Skip to main content

Galilei-and Lorentz-Invariant Particle Systems and their Conservation Laws

  • Chapter
Problems in the Foundations of Physics

Part of the book series: Studies in the Foundations, Methodology and Philosophy of Science ((FOUNDATION,volume 4))

Abstract

Newton’s mechanics of point particles has served as a model of physical theory for two centuries. In its usual formulation, the forces considered are two-body forces depending on the mutual separation of the particles at the same time. The third law implies that these forces are derivable from a potential also depending only on this separation, which allows a Lagrangean formulation of the theory. As was gradually recognized during the past century, this particular form of Newtonian mechanics is invariant under a ten-parameter group, the inhomogeneous Galilei group [1], and possesses ten integrals which are algebraic functions of the positions and velocities; one of these corresponds to the conservation of energy, three to the conservation of linear momentum, three to the conservation of angular momentum, and three express the uniform motion of the center of mass.

Research Supported in Part by the National Science Foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Klein, F.: Vorlesungen über die Entwicklung der Mathematik im 19. Jahrhundert, vol. 2, ch. 2. Berlin: Springer 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an elementary derivation for the case of gravitational interaction see e. g. R. Kurth, Introduction to the mechanics of stellar systems, ch. III. New York: Pergamon Press 1957

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A detailed discussion is given by A. Wintner, The analytical foundations of celestial mechanics, ch. V. Princeton: Princeton University Press 1947.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Noether, E.: Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl. 235 (1918).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A simplified discussion with examples is given by E. L. Hill, Rev. Modern Phys. 23, 253 (1951)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. for a more general discussion see A. Trautman, in: Gravitation, ed. by L. Witten, ch. 5, New York-London: John Wiley & Sons 1962, or in: Brandeis summer institute in theoretical physics, 1964, vol. 1, ch. 7. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bessel-Hagen, E.: Math. Ann. 84, 258 (1921). This paper includes a slightly more general formulation of Noether’s theorems than stated in Ref. [3]; it too is credited to Noether. We shall use this formulation throughout.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. For a discussion of the historical development of these concepts see Mary B. Hesse, Forces and fields. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For a brief discussion of the physical and conceptual problems see P. Havas, in: Proceedings of the 1964 international congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science, p. 347. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. Co. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Surveys of recent work are given by D.G. Currie and T.F. Jordan in: Lectures in theoretical physics, vol. XA, p.91, New York: Gordon and Breach 1968,

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Hayas, in: Statistical mechanics of equilibrium and non-equilibrium, ed. by J. Meix-ner, p. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. Co. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Havas, P.: Rev. Modern Phys. 36, 938 (1964), and references given there.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. First found for point charges by A.D. Fokker, Z. Physik 58, 386 (1929); compare also

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. Schwarzschild, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl. 126 (1903).

    Google Scholar 

  15. For the case of mesic interactions, see P. Hayas, Phys. Rev. 87,309 (1952), and references given there.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Such a variational principle can be obtained also in a Lorentz-invariant approximation method in the general theory of relativity, as shown by P. Hayas and J. N. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. 128, 398 (1962).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. See P.G. Bergmann in the article on Special Relativity, part Bl, in: Encyclopedia of physics, ed. by S. Flügge, vol. IV. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schütz, J.R.: Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, Math.-Phys. Kl. 110 (1897).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Königsberger, L.: Die Principien der Mechanik. Leipzig: B.G.Teubner 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eisenbud, L., Wigner, E.P.: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 27, 281 (1941).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Houtappel, R. M. F.,Van Dam, H., Wigner, E. P.: Rev. Modern Phys. 37,595 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Houtappel, R. M F Arens, R.: j. Math. Phys. 1, 1341 (1966). n-body forces seem to have been suggested first by G.T. Fechner, Physikalische and Philosophische Atomlehre. Leipzig: H. Mendelssohn 1864.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Havas, P. (to be published).

    Google Scholar 

  24. The presentation of this section substantially is that given by P. Havas and J. Stachel, Phys. Rev. 185, 1636 (1969).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. For an example with infinitely many conservation laws see H. Steudel, Z. Naturforsch. 21A, 1826 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  26. For the specific case of Newton’s law of gravitation, the method and results of this section are due to Bessel-Hagen [5] and can also be found in Hill [4]. The generalization to arbitrary potentials of the form (7) is trivial.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson, C. M., Baeyer, H.C. von (in press). It should be noted that these authors obtained such conservation laws by considering scale transformations of the masses and coupling constants in addition to those of the coordinates, which is not necessary, as just demonstrated.

    Google Scholar 

  28. This result is implicitly contained in H. A. Kastrup, Nucl Phys. 58,561 (1964).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. In the following, corresponding formulae of the Lorentz- and the Galilei case will be designated by L and G, respectively; formulae without a letter hold for both cases.

    Google Scholar 

  30. It should be noted that the Galilean and Lorentzian Fjp (unlike the Fj p) have different dimensions; the same difference appears in the Uijof Eqs.(45) and the Vj of Eq.(48) below. The necessity of such a difference is discussed in Ref. [9].

    Google Scholar 

  31. Havas, P., Plebański, J.: Bull. Amer. Phys. Soc. 5, 433 (1960); see also P. Havas, Ref. [8].

    Google Scholar 

  32. VanDam, H., Wigner, E.P.: Phys. Rev. 138, B 1576 (1965); 142, 838 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  33. For the case of Coulomb’s law this will be discussed elsewhere.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Approximately relativistic Lagrangeans (with correction terms up to order 1/c2) are discussed by P. Havas and J. Stachel (Ref. [19]), by H. Woodcock, Temple University Thesis, 1971, and in several papers in preparation by these authors.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dettman, J.W., Schild, A.: Phys. Rev. 95, 1057 (1954).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. For Fokker’s principle in electrodynamics (Ref. [10]), the conservation law (56) was derived by J.A. Wheeler and R.P. Feynman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 425 (1949).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Havas, P.: Phys. Rev. 87, 898 (1952).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fokker, A.D.: Physica 9, 33 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  39. In electrodynamics this was shown first by J. Frenkel, Z. Physik 32, 518 (1925)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. J. L. Synge, Trans. Roy. Soc. Can. 34, 1 (1940); an alternate form of the energy-momentum tensor was suggested in Ref. [31]. The results were generalized to mesodynamics in Ref. [11].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Wheeler, J. A., Feynman, R.P.: Rev. Modern Phys. 17, 157 (1945);

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. see also P. Havas, Phys. Rev. 74, 456 (1948); 86, 974 (1952).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Havas, P.: Phys. Rev. 91, 997 (1953), and a paper in preparation.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Havas, P. (1971). Galilei-and Lorentz-Invariant Particle Systems and their Conservation Laws. In: Bunge, M. (eds) Problems in the Foundations of Physics. Studies in the Foundations, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80624-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80624-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80626-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80624-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics