Advertisement

Historical Survey of Primary Productivity Research

  • Helmut Lieth
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 14)

Abstract

From a recent paper on the history of the discovery of photosynthesis (Rabinovitch, 1971), it appears that many biologists equate photosynthesis with productivity and identify the raw materials of photosynthesis (water, carbon dioxide, and sunlight energy) as the direct controls of productivity. Photosynthesis and primary productivity are not so simply identical. Indeed, primary productivity—the actual energy bound into organic matter—is the product of photosynthesis. Yet primary productivity requires more than photosynthesis alone. The uptake and incorporation of inorganic nutrients into the diverse organic compounds of protoplasm are essential to the photosynthesizing organism. Temperatures govern annual productivity in various ways that do not result from temperature dependence of the photosynthetic process. On land, productivity is strongly affected by the availability of water, not primarily for use in the photosynthetic process itself, but to replace the water lost through the stomata that are open to allow carbon dioxide uptake.

Keywords

Primary productivity history ecology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazilevich, N.I., A.V. Drozdov, and L. E. Rodin. 1968. Productivity of the plant cover of the earth, general regularities of its distribution and relation to climatic factors. [In Russian with Engl, summ.] Zh. Obshch. Biol. 29:267–271.Google Scholar
  2. ———, L. E. Rodin, and N. N. Rozov. 1970. Untersuchungen der biologischen Produktivität in geographischer Sicht. (In Russian.) 5th Tagung Geogr. Ges. USSR Leningrad.Google Scholar
  3. Boussingault, J. B. 1851. Die Landwirtschaft in ihren Beziehungen zur Chemie, Physik und Meteorologie. (German transl. by N. Graeger), Vol. 1, 399 pp. Halle: Graeger Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Cusanus, N. (Nicolai de Cusa). 1450. De statics experimentatis.Google Scholar
  5. ———(Nicolaus von Cues). 1967. Schriften des-Heft.5. Den Laie über Versuche mit der Waage. (Transl. by Hildegund Menzel-Rogner), Leipzig: Meiner Verlag, 85 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Ebermayer, E. 1876. Die gesamte Lehre der Waldstreu mit Rücksicht auf die chemische Statik des Waldbaues., 300+116 pp. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1882. Naturgesetzliche Grundlagen des Wald- und Ackerbaues, Vol. 1: Die Bestandteile der Pflanzen., Part I Physiologische Chemie der Pflanzen. 861 pp. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Fleming, R. H. 1957. General features of the oceans. In Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology, J. W. Hedgepeth, ed. Vol. 2:Ecology, pp. 87–108. Geological Society of American Mem. 67 (1), New York.Google Scholar
  9. Fogg, G. E. 1958. Actual and potential yields in photosynthesis. Advan. Sci. 14:359–400.Google Scholar
  10. Gessner, F. 1959. Hydrobotanik Vol. 2, 701 pp. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  11. Golley, F. B. 1972. Energy flux in ecosystems, In Ecosystem Structure and Function, J. A. Wiens, ed. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State Univ. Ann. Biol. Colloq. 31: 69–90.Google Scholar
  12. Junge, C. E., and Czeplak, G. 1968. Some aspects of the seasonal variation of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tellus 20: 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liebig, J. von. 1840. Organic Chemistry and Its Applications to Agriculture and Physiology (Engl, ed.: L. Playfair and W. Gregory.) 387 pp. London: Taylor and Walton.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1862. Die Naturgesetze des Feldbaues, 467 pp. Braunschweig: Vieweg.Google Scholar
  15. Lieth, H. 1962. Die Stoffproduktion der Pflanzendecke, 156 pp. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1964. Versuch einer kartographischen Darstellung der Produktivität der Pflanzendecke auf der Erde. Geographisches Taschenbuch, 1964/65, pp. 72–80. Wiesbaden: Max Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1972. Über die Primärproduktion der Pflanzendecke der Erde. Z. Angew. Bot. 46:1–37.Google Scholar
  18. Mitscherlich, E. A. 1954. Bodenkunde für Landwirte, Forstwirte und Gärtner, 7th ed., 168 pp. Berlin and Hamburg: Parey.Google Scholar
  19. Müller, D. 1960. Kreislauf des Kohlenstoffs. Handbuch Pflanzenphysiol 12:934–948.Google Scholar
  20. Noddack, W. 1937. Der Kohlenstoff im Haushalt der Natur. Angew. Chem. 50:505–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———, and J. Komor. 1937. Über die Ausnutzung des Sonnenlichtes beim Wachstum der grünen Pflanzen unter natürlichen Bedingungen. Angew. Chem. 50:271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rabinowitch, E. 1971. An unfolding discovery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US 68:2875–2876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Riley, G. A. 1944. The carbon metabolism and photosynthetic efficiency of the earth as a whole. Amer. Sci. 32:129–134.Google Scholar
  24. Rodin, L. E., and N. I. Bazilevich. 1966. Production and Mineral Cycling in Terrestrial Vegetation. 288 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  25. ———, ———, and Rozov, N. N. 1975. Productivity of the world’s main ecosystems. In Proceedings of the Seattle Symposium. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Science. (In press.)Google Scholar
  26. Ryther, J. H. 1959. Potential productivity of the sea. Science 130:602–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schroeder, H. 1919. Die jährliche Gesamtproduktion der grünen Pflanzendecke der Erde. Naturwissenschaften 1:8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Steemann Nielsen, E. 1954. On organic production in the oceans. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer. 19:309–328.Google Scholar
  29. ———, and E. Aabye Jensen. 1957. Primary oceanic production. The autotrophic production of organic matter in the oceans. Galathea Rep. 1:49–136.Google Scholar
  30. Sverdrup, H. U. 1955. The place of physical oceanography in oceanographic research. J. Marine Res. 14:287–294.Google Scholar
  31. Whittaker, R. H. 1970. Communities and Ecosystems, 162 pp. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Lieth

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations