Fragrances pp 66-75 | Cite as

Fragrances as a Cause of Contact Dermatitis in Cosmetics: Clinical Aspects and Epidemiological Data

  • A. C. De Groot
  • P. J. Frosch


Perfumes are so much a part of our culture that we take them for granted, but if they were suddenly taken from us, society would suffer immeasurably. We do pay a price for their service, and part of that concerns dermatological and other medical reactions.


Atopic Dermatitis Contact Dermatitis Allergic Contact Dermatitis Contact Allergy Hand Eczema 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fischer T (1995) Perfumed products. In: Guin JD (ed) Practical contact dermatitis. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 355–371Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Groot AC, Beverdam E, Tjong Ayong C, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP (1988) The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries. Contact Dermatitis 19:195–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Westat Inc (1975) An investigation of consumers’ perceptions of adverse reactions to cosmetic products. National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morren MA, Rodrigues R, Dooms-Goossens A et al. (1992) Connubial contact dermatitis: a review. Eur J Dermatol 2:219–223Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dooms-Goossens A, Deleu H (1991) Airborne contact dermatitis: an update. Contact Dermatitis 25:211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guin JD, Berry VK (1980) Perfume sensitivity in adults females. A study of contact sensitivity to a perfume mix in two groups of student nurses. J Am Acad Dermatol 3:299–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Groot AC, Nater JP, van der Lende R, Rijcken B (1987) Adverse effects of cosmetics: a retrospective study in the general population. Int J Cosmet Sci 9:255–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berne B, Boström Å, Grahnén AF, Tammela M (1996) Adverse effects of cosmetics and toiletries reported to the Swedish Medical Product Agency 1989–1994. Contact Dermatitis 34:359–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dooms-Goossens A, Kerre S, Drieghe J, Bossuyt L, Degreef H (1992) Cosmetic products and their allergens. Eur J Dermatol 2:465–468Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Groot AC, Weyland JW, Nater JP (1994) Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 442–451Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nielsen NH, Menné T (1992) Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 72:456–460Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edman B (1994) The influence of shaving method on perfume allergy. Contact Dermatitis 31:291–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsen W, Nakayama H, Lindberg M et al. (1996) Fragrance contact dermatitis. A worldwide multicenter investigation. I.Am J Contact Dermatitis 7:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meynadier JM, Meynadier J, Peyron JL, Peyron L (1986) Formes cliniques des manifestations cutanées d’allergie aux parfums. Ann Dermatol Venereol 113:31–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Santucci B, Cristaudo A, Cannistraci C, Picardo M (1987) Contact dermatitis to fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 16:93–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malten KE, van Ketel WG, Nater JP, Liem DH (1984) Reactions in selected patients to 22 fragrance materials. Contact Dermatitis 11:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Christophersen J, Menné T, Tanghøi P et al. (1989) Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Contact Dermatitis 21:291–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rothenborg HW, Menné T, Sjølin K-E (1977) Temperature dependent primary irritant dermatitis from lemon perfume. Contact Dermatitis 3:37–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cronin E (1984) Photosensitivity to musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 11:88–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaidbey KH, Kligman AM (1981) Photosensitization to coumarin derivatives. Arch Dermatol 117:258–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Addo HA, Ferguson J, Johnson BE, Frain-Bell W (1982) The relationship between exposure to fragrance materials and persistent light reactions in the photosensitivity dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 107:261–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Menagé H du P, Ross JS, Norris PG, Hawk JLM, White IR (1995) Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis; sesquiterpene lactone mix is an important allergen. Br J Dermatol 132:543–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Safford RJ, Basketter DA, Allenby CF, Goodwin BFJ (1990) Immediate contact reactions to chemicals in the fragrance mix and a study of the quenching action of eugenol. Br J Dermatol 123:595–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nakayama H, Matsuo S, Hayakawa K et al. (1984) Pigmented cosmetic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol 23:299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zaynoun ST, Aftimas BA, Tenekjian KK, Kurban AK (1981) Berloque dermatitis — a continuing cosmetic problem. Contact Dermatitis 7:111–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hayakawa R, Matsunaga K, Arima Y (1987) Depigmented contact dermatitis due to incense. Contact Dermatitis 16:272–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goh CL, Ng SK (1988) Bullous contact allergy from cinnamon. Dermatosen 36: 186–187Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thompson JA Jr, Wansker BA (1981) A case of contact dermatitis, erythema multiforme, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 5:666–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schleuter DP (1978) Airway response to hair spray in normal subjects and subjects with hyperreactive airways. Chest 75:544–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. De Groot
  • P. J. Frosch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations