Prospective Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening in the Netherlands

An example of the use of simulation models
  • J. D. F. Habbema
  • G. J. van Oortmarssen
  • P. J. van der Maas
  • G. A. de Jong
Conference paper
Part of the Medizinische Informatik und Statistik book series (MEDINFO, volume 15)

Summary

The Mass screening program on cervical cancer in the Netherlands started in 1976. Decision making on prolongation or modification of the program will depend on a careful evaluation of the results.

Effects of mass screening cannot be measured in a direct way, and therefore use of simulation models has been advocated, in order to estimate effects of different screening policies. A computer simulation programme which calculates the effects of screening in a birth cohort of the population has been developed by Knox. We extended this program to obtain predictionsof the effects for the population as a whole, and applied it to the dutch screening circumstances. When the effects of Papsmears made outside screening programs by general practitioners and gynaecologists are taken into account, the long term effect of mass screening on cervical cancer mortality is estimated to be a 35% decrease at most. The reliability of the results of the simulation model will improve when more results from (Dutch) mass screening and (Dutch) cancer and cytology registries become available, and by carefully assessing the sensitivity of results to variation of the model assumptions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, A., Gertman, P.M. and Louis, T.A. (1978). Screening for the Early Detection of Cancer. Mathematical Biosciences 40, 1–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyes, D.A., Worth, A.J. and Fidler, H.K. (1970). The results of Treatment of 4389 Cases of Preclinical Cervical Squamous Carcinoma. J. Obstet. Brit. Cwlth. 77, 769–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collette, H.J.A. (1976). Epidemiologische Aspekten van het Cervixcarcinoom. Boeijinga, Apeldoorn (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  4. Fidler, H.K., Boyes, D.A. and Worth, A.J. (1968). Cervical Cancer Detection in British Columbia. J. Obst. Gynaec. Brit. Cwlth. 75, 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guzick, D.S. (1978). Efficacy at screening for cervical cancer: a review. Am. J. Public Health 68, 125–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Habbema, J.D.F. and Oortmarssen, G.J. van (1979). Decision making on mass screening for disease. I. The use of mathematical models. To be published in: Modelle in der Medizih — Theorie und Praxis — Kongresbände GMDSGoogle Scholar
  7. Hakama, M. and Räsänen-Virtanen, U. (1976). Effects of a Mass Screening Program on the Risk of Cervical Cancer. Am. J. Epidemiol. 103, 512–517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Harmse, N.S. and de Waard, F. (1973). Recente ontwikkelingen van de kankerfrequentie in drie registratiegebieden in Nederland. T.soc.Geneesk. 51, 670–679 (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  9. IIASA (1975). Proceedings of the joint IIASA/WHO workshop on screening for cervical cancer. Laxenburg, Aprial 1–2, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. Knox, E.G. (1973). A simulation system for screening procedures. In: G. McLachlan (ed.): The future and present indicatives. Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust-London.Google Scholar
  11. Knox, E.G. (1975a). Computer Simulation Studies. of Alternative Population Screening Policies. In: Systems Aspects of Health Planning. N.T.J. Bailey, M. Thompson (eds.). North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Knox, E.G. (1975b). Simulation Studies of Breast Cancer Screening Programmes. In: Probes for Health, G. McLachlan (ed.). Nuffield Provincial Hospital Trust, London.Google Scholar
  13. May, D. (1974). Error Rates in Cervical Cytological Screening Tests. Br.J.Cancer 29, 106–113.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shwartz, M. (1978). An Analysis of the Benefits of Serial Screening for Breast Cancer upon a Mathematical Model of the Disease. Cancer 41, 1550–1564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Walton, R.J. c.s. (1976). Cervical cancer screening programs. CMA Journal 114: 1003–1033.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. F. Habbema
  • G. J. van Oortmarssen
  • P. J. van der Maas
  • G. A. de Jong

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations