On the Integral Equation Method

  • H. Nørstrud
Conference paper
Part of the International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics book series (IUTAM)

Summary

The integral equation method has been discussed in three papers at this symposium and it might seem a little disappointing to note, especially for the case with shocks, that the method has not yet reached a satisfactory stage of completeness. However, the solution method itself has revealed various important features which gives a strong cause for further development. The purpose of the present comments is to voice a word of optimism in this respect.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nixon, D.; Hancock, G.J.: Integral Equation Methods — A Reappraisal. Proc. Symp. Trans. II, Göttingen (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norstrud, H.: The Transonic Aerofoil Problem with Embedded Shocks. The Aero. Quart. 24, 2 (1973) 129–138.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nixon, D.: A Comparison of Two Integral Equation Methods for High Subsonic Lifting Flows. The Aero. Quart. 26, 1 (1975) 56–58.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nocilla, S.; Geymonat, G.; Gabutti, B.: The direct problem of the transonic airfoils on the hodograph. Proc. Symp. Trans. II, Göttingen (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nørstrud, H.: Numerische Lösungen von schallnahen Strömungen um ebene Profile. Dissertation TH Wien (1968).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jameson, A.: Numerical Solution of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations of Mixed Type. Paper presented at Third Symp. on Num. Sol. of Part. Dif. Eqs. (1975).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magnus, R.; Gallaher, W.; Yoshihara, H.: Inviscid supercritical airfoil theory. AGARD Conf. Proc. 35 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Nørstrud
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Aero- and Gas DynamicsThe Norwegian Institute of TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations