Skip to main content

On the Time Required for Conception

  • Chapter
Mathematical Demography

Part of the book series: Biomathematics ((BIOMATHEMATICS,volume 6))

  • 827 Accesses

Abstract

We omit the appendix, and sections of the paper discussing correlations between two successive conception delays and numerical results. (The maximum likelihood estimates for the mean and variance of fecundability, developed in the appendix, are the \(\overline p \) and V p given in our introduction to Henry, paper 41 above.)

From Population Studies 18. Excerpts are from pages 85–92.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Henry, Intervals between confinements in the absence of birth control, Eugenics Quarterly, 5, 1958, pp. 200–11

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.G. Potter, Jr., Birth intervals: Structure and change, Population Studies, 17, 2, 1963, pp. 155–166

    Google Scholar 

  3. M.C. Sheps and E. B. Perrin, in Changes in birth rates as a function of contraceptive effectiveness: some applications of a stochastic modef, American Journal of Public Health, 53, 1963, pp. 1031–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M.C. Shefs and E. B. Perrin: The distribution of birth intervals under a class of stochastic fertility models, Population Studies, 17, 3, 1964, 321–31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Tietze, ‘Differential fecundity and effectiveness of contraception’. The Eugenics Review, 50, 1959, pp. 231–4

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.G. Potter Jr., loc cit., and ‘Length of the observation period as a factor affecting the contraceptive failure rate’, Milhank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 38, 1960, 142–4

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Gini. ‘Premières recherches sur la fécondabilité de la femme’, Proc. of the International Mathematics Congress, 1924, 889–92

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Henry, Fondements théoriques des mesures de la fécondité naturelle, Rev. de Flnst. Int. de Statistique, 21, 3, 1953, 135–51

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Cramér, Mathematical Methods of Statistics, Princeton, 1946, p. 175.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. R.G. Potter, ‘Additional measures of use—effectiveness in contraception’, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 41, 1963, pp. 400–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M.G. Kendall and A. Stuart, The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1, London, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. B. Perrin and M. C. Sheps, ‘Human Reproduction’. A Stochastic Process. Biometrics, 20, 1, 1964, 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Z.M. Sykes (1969), who considers the treatment of variances and covariances in different projection models, and Tore Schweder (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheps, M.C. (1977). On the Time Required for Conception. In: Mathematical Demography. Biomathematics, vol 6. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81046-6_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81046-6_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-81048-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81046-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics