Abstract
The years following World War II have witnessed an increasing interest in the effects of growth on trade, the patterns of international specialization, and the terms of trade. On the one hand, some English economists have maintained the Ricardian tradition of diminishing returns, rising food prices and, therefore, declining British terms of trade, while, on the other hand Prebisch, Singer, and other critics have attempted to document and explain a long-run decline in the terms of trade of the underdeveloped countries. Finally, in a reaction to this concentration on a single factor as the determinant of international price movements, a group of economists, began a systematic investigation of the role of growth in trade and the terms of trade using neoclassical assumption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
B. Södersten, A Study of Economic Growth and International Trade, Stockholm, 1964, pp. 149–158.
J. M. Keynes, The Economic Consequences of the Peace, New York, 1920, p. 25.
D. H. Robertson, A Study of Industrial Fluctuation, London, 1948.
U. N., Post-War Price Relations in Trade Between Underdeveloped and Industrialized Countries, New York, 1949.
R. Prebisch, The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems, reprinted in Economic Bulletin for Latin America, February, 1962, pp. 1–22.
H. Singer, “The Distribution of Gains Between Investing and Borrowing Countries,” Papers and Proceedings of the American Economic Association, May, 1950, reprinted in H. Singer, International Development, New York, 1964, pp. 161–172.
See A. Maizels, “Recent Trends in World Trade,” in R. Harrod, International Trade Theory in a Developing World, New York, 1963, pp. 31–38.
C. Kindleberger, The Terms of Trade, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1956, pp. 232–275; C. Kindleberger, Foreign Trade and the National Economy, New Haven, 1962, pp. 99–115.
J. R. Hicks, “An Inaugural Lecture,” Oxford Economic Papers, June, 1953, pp. 112–135.
T. Rybczynski, “Factor Endowment and Relative Commodity. Prices,” Economica, November, 1955, pp. 336–41.
R. Solow, “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, February, 1956, pp. 65–94; T. Swan, “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation,” Economic Record, November, 1956, pp. 334–361.
K. Inada, “On Neoclassical Models of Growth,” Review of Economic Studies, April, 1965, pp. 151–160.
K. Inada, “On the Stability of Growth Equilibria in Two Sector Models,” Review of Economic Studies, April, 1964, pp. 127–142.
K. Inada, “On Neoclassical Models of Economic Growth,” op. cit., pp. 151–160.
H. Oniki and H. Uzawa, “Patterns of Trade and Investment in a Dynamic Model of International Trade,” Review of Economic Studies, January, 1965, pp. 15–38.
P. Bardhan, “Equilibrium Growth in the International Economy,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 1965, pp. 455–464.
J. Stiglitz, “Factor Price Equalization in a Dynamic Economy,” Journal of Political Economy, May/June, 1970, pp. 456–488.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hanson, J.A. (1971). Introduction. In: Growth in Open Economies. Lecture Notes in Operations Research and Mathematical Systems, vol 59. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80664-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80664-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-05671-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80664-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive