Abstract
The building blocks of mathematics are sets, yet no one should say what a set is. An axiomatic treatment of set theory postulates the existence of certain undefined or primitive objects, called sets, together with symbols and axioms governing their use. A graphic analogy can be made with geometry where there are given undefined objects called points, lines, and planes, together with a collection of axioms relating these objects to each other. An axiom of projective geometry is P: If L 1 and L 2 are distinct lines, there is one and only one point P on both L 1 and L 2. Here the relation “P is on L 1” is undefined. Another axiom is P*: If P 1 and P 2 are distinct points, there is one and only one line L on both P 1 and P 2. Any collection of objects which, when properly named as “points” and “lines”, satisfy the axioms of geometry, serve as points and lines, equally as well as any other such collection. It must be possible to replace in all geometric statements the words point, line, plane by table, chair, mug (David Hilbert, quoted by Weyl [44, p. 635]). Nevertheless, from the axioms we soon discover that some objects in a geometry are not “points” and some objects are not “lines”. Analogously in the theory of sets, after we have named our candidates for sets, and listed the undefined symbols and the axioms governing them, we find that not everything in sight is a set. For example, as Cantor observed, there is no such set as “the set of all sets”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
General References
Abian, A.: The Theory of Sets and Transfinite Arithmetic. Philadelphia: Saunders 1965.
Birkhoff, G.: Lattice Theory, Colloquium Publication. Vol. 25 (revised). Amer. Math. Soc., Providence 1948, 1967.
Bourbaki, N.: Theorie des Ensembles. Actualités Scientifiques et Industrielles, Nos. 1212, 1243. Paris: Hermann 1960, 1963, Chapters 1–3.
Cantor, G.: Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers. New York: Dover Publ. 1942.
Cohen, P. J.: Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York: Benjamin 1966.
Cohen, P. J.: The independence of the continuum hypothesis, I, II. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 50, 1143–1148 (1963); 51, 105–110 (1964).
Cohn, P. M.: Universal Algebra. New York: Harper & Row 1965.
Fraenkel, A.: Über den Begriff „definit“ und die Unabhängigkeit des Auswahl axioms. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. wiss. Phil.-math. 1922, 253–257.
Bar-Hillel, Y.: Set Theory. Amsterdam North-Holland Publ. 1958.
Gödel, K.: The Consistency of the Continuum Hypothesis. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1940; 1958.
Halmos, P.: Naive Set Theory. New York: Van Nostrand 1960.
Hausdorff, F.: Set Theory. New York: Chelsea 1957.
Hausdorff, F.: Mengenlehre. Leipzig 1914.
Kamke, E.: Theory of Sets. New York: Dover Publ. 1950.
Kelley, J.: General Topology. New York: Van Nostrand 1955.
Kurosch, A.: Theory of Groups, Vols. 1 and 2. New York: Chelsea 1955, 1956.
Kurosch, A.: Lectures on General Algebra. New York: Chelsea 1963.
Lawvere, F.: Elementary theory of the category of sets. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 52, 1506–1511 (1964).
Lawvere, F.: The category of categories as a foundation for mathematics. Proc. Conf. Categorical Algebra. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. 1965, pp. 1–20.
Sierpinski, W.: L’Hypothèse généralisée du continu et l’axiome du choix. Fund. Math. 24, 1–5 (1947).
Sierpinski, W.: Cardinal and Ordinal Numbers. Monographs of the Polish Academy, Warsaw, 1958.
Solovay, R.: Independence results in the theory of cardinals (Preliminary Report), Notices of the Amer. Math. Soc. 10, 595, (1963).
Zermölo, E.: Beweis, daß jede Menge wohlgeordnet werden kann. Math. Ann. 59, 514–516 (1904).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Springer-Verlag, Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faith, C. (1973). Foreword on Set Theory. In: Algebra. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol 190. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80634-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80634-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80636-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80634-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive