Advertisement

The computer utility in a health enviroment

  • W. Schneider
Part of the Medizinische Informatik und Statistik book series (MEDINFO, volume 3)

Abstract

A health information system (HIS)must be arranged so as to be useful for widely different circumstances of care. These include information processing where requirements have different timing requirements, levels of detail, need for readiness of access, etc.
  1. a.

    For anticipatory screening to prevent illness and disability and to achieve improved personal health as well as to recognize and control early disease resk factors.

     
  2. b.

    For periodic and episodic acute or short term care designed to remedy or cure illnesses and injuries. This may involve management of life threatening situations. Data access is almost unpredictable in respect to whom and when.

     
  3. c.

    For comprehensive, continuing, or extended care (often called “long term”), where the purpose is to restore healthful status or to achieve rehabilitation or restoration of function. Predictability of usage is high and repetitive. Extended life maintaining services may have to be aided when the original medical condition is incurable or unavoidable as can occur with advanced age, etc. In this circumstance it is crucial that the system assist in achieving comprehensiveness and continuity.

     
  4. d.

    For population health educational purpose largely directed toward better personal health practices preserving the capacity to cope with illness and disability. Here, generality of data usage and elective usage of data is common.

     

Keywords

Hospital Information System Health Information System Modular Approach Hospital Administrator Medical Information System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G.O. Barnett, The Modular Hospital Information System. Comp. and Biomed. Res., Fourth Vol., B. Waxman and R.W. Stacy, eds., Academic Press (in press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.F. Collen, Implementing hospital computer systems: general requirements, in: Hospital Computer Systems, M.F. Collen, ed. ( John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P.F.L. Hall, Implementing hospital computer systems: current status of the Karolinska hospital computer system (Stockholm), in: Hospital Computer Systems, M.F. Collen, ed. (John Wiley and Sons, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.L. Reichertz, Implementing hospital computer systems: Medical School of Hannover Hospital Computer System (Hannover), in: Hospital Computer Systems, M.F. Collen, ed. ( John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1974 ).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Schneider, Integrattion of data from a computer automated laboratory into a generalized hospital information system, in: Automatisierung des klinischen Laboratoriums (F.K. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart-New York, 1968 ) pp. 301–305;Google Scholar
  6. W. Schneider, MSS, a centrally planned decentralized medical information system in Sweden, Proc. of MÉDIS 1972, Osaka International Symposium on Medical Information Systems, Kansai Institute of Information Systems, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    B.G. Lamson, personal communication. Director, Center for Health Sciences, School of Medicine, UCLA, Calif.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    A.W. Pratt, NIH computer hardware complex. Federation Proceedings of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Computer Conference, Vol. 33, No. 12 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    R. Fajman and J. Borgelt, Communications of ACM, V. 16, N5 (1973).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    R. Sproull, Omnigraph Decsystem-10 Display Systems. Technical Report, DCRT, NIH, DHEW, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    G. Knott, MLAB“ An On-line Modeling Laboratory. Technical Report, DCRT, NIH, DHEW, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    R. Shrager, MODELAIDE: A computer graphics program for the evaluation of mathematical models. Technical Report DCRT, NIH, DHEW, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    W. Spencer, R. Baker and C. Moffet, Hospital computer system, Adv. Biomed. Engin. 2 (1972) 61.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    B.G. Lamson, W.S. Russel, J. Fulimore and W.E. Nix, The first decade of effort: Progress towards a hospital information system at the UCLA hospital, Los Angeles, California, Meth. Inform. Med. 9 (1970) pp. 73–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    U. Ericsson, W. Schneider and K. Vogel, The problem of privacy in a computer based integrated health care information system, Proc. of MEDINFO 74, Vol. 2 ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975 ) p 694.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    K. Sauter, (Ed.): A Data Structure Model for a Health Information System, Computer Programs in Biomedicine 6 (1976) issue 3.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    M. Jainz, and T. Risch, ed.: A Data-Manager for a Health Information System. Computer Programs in Biomedicine 6 (1976) issue 3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Schneider

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations