine. Ann Dermatol Venereol 105: 521–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 43.
    Laubstein H, Mönnich H-T (1980) Zur Epidemiologie der Berufsdermatosen. III. Dermatol Monatsschr 166: 368–381Google Scholar
  42. 44.
    Leyden JJ, Kligman AM (1979) Contact dermatitis to neomycin sulfate. JAMA 242: 1276–1278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 45.
    Ludwig H, Hausen BM (1977) Sensitivity to isopropyl alcohol. Contact Dermatol 3: 240–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 46.
    Magnusson B, Blohm S-V, Fregert S, Hjorth N, Hovding G, Pirilä V (1968) Routine patch testing. IV. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh) 48: 110–114Google Scholar
  45. 47.
    Meneghini CL (1972) Cases of sea-urchin granuloma with positive tests to spines extracts. Contact Dermatitis 12: 316Google Scholar
  46. 48.
    Menné T, Bachmann E (1979) Permanent disability from skin diseases. Derm Beruf Umwelt 27: 37–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 49.
    Miranda A, Quinones PA (1980) Allergic contact sensitization to copper. 5th International Symposium Contact Dermatitis, Barcelona, 28.-30. 3. 1980, p 26Google Scholar
  48. 50.
    Mitchell JC, Rook A (1979) Botanical dermatology. Greengrass, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  49. 51.
    Moore RE, Higa T, Scheuer PJ (1966) Isolation of eleven new spinochromes from echinoids of the genus echinthrix. J Org Chem 31: 3645–3650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 52.
    Mortensen T (1979) Allergy to lanolin. Contact Dermatitis 5: 137–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 53.
    Newhouse ML (1966) Dogger bank itch. Br Med J I: 1142–1145Google Scholar
  52. 54.
    Noster U, Hausen BM, Krische H, Schulz KH (1976) Squaricacid-diethylester–a strong sensitizer. Contact Dermatitis 2: 99–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 55.
    Pashkevich IAA (1979) Zur Frage der Ätiologie der Entstehung von Hauterkrankungen durch Kontakt mit blaugrünen Algen (in Russisch). Vestn Dermatol Venerol 47–51Google Scholar
  54. 56.
    Peltonen L (1979) Nickel sensitivity in the genral population. Contact Dermatitis 5: 27–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 57.
    Pevny I, Schäfer U (1980) Äthylendiamin-Allergie. Derm Beruf Umwelt 28: 35–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 58.
    Rascheja-Kotelba B, Choezka, Karas A, Preisler A (1979) Über die Erkrankungen der Haut bei Fischern (in Russisch). Vestn Dermatol VenerolGoogle Scholar
  57. 59.
    Reynolds, Rodriguez E (1979) Geranylhydroquinone: A contact allergen from trichomes of phacelia crenulata. Phytochemistry 18: 1567–1568Google Scholar
  58. 60.
    Reynolds G, Epstein W, Terry D, Rodriguez E (1980) A potent contact allergen of phacelia (hydrophyllaceae). Contact Dermatitis 6: 272–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 61.
    Rocha G, Fraga S (1962) Sea urchin granuloma of the skin. Arch Dermatol 85: 406–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 62.
    Rudner EJ (1978) Diagnosis of allergic eczematous contact dermatitis. Int J Dermatol 17: 398–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 63.
    Schmalle H, Hausen BM (1979) A new sensitizing quinone from lady slipper (cypripedium calceolus). Naturwissenschaften 66: 527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 64.
    Schmalle H, Hausen BM (1980) Acamelin, a new sensitizing furano-quinone from acacia melanoxylon R. BR. Tetrahedron Lett 21: 149–152Google Scholar
  63. 65.
    Schubert H, Zschunke E, Prater E, Rothe A (1980) Some epidemiological datas about contact allergy in several socialist countries. 5th International Symposium of Contact Dermatitis, Barcelona, 28–30. 5. 1980, p 13Google Scholar
  64. 66.
    Schulz KH, Garbe I, Hausen BM, Simatupang MH (1979) The sensitizing capacity of naturally occurring quinones. II. Benzoquinones. Arch Dermatol Res 264: 275–284Google Scholar
  65. 67.
    Schultz Larsen F, Brandrup F (1980) Nickel release from metallic buttons in blue jeans. Contact Dermatitis 6: 298–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 68.
    Sengel D, Khelladi A, Foussereau J (1979) Berufsbedingte Allergie gegen Diazopapier in der Textilindustrie. Derm Beruf Umwelt 27: 178–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 69.
    Seville RH (1957) Dogger bank itch. Br J Dermatol 69: 92–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 70.
    Thorgeirsson A, Fregert S (1977) Allergenicity of epoxy resins in the guinea pig. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh) 57: 253–256Google Scholar
  69. 71.
    Turk JL, Parker D, Rudner EJ (1966) Preliminary results on the purification of the chemical sensitizing agent in alcyonidium gelatinosum. Proc R Soc Med 59: 1122–1124PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Björn M. Hausen
    • 1
  1. 1.Labor für experimentelle AllergologieHautklinik des Universitäts-KrankenhausesHamburg 20Deutschland

Personalised recommendations