Skip to main content
  • 82 Accesses

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy of women in North America and is the leading cause of death in women between the ages of 40 and 55. In 1995 approximately 182 000 women in the United States will have been diagnosed with breast cancer, and 46 000 women will die of this disease [20].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler LP, Crowe JP, Al-Kaisi NK, Sunshine JL (1993) Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with F-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. Radiology 187:743–750

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Balon HR, Fink-Bennett D, Stoffer SS (1992) Tc-99m sestamibi uptake by recurrent Hunthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid. J Nucl Med 33:1393–1395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassa P, Kim EE, Inoue T, Wiong FCL, Korkmaz M, Yang DJ, Wong W-H, Hicks KW, Buzdar AU, Podoloff DA (1996) Evaluation of preoperative chemotherapy using PET with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 37:931–938

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bird R, Wallace T, Yankaskas B (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613–617

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JHCL, Ruys SHJ (1995) Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 197:743–747

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dehdashti F, Mortimer JE, Siegel BA, Griffieth LK, Bonasera TJ, Fusselman MJ, Detert DD, Cutler D, Katzenellenbogan JA, Welch MJ (1995) Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. J Nucl Med 36:1766–1774

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harms SE, Flaming DP, Hesley KL (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 187:493–501

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawkins RA, Hoh C, Dahlbom M (1991) PET cancer evaluation with FDG. J Nucl Med 32:1555–1558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Inoue T, Kim EE, Wallace S, Yang DJ, Wong FCL, Bassa P, Cherif A, Delpassand E, Buzdar A, Podoloff DA (1996) PET using F-18 fluorotamoxifen to evaluate therapeutic responses in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Biotherapy Radiopharm 11:235–245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson V (1990) The role of US in breast imaging. Radiology 177:305–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Khalkhali I, Cutrone JA, Mena IG, Diggles IE, Venegas RJ, Vargas HI, Jackson BL, Khalkhali S, Moss JF, Klein SR (1995) Scintimammography: the complementary role of Tc-99m sestamibi prone breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Radiology 196:421–426

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kopans DB (1992) The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR 158:521–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maublant J, de Latour M, Mestas D, Clemenson A, Charrier S, Feillel V (1996) Tc-99m sestamibi uptake in breast tumor and associated lymph nodes. J Nucl Med 37:922–925

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McLean RG, Ege GN (1986) Prognostic value of axillary lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer patients. J Nucl Med 27:1116–1124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Piccolo S, Lastoria S, Mainolfi C, Muto P, Bazzicalupo L, Salvatore M (1995) Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate scintimammography to image primary breast cancer. J Nucl Med 36:718–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taillefer R, Robidoux A, Lambert R, Turpin S, Laperriere J (1995) Tc-99m sestamibi prone scintimammography to detect primary breast cancer and axillary lymph node involvement. J Nucl Med 36:1758–1765

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Uren RF Howman-Giles RB, Thompson JF, Malouf D, Ramsey-Stewart G, Niesche FW, Renwick SB (1995) Mammary lymphoscintigraphy in breast cancer. J Nucl Med 36:1775–1780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wahl RL, Cody R, Fisher S (1991) FDG uptake before and after estrogen receptor stimulation: feasibility studies for functional receptor imaging. J Nucl Med 32:1011–1015

    Google Scholar 

  19. Waxman AD, Ramanna L, Memsic LD (1993) Thallium scintigraphy in the evaluation of mass abnormalities of the breast. J Nucl Med 34:18–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wingo PA, Tong T, Bolden S (1995) Cancer statistics. Cancer 5:8–30

    Google Scholar 

  21. Worsley DF, Lentle BC (1993) Uptake ofi Tc-99m MDP in primary amyloidosis with a review of the mechanisms of soft-tissue localization of bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med 34:1612–1615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, E.E. (1998). Breast Cancer. In: Nuclear Imaging of the Chest. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80387-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-80387-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-80389-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-80387-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics