Dark Regeneration of Invertebrate Visual Pigments

  • Doekele G. Stavenga


The question of whether or not the visual pigments of invertebrates are regenerated in the dark has been the subject of a vivid debate at the Darmstadt congress. This account has been prepared as a survey of the present-day state of the problem.


Dark Regeneration Visual Pigment Dark Process Small Tortoiseshell Vivid Debate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. BONTING, S.L.: General discussion concluding the Bochum symposium, 1972. In: Biochemistry and Physiology of Visual Pigments (ed. H. LANGER).Berlin-HeidelbergNew York: Springer 1973.Google Scholar
  2. BROWN, P.K., WHITE, R.H.: Rhodopsin of the larval mosquito. J. gen. Physiol. 59, 401–414 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DAEMEN, F.J.M., ROTMANS, J.P., BONTING, S.L.: On the rhodopsin cycle. Exp. Eye Res. 18, 97–103 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. FEIN, A., CONE, R.A.: Limulus rhodopsin: Rapid return of transient intermediates to the thermally stable state. Science 182, 495–497 (1973).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. FEIN, A., DeVOE, R.D.: Adaptation in the ventral eye of Limulus is functionally independent of the photochemical cycle, membrane potential and membrane resistance. J. gen. Physiol. 61, 273–289 (1973).Google Scholar
  6. FRANCESCHINI, N.: Sampling of the Visual Environment by the Compound Eye of the Fly: Fundamentals and Applications. This volume, pp. 98–125.Google Scholar
  7. FRANCESCHINI, N., KIRSCHFELD, K,: Les phénoménes de pseudopupille dans l’oeil composé de Drosophila. Kybernetik 9, 159–182 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. GOLDSMITH, T.H.: The natural history of invertebrate visual pigments. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology (ed. H.J.A. DARTNALL), Vol. VII/1, pp. 685–719. BerlinHeidelberg-New York: Springer 1972.Google Scholar
  9. GOLDSMITH, T.H., BERNARD, G.D.: The visual system of insects. In: The Physiology of Insecta (ed. M. ROCKSTEIN),Vol. II, pp. 165–272. San Francisco: Academic Press 1974.Google Scholar
  10. GOLDSMITH, T.H., BRUNO, M.S.: Behavior of rhodopsin and metarhodopsin in isolated rhabdoms of crabs and lobster. In: Biochemistry and Physiology of Visual Pigments.(ed. H. LANGER), pp. 147–153.Google Scholar
  11. HAMDORF, K.: Korrelationen zwischen Sehfarbstoffgehalt und Empfindlichkeit beiPhotorezeptoren. Verh. Dtsch. Zool, Ges., Köln 1970. 64, 148–158 (1970).Google Scholar
  12. HAMDORF, K., GOGALA, M.: Photoregeneration und Bereichseinstellung der Empfindlich-keit beim UV-Rezeptor. J. comp. Physiol. 86, 231–245 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. HAMDORF, K., GOGALA, M., SCHWEMER, J.: Beschleunigung der “Dunkeladaptation” eines UV-Rezeptors durch sichtbare Strahlung. Z. vergl. Physiol. 75, 189–199 (1971).Google Scholar
  14. HAMDORF, K„ HÖGLUND, G., LANGER, H.: Photoregeneration of visual pigments in amoth. J. comp. Physiol. 86, 247–263 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. HILLMAN, P., DODGE, F.A., HOCHSTEIN, S., KNIGHT, B.W., MINKS, B.: Rapid dark recovery of the invertebrate early receptor potential. J. gen. Physiol. 62, 77–86 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HOGLUND, G., HAMDORF, K., ROSNER, G.: Trichromatic visual system in an insect and its sensitivity control by blue light. J. comp. Physiol. 86, 265–279 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. HUBBARD, R., ST. GEORGE, R.C.C.: The rhodopsin system of the squid. J. gen. Physiol. 41, 501–528 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. LANGER, H.: Properties and Functions of Screening Pigments in Insect Compound Eyes, this volume, pp. 429–455.Google Scholar
  19. MILLER, W.H., BERNARD, G.D,: Butterfly glow. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 24, 286–294 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MINKS, B., HOCHSTEIN, S., HILLMAN, P,: Derivation of a quantitative kinetic model for a visual pigment from observations of early receptor potential. Biophys. J. 14, 490–512 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MORTON, R.A.: The chemistry of the visual pigments. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology (ed. H.J.A. DARTNALL), Vol. VII/1, pp. 33–68. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1972.Google Scholar
  22. PAK, W.L., LIDINGTON, K.J.: Fast electrical potential from a long-lived, long-wave-length photoproduct of fly visual pigment. J. gen. Physiol. 63, 740–756 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SCHWEMER, J.: Der Sehfarbstoff von Eledone moschata and seine Umsetzungen in der lebenden Netzhaut. Z. vergl. Physiol. 62, 121–152 (1969)Google Scholar
  24. STAVENGA, D.G.: Visual adaptation in butterflies. Submitted to Nature (1975).Google Scholar
  25. STAVENGA, D.G.: Optical Qualities of the Fly Eye, An Approach from the Side of Geometrical, Physical and Waveguide Optics. This volume, pp. 126–144.Google Scholar
  26. STAVENGA, D.G., FLOKSTRA, J,H., KUIPER, J.W.: Action of visual pigment conversions on the pupil mechanism of flies. Submitted in a revised version to Nature (1975).Google Scholar
  27. STAVENGA, D.G., ZANTEMA, A., KUIPER, J.W.: Rhodopsin processes and the function of the pupil mechanism in flies. In: Biochemistry and Physiology of Visual Pigments (ed. H. LANGER ), pp. 175–180. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doekele G. Stavenga

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations