Mechanics of Powder Compaction

  • Ch. PavanaChand
  • R. KrishnaKumar
Conference paper


In this work mechanics of metal powder compaction are investigated using a micromechanics based approach. Close packed arrangements under plane strain condition with two different starting relative densities are considered. These unit cells are studied for basic densification response in the relative density range 0.78 – 0.98. The material parameters are computed from the plane strain form of Shima and Oyane yield function[1] and are found to be in good agreement with the experimental results reported for Copper powder. This method allows us explain the yield function parameters from the mechanics of particle deformation. Initial pore shape, loading path, and material hardening are found to influence the yield function parameters and hence the yield surface at a given relative density. These studies show that the initial and evolving pore structure during densification is responsible for the path dependency of the macroscopic yield behavior.


Relative Density Yield Surface Load Case Copper Powder Macroscopic Stress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S.Shima and O.Oyane, Int.J.Mech.Sci., 18, 285–291 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.Shima and T.Nakanishi, Computational Plasticity, Current Japanese Materials Research, 7.117–133 (eds. T.Inoue, H.Kitagawa and S.Shima -Elsevier Applied Science, 1990).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.T.Gethin, R.W.Lewis, D.V.Tran and J.G.Ashoka, Advances in Powder Metallurgy & Particulate Materials, 11–27, Compiled by J.M.Capus and R.M. German. (1992)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.M.Doraivelu, H.L.Gegel, J.S.Gunasekera, J.C Malas, J.T.Morgan and J.F Thomas, Int.J.Mech.Sci., 26, 527–535. (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    RJ.Green, Int.J.Mech.Sci., 14, 215–224. (1972)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.N.Lee and H.S.Kim, Powder Metallurgy., 35, 275–279. (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.Shima and K.Mimura, Int.J.Mech.Sci., 28, 53–59 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.L.Gurson and T.J.McCabe, Compaction and Other Consolidation Processes, Advances in Powder Metallurgy & Particulate materials, 2, 133–145, Compiled by J.M. Capus and R.M. German. (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N.A.Fleck, J.Mech.Phy.Solids, 43, 1409–1431 (1995)MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.Shima and M.A.E.Saleh, Mechanics of materials, 16, 73–81 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.A.Fleck, L.T.Kuhn and R.M.McMeeking, J.Mech.Phy.Solids, 40, 1139–1162 (1992)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    N.Ogbonna and N.A.Fleck, Acta Metall. Mater., 43, 603–620 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.R.Akisanya, and A.C.F.Cocks, J.Mech.Phy.Solids, 43, 605–636 (1995)ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T.J.Watson and J.A.Wert, Metallurgical Transactions A, 24A, 2071–2081 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    B.Anil, Ch.PavanaChand and R.Krishnakumar, Int. J. Engg. Anal. Design, (to appear,1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ch.PavanaChand and R.Krishnakumar, Commu. in Numer. Meth. in Engg., (to appear, 1996).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ch.PavanaChand and R.Krishnakumar, Scripta Metall. Mater.(to appear, 1996).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ch.PavanaChand and R.Krishnakumar, Acta Metall. Mater.(to appear, 1996).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.W.Zimmermann, Trans. ASME, J. App. Mech. 53, 500–504 (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ch. PavanaChand
    • 1
  • R. KrishnaKumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of TechnologyMadrasIndia

Personalised recommendations