Skip to main content

An Overview and Recent Developments in Dual Scaling

  • Conference paper
From Data to Knowledge
  • 416 Accesses

Summary

Dual scaling quantifies such categorical data as contingency tables, multiple-choice data, sorting data, paired comparison data, rank-order data, and successive categories data. These data can be classified into two types, incidence data and dominance data. The present study is an overview of some key formulas and several conceptual problems, which require further investigations. Most of them are peculiar to data types, and some remedial procedures are suggested for them as interim measures. Awareness of these difficulties in dual scaling and other related methods seems to be the most notable recent development.

This study was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to S. Nishisato.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AHN, H. (1991): Effects of missing responses in multiple choice data on dual scaling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENZCRI, J.-P. (1979): Sur le caicul des taux d’inertie dans Panaiyse d’un questionnaire. Cahiers de VAnalyse des Dowries, 4, 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • BENZCRI, J.-P. et al. (1973): L’Anaiyse des donnes: II. L’AnaJyse des correspondances. Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J.D., GREEN, P.E. and SCHAFFER, C.M. (1986): Interpoint distance comparisons in correspondence analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 23, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J.D., GREEN, P.E. and SCHAFFER, C.M. (1987): Comparing inter– point distances in correspondence analysis: A clarification. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CARROLL, J.D., GREEN, P.E. and SCHAFFER, C.M. (1989): Reply to Green– acre’s commentary on the Carroll-Green-Schaffer scaling of two-way correspondence analysis solutions. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 366–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRONBACH, L.J. (1951): Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GREENACRE, M.J. (1987): Measuring total variation and its components in multiple correspondence analysis. Murray Hill, NJ, AT&T Bell Laboratories Statistical Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • GREENACRE, M.J. (1989): The Carroll-Green-Schaffer scaling in correspondence analysis: A theoretical and empirical appraisal.Journal of Marketing Research;, 26, 358–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LORD, F.M. (1958): Some relations between Guttman’s principal components of scale analysis and other psychometric theory.Psychometrika, 23, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1980): Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1984): Forced classification: A simple application of a quantification technique. Psychometrika, 49, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1987): Robust techniques for quantifying categorical data. In: LB. McNeil and G.J. Umphrey (eds.): Foundations of Statistical Inference. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1990): Dual scaling of designed experiments. In M. Schader and W. Gaul (eds.): Knowledge, Data and Computer-Assisted Decisions. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1993): On quantifying different types of categorical data. Psychometrika, 58, 617–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. (1994): Elements of dual scaling: An introduction to practical data analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. and AHN, H. (1994): When not to analyze data: Decision making on missing responses in dual scaling. Annals of Operations Research (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. and NISHISATO, I. (1984): An introduction to dual scaling. Toronto: MicroStats.

    Google Scholar 

  • NISHISATO, S. and SHEU, W.J. (1980): Piecewise method of reciprocal averages for dual scaling of multiple-choice data. Psychometrika, 45, 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VAN BUUREN, S. and VAN RIJCKEVORSEL, J.L.A. (1992): Imputation of missing categorical data by maximizing internal consistency. Psychometrika, 57, 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nishisato, S. (1996). An Overview and Recent Developments in Dual Scaling. In: Gaul, W., Pfeifer, D. (eds) From Data to Knowledge. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79999-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79999-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60354-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79999-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics