Rhythmic Expectancy in Continuous Speech Perception

  • J. G. Martin
Conference paper
Part of the Communication and Cybernetics book series (COMMUNICATION, volume 11)

Abstract

The model concerns moment-to-moment listener expectancies based upon the dynamics of patterned speech movement. For convenience here we distinguish between (a) temporally short-lived (segmental) cues including coarticulatory effects and (b) all other cues (call them suprasegmentale) in continuous speech perception. Suprasegmental cues enable the listener to expect or anticipate the rough outlines of speech not yet heard. These suprasegmental redundancies include timing and hence generate listener expectancies in real time. At some given moment after prior context has been heard. suprasegmental processing load is lighter, with correspondingly greater efficiency in segmental processing. That is, segmental and suprasegmental processing can be said to interact.

Keywords

Prefix Acoustics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abercrombie, D. Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, G. D. Rhythm. Section contributed to Netsell, R. Speech physiology. In F. Flinifie, T. Hixon, and F. Williams (Eds.), Normal aspects of speech, hearing and language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, G. D. Speech rhythm: Its relation to performance universals and articula-tory timing. Journal of Phonetics. 1975 (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Blesser, B. A. Perception of spectrally rotated speech. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. Bolinger, D. L. Pitch accent and sentence rhythm. In I. Abe and T. Kanekiyo (Eds.), Forms of English. Cambridge: Harvard Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, F. S., Delattre, P., Liberman, A. M., Borst, J. M., and Gerstman, L. J. Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24. 597–606, 1952.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Dallett, K. M. Effects of a supplementary prefix on recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67. 296–298, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dorman, M. F., Raphael, L. J., Liberman, A. M. and Repp, B. Some maskino-like phenomena in speech perception. Paper presented at Acoustical Society of America, Austin, Texas, April, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Foss, D. J. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 457–462, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garner, W. R. The stimulus in information processing. American Psychologist, 25, 350–358, 1970.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, J. J. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, G. M. On the front cavity resonance, and its possible role in speech perception, Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 1975 (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, J. G. Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review, 79, 487–509, 1972.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Meltzer, R. H., Martin, J. G., Mills, C. B., Imhoff, D., and Zohar, D. Reaction time to temporally-displaced phoneme targets in continuous speech, (submitted for editorial review) 1975.Google Scholar
  16. Mills, C. B., and Martin, J. G. Articulatory organization in the stimulus prefix effect. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 309–314, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mills, C. B., and Martin, J. G. Effects of articulatory organization of speech on digit recall. Paper presented at American Psychological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, August 1975.Google Scholar
  18. Neisser, U., Hoenig, Yvette, J., and Goldstein, Evelyn. Perceptual organization in the prefix affect. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 424–429, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shields, J. L., McHugh, A., and Martin, J. G., Reaction time to phoneme targets as a function of rhythmic cues in continuous speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 250–255, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sturges, P. T., and Martin, J. G. Rhythmic structure in auditory pattern perception and immediate memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 377–383, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Svensson, S. -G. Prosody and grammar in speech perception. Doctoral Dissertation, MILUS 2 (Monographs from the Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm), 1974.Google Scholar
  22. Woodrow, H. A. Quantitative study of rhythm. Archives of Psychology, 18, No. 1, 1909.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. G. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations