Advertisement

Effects of the Removal of the Regional Lymph Nodes on the Survival of Mice Bearing B16 Melanoma or EAkR Lymphosarcoma

  • F. Economides
  • M. Bruley-Rosset
Part of the Recent Results in Cancer Research / Fortschritte der Krebsforschung / Progrès dans les recherches sur le cancer book series (RECENTCANCER, volume 62)

Summary

This work presents data concerning the effect of tumor excision accompanied or not by the removal of the regional lymph node (RLN) on the survival time of mice bearing the EAkR lymphosarcoma or the B16 melanoma. The operations were performed at various times to study this effect in relation to tumor size.

Early tumorectomy, on day 6 for the EAkR lymphosarcoma, on day 10 for the B16 melanoma, significantly prolonged the survival time. The additional removal of the RLN abolished this beneficial effect. In the case of the EAkR lymphosarcoma, a beneficial effect on the survival time was, in contrast, observed after total excision of the tumor accompanied by RLN removal performed on day 8. The two surgical procedures were ineffective in increasing the survival time when they were applied after the 8th day for the EAkR lymphosarcoma and after the 10th day for the B16 melanoma.

These results suggest that the preservation of the RLN may be favorable for the host, at least at an early stage of the tumor growth.

Keywords

Additional Removal Main Tumor Mass Iymph Node Iffa Credo ceIl Suspension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Crile, G.: The effect on metastasis of removing or irradiating regional lymph nodes of mice. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 126, 1272 (1968).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crile, G.: Possible role of uninvolved regional nodes in preventing metastasis from breast cancer. Cancer 24, 1283 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fidler, I. J., McWilliams, R. W., Nielsen, S. B., Budmen, M. B.: Role of the regional lymph node in neoplasia: cellular mediated reactivity in vitro by autologous regional and distant lymph nodes or peripheral blood lymphocytes of dogs with spontaneous neoplasms. Immunol. Comm. 4, 325 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher, B., Fisher, E. R.: Barrier function of lymph node to tumor cells and erythrocytes. I and II. Cancer 20, 1914 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldfarb, P. M., Hardy, M. A.: The immunologic responsiveness of regional lymphocytes in experimental cancer. Cancer 35, 778 (1975).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitchison, N. A.: Passive transfer of transplantation immunity. Proc. Roy. Soc. (B) 142, 72 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Economides
  • M. Bruley-Rosset

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations