Abstract
The perception of segments of speech one or two phonemes long is now quite well understood. This is because listeners rather readily accept the sort of experimental situation where they are asked simply to identify brief utterances, not always meaningful words in their language. A variety of powerful paradigms using variants of simple identification (for example reaction times and dichotic presentation) have been developed to specify factors involved in identifying these short segments of speech. Those not trained in the intellectual tradition of analytical experimental science are easily dissatisfied with the formal as opposed to superficial relevance that these tasks have to the perception of speech in real life situations, and those of us who have been studying perception at the phonemic level for many years have a kind of obligation not to rebuff their demands that we should be concerned with chunks of material of size that could actually constitute an utterance in a communication situation. Hence the title of this symposium “Dynamic Aspects of Speech Perception” is deliberately vague to avoid the implication that we are exclusively concerned with prosody, syntax, pragmatics or whatever. We are concerned with continuous speech perception.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cole, R.A. and Scott, B. Toward a theory of speech perception. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 348–374.
Cutler, A. Personal communication, 1975. Dooling, D.J. Rhythm and syntax in sentence perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 1974, 13, 255–264.
Lackner, J.R. and Garrett, M.F. Resolving ambiguity: effects of biasing context in the unattended ear. Cognition, 1972, 1 359–372.
Neisser, U. Cognitive Psychology. New York: Appleton-Century, 1967.
Newell, A. You can’t play 20 questions with Nature and win. In W.G. Chase (ed) Visual Information Processing, 1973, 283–308. Academic Press: New York.
Newell, A. et al. Speech Understanding Systems. Final Report of a Study Group, 1973. North Holland: Amsterdam.
Winograd, T. Understanding natural language. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Wood, C.J. Parallel processing of auditory and phonetic information in speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 15 501–508.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1975 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Haggard, M. (1975). Understanding Speech Understanding. In: Cohen, A., Nooteboom, S.G. (eds) Structure and Process in Speech Perception. Communication and Cybernetics, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81000-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81000-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-81002-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-81000-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive