National Growth and Regional Income Inequality: Further Results

  • Noboru Sakashita
  • Osamu Kamoike


An econometric model of interregional growth originated by Fukuchi and Nobukuni [1] has been criticized and revised in a recent paper by the present authors with some interesting conclusions. (See Sakashita and Kamoike [2]). In this note, additional results which have been obtained with regard to our interregional growth model are reported. We use the same notation as Fukuchi-Nobukuni [1] and Saka-shita-Kamoike [2].


Capital Stock Public Investment Public Capital Private Capital Regional Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Fukuchi, T. and M. Nobukuni. “An Econometric Analysis of National Growth and Regional Income Inequality,” International Economic Review, 11 (1970), 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Sakashita, N. and O. Kamoike. “National Growth and Regional Income Inequality: A Consistent Model,” Discussion Paper No. 68, The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, July, 1971. See also International Economic Review, 14 (1973), 372–382.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Solow, R. M. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1956), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noboru Sakashita
  • Osamu Kamoike
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Social and Economic ResearchOsaka UniversityJapan
  2. 2.University of BirminghamUK
  3. 3.Tohoku UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations