STM Imaging of Single-Atom Adsorbates on Metals
Consider the imaging of a single atom adsorbed on a metal surface in the STM. Ideally, the STM tip will also be one atom adsorbed on a group of other metal atoms. For theoretical purposes, we will model this system using two flat metallic electrodes, each of which has a single atom adsorbed on its surface, with one representing the tip and the other the sample. If we calculate the current that flows between these electrodes when a bias voltage is applied between them, then we can study theoretically many of the basic physical aspects of STM imaging.
KeywordsFermi Level State Density Lateral Separation Jellium Model Left Electrode
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.1For a discussion of the jellium model, see e.g. N.D. Lang: Density functional approach to the electronic structure of metal surfaces and metal-adsorbate systems, in Theory of the In-homogeneous Electron Gas, ed. by S. Lundqvist, N.H. March (Plenum, New York, 1983), pp. 309–389, or N.D. Lang: The density-functional formalism and the electronic structure of metal surfaces, in Solid State Physics, 28, 225–300 (Academic, New York, 1973). The calculations shown in this article are all for a positive background density n̄ such that r s = 2 bohr, where (4/3)πrs3 ≡ n̄ ̄ 1. This corresponds to a typical high-electron-density metal.Google Scholar
- 2.3J. Tersoff, D.R. Hamann: Phys. Rev. B 31, 805 (1985); Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1998 (1983)Google Scholar
- 2.6N.D. Lang: Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 230 and 2925 (E) (1985)Google Scholar
- 2.9N.D. Lang: Comments Cond. Mat. Phys. 14, 253 (1989)Google Scholar
- 2.13J.A. Stroscio, R.M. Feenstra, A.P. Fein: Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2579 (1986); but regarding the role of tip electronic structure in spectroscopy, see by contrast R.M. Tromp, E.J. van Loenen, J.E. Demuth, N.D. Lang: Phys. Rev. B 37, 9042 (1988), where an important tip contribution was observed.Google Scholar
- 2.17Y. Kuk, P.J. Silverman: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 289 (1990). Regarding the role of d states, see also discussion in J.E. Demuth, U. Koehler, R.J. Hamers: J. Microscopy 152, 299 (1988).Google Scholar
- 2.19J.K. Gimzewski, R. Möller: Phys. Rev. B 36, 1284 (1987); and data of Gimzewski and Möller reproduced in [2.18]Google Scholar
- 2.20Y. Imry: Physics of mesoscopic systems, in Directions in Condensed Matter Physics: Memorial Volume in Honor of Shang-keng Ma, ed. by G. Grinstein, G. Mazenko (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986), pp. 101–163; R. Landauer: Z. Phys. B 68, 217 (1987)Google Scholar
- 2.22G. Binnig, H. Rohrer: Surf. Sci. 126, 236 (1983); R. Wiesendanger, L. Eng, H.R. Hidber, P. Oelhafen, L. Rosenthaler, U. Staufer, H.-J. Guntherodt: Surf. Sci. 189/190, 24 (1987); B. Marchon, P. Bernhardt, M. E. Bussell, G.A. Somorjai, M. Salmeron, W. Siekhaus: Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1166 (1988)Google Scholar