Waveguide Mode Effects, Birefringence and Dichroism in Fly Photoreceptors

  • Kuno Kirschfeld
  • Allan W. Snyder

Abstract

There are eight photoreceptors in each ommatidium of the compound eye of the fly, Musca Six of them (numbered 1 to 6) are similar with respect to the size of their rhabdomeres. They are different from the two others, the receptors no. 7 and 8, which are thinner and shorter. The difference between the two types of receptors is not limited to their size. Each type is the input to one of two different subsystems of the visual system of the fly (KIRSCHFELD and FRANCESCHINI, 1968; review KIRSCHFELD, 1973).

Keywords

Microwave Anisotropy Albumin Retina Eter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BARER, R., JOSEPH, S.: Refractometry of living cells. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 95, 399–423 (1954).Google Scholar
  2. BOSCHEK, C.B.: On the fine structure of the peripheral retina and lamina ganglionaris of the fly, Mucca domestica. Z. Zellforsch. 118, 369–409 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CASE, J.F.: Differentatiation of the effects of pH and CO2 on spiracular function of insects. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 49, 103–113 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DÖRRSCHEIDT-KÄFER, M.: Die Empfindlichkeit einzelner Photorezeptoren im Komplexauge von Calliphora erythrocephaZa. J. comp. Physiol. 81, 309–340 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ECKERT, H.: Spectral sensitivities of receptor systems in eye of the fly Musca. Die Naturwissenschaften 59, 80–81 (1972).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. ENOCH, J.M.: Optical properties of the retinal receptors. J. opt. Soc. Am. 53 71–85 (1963).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. HAMDORF, K., ROSNER, G.: Adaptation und Photoregeneration im Fliegenauge. J. comp. Physiol. 86, 281–292 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ISRAELACHVILLI, J.N., SAMMUT, R.A., SNYDER, A.W.: Birefringence and dichroism of photoreceptors. (1975) in preparation.Google Scholar
  9. KIRSCHFELD, K.: Die Projektion der optischen Umwelt auf das Raster der Rhabdomere im Komplexauge von Musca. Exp. Brain Res. 3, 248–270 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. KIRSCHFELD, K.: Absorption properties of photopigments in single rods, cones and rhabdomeres. In: Processing of Optical Data by Organisms and Machines (ed. W. REICHARDT ) pp. 116–136. New York-London: Academic Press 1969.Google Scholar
  11. KIRSCHFELD, K.: Das neurale Superpositionsauge. Fortschritt d. Zoologie (ed. M. LINDAUER) Vol. XXI, pp. 229–257. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer 1973.Google Scholar
  12. KIRSCHFELD, K., FRANCESCHINI, N.: Optische Eigenschaften der Ommatidien im Komplexauge von Musca. Kybernetik 5, 47–52 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. KIRSCHFELD, K., FRANCESCHINI, N.: Ein Mechanismus zur Steuerung des Lichtflusses in den Rhabdomeren des Komplexauges von Musca. Kybernetik 6, 13–22 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. KIRSCHFELD, K., LUTZ, B.: Lateral inhibition in the compound eye of the fly, Musca. Z. Naturforsch. 29c, 95–97 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. KIRSCHFELD, K., REICHARDT, W.: Optomotorische Versuche an Musca mit linear polarisiertem Licht. Z. Naturforsch. 25b 228 (1970).Google Scholar
  16. LIEBMAN, P.A., JAGGER, W.S., KAPLAN, M.W., BARGOOT, F.G.: Membrane structure changes in rod outer segments associated with rhodopsin bleaching. Nature 251, 31–36 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. McCANN, G.D., ARNETT, D.W.: Spectral and polarization sensitivity of the Dipteran visual system. J. Gen. Physiol. 59, 534–558 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. PASK, C., SNYDER, A.W.: Angular sensitivity of lens-photoreceptor systems. This volume, pp. 159–166.Google Scholar
  19. SAMMUT, R., SNYDER, A.W.: Contribution of unbound modes to light absorption in visual photoreceptors. (1975) in preparation.Google Scholar
  20. SCHOLES, J.: The electrical responses of the retinal receptors and the lamina in the visual system of the fly Musca. Kybernetik 6, 149–162 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. SCHÜMPERLI, R.A.: Evidence for colour vision in Drosophila melanogaster through spontaneous phototactic choice behaviour. J. comp. Physiol. 116, 77–94 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SEITZ, G.: Der Strahlengang im Appositionsauge von Calliphora erythrocephaZa (Meig.). Z. vergl. Physiol. 59, 205–231 (1968).Google Scholar
  23. SEITZ, G.: Polarisationsoptische Untersuchungen am Auge von Calliphora erythrocephala (Meig.). Z. Zellforsch. 93, 525–529 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SNYDER, A.W.: Asymptotic expressions for eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of a dielectric or optical waveguide. IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques 17, 1130–1138 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. SNYDER, A.W.: Leaky-ray theory of optical waveguides of circular cross section. J. appl. Phys. 4, 273–298 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. SNYDER, A.W.: Photoreceptor optics–theoretical principles. This volume, pp. 38–55.Google Scholar
  27. SNYDER, A.W., MILLER, W.H.: Fly colour vision. Vision Res. 12, 1389–1396 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. SNYDER, A.W., PASK, C.: Spectral sensitivity of dipteran retinula cells. J. comp. Physiol. 84, 59–76 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. STAVENGA, D.G.: Visual receptor optics, rhodopsin and pupil in fly retinula cells. Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit, Groningen 1974.Google Scholar
  30. STAVENGA, D.G., ZANTEMA, A., KUIPER, J.W.: Rhodopsin processes and the function of the pupil mechanism in flies. In: Biochemistry and Physiology of Visual Pigments (ed. H. LANGER ) pp. 175–179. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1973.Google Scholar
  31. STOCKHAMMER, K.: Zur Wahrnehmung der Schwingungsrichtung linear polarisierten Lichtes bei Insekten. Z. vergl. Physiol.38 30–83 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WIJNGAARD, W.: Depolarisation of plane-polarised light by light guiding frog rods. J. opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1187–1189 (1971).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kuno Kirschfeld
  • Allan W. Snyder

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations