Skip to main content

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Chlorambucil and Melphalan in Man

  • Chapter
Cancer Chemo- and Immunopharmacology

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 74))

Summary

We have studied the pharmacokinetics of orally administered chlorambucil and melphalan in patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. With a standard oral dose of 0.6 mg/kg, chlorambucil showed much more rapid systemic appearance than did melphalan and had a mean peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma disappearance curve which was 3–4 times greater than that observed in patients receiving melphalan. Melphalan had extremely variable systemic availability which was not observed with chlorambucil, and was not related to problems in tablet formulation. Chlorambucil undergoes extensive active metabolism to phenylacetic acid mustard, whereas melphalan undergoes rapid chemical degradation and has little, if any, active metabolism. On a pharmacokinetic basis, chlorambucil’s greater in vitro stability, its more rapid and predictable systemic availability after oral dosing, and its extremely low urinary excretion make it a more predictible alkylating agent for clinical use than melphalan, especially for patients with reduced renal function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberts DS, Chang SY, Chen H-SG, Evans TL, Moon TE (1980) Oral melphalan kinetics. Clin Pharmacol and Ther 26:737–745

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alberts DS, Chang SY, Chen H-SG, Gross JF, Walson PD, Moon TE, Salmon SE (1978) Variability of melphalan absorption in man. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res and Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:C–112

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alberts DS, Chang SY, Chen H-SG, Moon TE, Evans TL, Furner RL, Himmelstein K, Gross JF (1979) Pharmacokinetics of melphalan in man: Intravenous administration. Clin Pharmacol and Ther 26:73–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang SY, Alberts DS, Melnick LR, Walson PD, Salmon SE (1978) High-pressure liquid chromatographic analysis of melphalan in plasma. J Pharm Sci 67:679–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang SY, Evans TL, Alberts DS (1979) The stability of melphalan in the presence of chloride ion. J Pharm Pharmacol 3:853–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang SY, Evans TL, Alberts DS, Sipes IG (1978) The stability of L-phenylalanine mustard in bile. Life Sci 23:1697–1702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang SY, Larcom BJ, Alberts DS, Larsen B, Walson PD, Sipes IG (1980) Mass spectrometry of chlorambucil, its degradation products and its metabolite in biological samples. J Pharm Sci 69:80–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher B, Carbone P, Economou SG, Frelick R, Glass A, Lerner H, Redmond C, Zelen M, Band P, Katrych DL, Wolmark N, Fisher E (1975) L-Phenylalanine mustard (l-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer. A report of early findings. N Engl J Med 292:117–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Livingston RB, Carter SK (1970) Single agents in cancer chemotherapy. Plenum, New York, pp 81–111

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metzler CM (1969) NONLIN: A computer program for parameter estimation in nonlinear situations. Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan, Technical Rep 7292/69/2792/005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moore GE, Bross IDJ, Ausman R, Nadler S, Jones R, Jr, Slack N, Rimm AA (1968) Effects of chlorambucil (NSC 3088) in 374 patients with advanced cancer. Cancer Chemother Rep 52:661–666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Newell DR, Hart LI, Harrap, KR (1979) The estimation of chlorambucil, phenyl acetic mustard and prednimustine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 164:114–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sedman AJ, Wagner JG (1976) CSTRIP. A Fortran IV computer program for obtaining initial polyexponential parameter estimates. J Pharm Sci 65:1006–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tattersall MHN, Jarman M, Newlands ES, Holyhead L, Milstead RAV, Weinberg A (1978) Pharmacokinetics of melphalan following oral or intravenous administration in patients with malignant diseases. Eur J Cancer 14:507–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alberts, D.S., Chang, S.Y., Chen, HS.G., Larcom, B.J., Evans, T.L. (1980). Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Chlorambucil and Melphalan in Man. In: Mathé, G., Muggia, F.M. (eds) Cancer Chemo- and Immunopharmacology. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 74. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81488-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81488-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-81490-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81488-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics