Bringing ITS to the Marketplace: A Successful Experiment in Minimalist Design

  • Carl Gutwin
  • Marlene Jones
  • Patrick Brackett
  • Kim Massie Adolphe


Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) have proven to be effective tools for teaching and training. However, ITSs have not become common in industrial and organisational settings, in part because their complexity has proven difficult to manage outside of the research lab. Minimalist ITSs are an attempt to bridge the gap between research and practical application; they simplify research techniques while striving to maintain as much pedagogic intelligence as possible. This paper describes one such system, SWIFT, that is an example of how a minimalist ITS can be delivered as a commercial product. We outline some of the issues facing designers of a minimalist system, and describe the ways that research techniques have been incorporated into four modules of SWIFT: adaptive testing, course planning, guidance, and diagnosis.


Adaptive Testing Minimalist System Intelligent Tutor System Instructional Planning Minimalist Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Ayala & Yano, 1994]
    Ayala, G. and Yano, Y. (1994) Design Issues in a Collaborative Learning Environment for Japanese Language Patterns. Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, AACE, 67–72.Google Scholar
  2. [Brecht, 1990]
    Brecht (Wasson), B. (1990) Determining the Focus of Instruction: Content Planning for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
  3. [Brusilovsky et al., 1994]
    Brusilovsky, P., van Marcke, K., Murray, T., Major, N. and Vassileva, J. (1994) Minimalist ITS. Panel Discussion, Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, AACE.Google Scholar
  4. [Derry & Murphy, 1986]
    Deny, S., and Murphy, D.A., (1986), Designing Systems that Train Learning Ability: From Theory to Practice. Review of Educational Research, 56 (1), 1–39.Google Scholar
  5. [Derry, 1992]
    Derry, S. (1992) Metacognitive Models of Learning and Instructional System Design. In Adaptive Learning Environments: Foundations and Frontiers, M. Jones and P. Winne ed. Springer-Verlag. 257–286.Google Scholar
  6. [Elsom-Cook, 1990]
    Elsom-Cook, M. (1990) Guided Discovery Tutoring. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. [Johnson & Soloway, 1985]
    Johnson, W. L. and Soloway, E. (1985) PROUST: An Automatic Debugger for Pascal Programs. Byte, 10 (4), 179–190.Google Scholar
  8. [Jones, 1992]
    Jones, M. (1992) Introduction. In Adaptive Learning Environments: Foundations and Frontiers, M. Jones and P. Winne ed., Springer-Verlag, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [Major, 1994]
    Major, N. (1994) Evaluating COCA - What do teachers think? Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, AACE, 361–366.Google Scholar
  10. [Major & Reichgelt, 1992]
    Major, N. and Reichgelt, H. (1992) COCA: A Shell for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, 523–530.Google Scholar
  11. [Massie, 1994]
    Massie Adolphe, K. (1994) AI and Education. Canadian AI Magazine, 34 (1), 4 - 8.Google Scholar
  12. [McCalla & Greer, 1990]
    McCalla, G. I. and Greer, J. E. (1990) SCENT-3: An architecture for intelligent advising in problem-solving domains. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education, C. Frasson and G. Gauthier eds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 140–161Google Scholar
  13. [McCalla & Greer 1994]
    McCalla, G.I, and Greer, J.E. (1994), Granularity-Based Reasoning and Belief Revision in Student Models, In Student Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction, J. Greer and G. McCalla, Springer-Verlag, 39–62.Google Scholar
  14. [Murray & Woolf, 1992]
    Murray, T. and Woolf, B. (1992) Tools for Teacher Participation in ITS Design. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Springer-Verlag, 593v600.Google Scholar
  15. [Pressley et al., 1989]
    Pressley, M., Johnson, C., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J., Kurita, J., (1989), Strategies That Improve Children’s Memory and Comprehension of Text. The Elementary School Journal, 90 (1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [Shuell, 1992]
    Shuell, T. J. (1992) Designing Instructional Computing Systems for Meaningful Learning. In Adaptive Learning Environments: Foundations and Frontiers, M. Jones and P. Winne ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [Shute, 1990]
    Shute, V. (1990) Rose Garden Promises of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Blossom or Thorn?, Space Operations, Applications and Research (SOAR) Symposium, June 1990, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  18. [Shute, 1994]
    Shute, V. (1994) Regarding the I in ITS: Student Modelling. In Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, AACE, 50–57.Google Scholar
  19. [Shute & Glaser 1994]
    Shute, V. J. and Glaser, R. (1990) A Large-scale Evaluation of an Intelligent Discovery World: Smithtown. Interactive Learning Environments, 1 (1), 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [van Marcke, 1990]
    van Marcke, K. (1990) “A Generic Tutoring Environment.” The European Conference on Artifical Intelligence, 655–660.Google Scholar
  21. [Welch & Frick 1993]
    Welch, R.E., and Frick, T.W. (1993), Computerized-Adaptive Testing in Instructional Settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41 (3), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [Winne, 1992]
    Winne, P. (1992) State-of-the-Art Instructional Computing Systems that Afford Instruction and Bootstrap Research. In Adaptive Learning Environments: Foundations and Frontiers, M. Jones and P. Winne ed., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 349–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [Winne et al., 1992]
    Winne, P., Butler, D., McGinn, M., Sugarman, J., Jones, M., Mark, M., and Field, D. (1992) STUDY: A Tool for Authoring Adaptive Learning Environments and for Advancing Instructional Research. In Appendix to Proceedings of ITS’92.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Pub. Co. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl Gutwin
    • 1
  • Marlene Jones
    • 1
  • Patrick Brackett
    • 2
  • Kim Massie Adolphe
    • 2
  1. 1.Alberta Research CouncilCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Gemini Learning Systems Inc.CalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations