Retroperitoneal Region

  • G. Marchal
  • Y. Coenen
  • A. L. Baert

Abstract

On a transverse axial slice of the abdomen the posterior abdominal wall is composed of the lumbar spine and the lumbar muscles with their different fat planes. The psoas muscles, intimately related to the vertebral body, assume a more symmetric and round form as the slices proceed from the cranium caudad. The great vessels are situated immediately before the vertebral bodies. The aorta is visible as a circular structure, which, on the upper abdominal slices, cannot be distinguished from the medial crura of the diaphragms. On all other slices the aorta is seen distinctly, even the aorto-iliac bifurcation. Below the renal arteries, however, the caliber of the visualized abdominal aorta progressively diminishes.

Keywords

Iodine Adenoma Barium Dition Glucagon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. ALFIDI, R.J., HAAGA, J.R., HAVILLA, T.T., PEPE, R.G., COOK, S.A.: Computed tomography of the liver. Amer. J. Roentgenol.127, 69–74 (1976Google Scholar
  2. ALFIDI, R.J., HAAGA, J.R., MEANY, T.F., MACINTYRE, W.J., GONZALEZ, L., TAZAR, R., ZELCH, M.G., BOLLER, M., COOK, S.A., JELDEN, G.: Computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen; A preliminary report. Radiology117, 257–264 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. ALFIDI, R.J., LAVAL-JEANTET, M.: AG 60–69-A promising contrast agent for computed tomography of the liver and spleen. Radiology121, 491 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. ALFIDI, R.J., MACINTYRE, W.J., HAAGA, J.R.: The effects of biological motion on CT resolution. Amer. J. Roentgenol.127, 11–15 (1976)Google Scholar
  5. ALFIDI, R.J., MACINTYRE, W.J., MEANY, T.F., et al.z Experimental studies to determine application of CAT scanning to the human body. Amer. J. Roentgenol.124, 199–207 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. AMBROSE, J.A.: Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography) Part 2. Clinical application. Brit. J. Radiol. 46, 1023–1047 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. AXELBAUM, S.P., SCHELLINGER, D., GOMES, H.N., FERRIS, R.A., HAKHAL, H.G.: Computed Tomographic evaluation of aortic aneurysms. Amer. J. Roentgenol.127, 75–78 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. BAERT, A.L., MARCHAL, G., PONETTE, E.: Computerized axial tomography of abdominal aortic aneurysm, beige Radiol. 59, 287–292 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. BAERT, A.L., MARCHAL, G., STAELENS, B., COENEN, Y.: CT evaluation of renal space occupying lesions. Fortschr. Röntgenstr.126, 285–291 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BAERT, A.L., PONETTE, E., PRINGOT, J., MARCHAL, G., DARDENNE, A., COENEN, Y.: Axiale Computer-gesteuerte Tomometrie bei akuter und chronischer Pankreatitis. Radiologe 17, 181–188 (1977)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. BERGSTRÖM, M., SUNDMAN., R.: Picture processing in computed tomography. Amer.J. Roentgenol. 127, 17–21 (1976)Google Scholar
  12. BROOKS, R.A., DI CHIRO, R.A.: Theory of image reconstruction in computed tomography. Radiology 117, 561–572 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. CARTER, B.L., KAHN, P.C., WOLPERT, S.M., HAMMERSCHLAG, S.B., SCHWARTZ, A.M., SCOTT, R.M.: Unusual pelvic masses : A comparison of computed tomographic scanning and ultrasonography. Radiology121, 383–390 (1976)Google Scholar
  14. CHERNAK, E.S., RODRIGUEZ-ANTUNEZ, A., JELDEN, G.L., DHALIWAL, R.S., LAVIK, P.S.: The use of computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning. Radiology 117, 613–614 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. CHORMACH, A.M.: Representation of a function by its line integrals, with some radiological applications. J. Appl. Phys.35, 2908–2913 (1974)Google Scholar
  16. GROSSMANN, Z.S., WISTOW, B.W., WALLINGA, H.A., HEITZMANN, E.R.: Recognition of vertebral abnormalities in computed tomography of the chest and abdomen. Radiology 121, 369–373 (1976)Google Scholar
  17. HAAGA, R.J., ALFIDI, R.J.: Precise biopsy localisation by computed tomography. Radiology 118, 603–607 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. HAAGA, R.J., ALFIDI, R.J., ZELCH, M.G., MCANY, T.F., BOLLER, M., GONZALEZ, L., JELDEN, G.N.: Computed tomography of the pancreas. Radiology120, 589–595 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. HAMMERSCHLAG, S.B., WOLPERT, S.M., CARTER, B.L.: Computed tomography of the spinal canal. Radiology 121 ,361–367 (1976)Google Scholar
  20. HOUNSFIELD, G.N.: Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). Part 1 : Description of system. Brit. J. Radiol. 46, 1016–1022 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. HOUNSFIELD, G.N.: Picture quality of computed tomography. Amer. J. Roentgenol127, 2–9 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. JELDEN, G.L., CHERNAK, E.S., RODRIGUEZ-ANTUNEZ, A., et al.: Further progress in CT scanning and computerized radiation therapy treatment planning. Amer.J. Roentgenol.127, 179–185 (1976)Google Scholar
  23. JELDEN, G.L., SUFKA, B., ARNOLD, J., RODRIGUEZ-ANTUNEZ, A., DOERING, E., LAVIK, P.,TURNBULL, R.: New dimensions in computed tomography. Radiology123, 213–215 (1977)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. KREEL, L.: Preliminary evaluation of the E.M.I. whole body scanner. J. beige Radiol. 59,267 (1976)Google Scholar
  25. KREEL, L.: The E.M.I. whole body scanner in the demonstration of lymph node enlargement. Clin. Radiol. 27, 421–429 (1976)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. KREEL, L.: Computerized tomography using the E.M.I. general purpose scanner. Brit. J. Radiol. 50, 2–14 (1977)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. KORMANO, M., DEAN, P.B.: Extravascular contrast material : the major component of contrast enhancement. Radiology 121, 379–382 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. LEDLEY, R.S., DI CHIRO, G., LUESSENHOP, A.J., et al.: Computerized transaxial X-ray tomography of the human body. Science186, 207–212 (1974)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MCCULLOUGH, E.C., COULAM, C.M.: Physical and dosimetric aspects of diagnostic geometrical and computer-assisted tomographic procedures. Radiol. Clin. North. Am.XIV, 3–14 (1976)Google Scholar
  30. OSTEAUX, M., STRUYVEN, J., HUVENNE, J., JEANMART, L.: Tomographie axiale compu-térisée dans le diagnostic et la mise au point des processus tumoraux pelviens et abdominaux inférieurs. J. beige Radiol. 59, 293–300 (1976)Google Scholar
  31. PALMERS, Y., BAERT, A.L., MARCHAL, G., COENEN, Y.: Computed tomography (CT) in affections of the vertebral column and of the spinal cord. J. beige Radiol.59, 521–530 (1976)Google Scholar
  32. PHILIPS, R.L., STEPHENS, D.H.: Computed tomography of liver specimens. Radiology 115, 43–46 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. PICKERING, R.S., HATTERY, R.R., HARTMANN, G.W., HOLLEY, K.E.: Computed tomography of the excised kidney. Radiology113, 643–647 (1974)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. SAGEL, S., STANLEY, R.J., EVENS, R.G.: Early clinical experience with motionless whole body computed tomography. Radiology119, 321–330 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. SCHELLINGER, D., DI CHIRO, G., AXELBAUM, S.P., TWIGG, H.L., LEDLEY, R.S.: Early clinical experience with the ACTA scanner. Radiology114, 257–261 (1975)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. SHEEDY, P.F., STEPHENS, D.H., HATTERY, R.R, MUHM, J.R., HARTMAN, G.W.: Computed tomography of the bodyinitial clinical trial with the E.M.I. prototype. Amer. J. Roentgenol. 127, 23–51 (1976)Google Scholar
  37. STANLEY, R.J., SAGEL, S.S., LEVIT, R.G.: Computed tomography of the body: early trends in application and accuracy of the method. Amer. J. Roentgenol.127, 53–67 (1976)Google Scholar
  38. STEPHENS, D.H., SHEEDY, P.F., HATTERY, R.R., HARTMANN, G.W.: Initial clinical experience with computerized tomography of the body. Rad. Clin. of North Am.XIV, 149–158 (1976)Google Scholar
  39. STEPHENS, D.H., HATTERY, R.R., SHEEDY, P.F.: Computed tomography of the abdomen: early experience with the E.M.I. body scanner. Radiology119, 331–335 (1976)Google Scholar
  40. TWIGG, H.L., AXELBAUM, S.P., SCHELLINGER, D.: Computerized body tomography with ACTA Scanner. J.A.M.A.234, 314–317 (1975)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Marchal
  • Y. Coenen
  • A. L. Baert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations