Skip to main content

Small effects: Subgroup analysis and interaction

  • Conference paper
Epidemiological Practices in Research on Small Effects
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

It is common in epidemiologic studies to investigate relationships between exposure and disease, both in the entire study population and in strata or subgroups. Also in situations where the effect in the entire study population, sometimes referred to as the main effect, is absent or small, is it common practice to continue with subgroup analysis. One rationale for looking at effects in subgroups is that there may be segments of the population in which people have an increased susceptibility and in which an effect of the exposure may be strong or at least easier to detect. There may also be methodological differences across segments of the population that make it easier to detect relations in some parts of the population than in others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Feychting M & Ahlbom A (1993) Magnetic fields and cancer in children residing near Swedish high voltage power lines. American Journal of Epidemiology 138: 467–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hatch M (1995) What can we infer from findings in subgroups? Epidemiology 6: 473–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallqvist J, Ahlbom A, Diderichsen F, Reuterwall C (1996) How to evaluate interaction between causes: a review of practices in cardiovascular epidemiology. Journal of Internal Medicine 239: 377–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li DK, Checkoway H, Mueller BA (1995) Electric blanket use during pregnancy in relation to the risk of congential urinary tract anomalies among women with a history of subfertility. Epidemiology 6: 485–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothman KJ (1976) Causes. American Journal of Epidemiology 104: 587–592

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shields PG, Harris CC (1991) Molecular epidemiology and the genetics of environmental cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 266: 681–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ahlbom, A. (1998). Small effects: Subgroup analysis and interaction. In: Hoffmeister, H., Szklo, M., Thamm, M. (eds) Epidemiological Practices in Research on Small Effects. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80463-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80463-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80465-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80463-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics