Is There a Need for a New Detection Technique for Breast Cancer?

  • Volker Barth
  • Johannes Herrmann
Conference paper
Part of the ESO Monographs book series (ESO MONOGRAPHS)


In West Germany, 25,000 women every year are diagnosed as having breast cancer, and 13,000 die from this disease. One out of every 13 women will be diagnosed with this cancer in her lifetime.


Breast Cancer Dense Breast Intraductal Papilloma Nonpalpable Breast Lesion Fibrocystic Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Frischbier HJ, Hoeffken W, Robra BP: Mammographie in der Krebsfrüherkennung. Ergebnisse der Deutschen Mammographie-Studie. Enke-Verlag, Stuttgart 1994Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barth V: Mammographie: Intensivkurs und Atlas für Fortgeschrittene. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart 1994Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tubiana M, Holland R, Kopans DB et al: Advisory Report of the European School of Oncology to the Commission of the European Communities “Europe Against Cancer“ Programme. Advisory Report 1993Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM: Nonpalpable breast lesions: Findings of stereotaxic core-needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991 (181):745–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT: Nonpalpable breast lesions: Correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993 (188):453–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans PW: Fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy of non-palpable breast lesions. Curr Op Radiol 1992 (4):130–138Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Minkowitz S, Moskowitz M, Khafif RA, Alderete MN: Tru-cut needle biopsy of the breast: An analysis of its specificity and sensitivity. Cancer 1986 (57): 320–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malley F, Casey TT, Winfield AC, Rodgers WH, Sawyers J, Page DL: Clinical correlates of false negative fine needle aspirations of the breast in a consecutive series of 1,005 patients. Surg Gyn Obstet 1993 (176):360–364Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas BA and Price JL: The place of clinical examinations in breast cancer screening. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam 1989:11–24Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cardona G, Cataliotta L, Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M: Reasons for failure of physical examination in breast cancer detection (analysis of 232 false- negative cases). Tumori 1983 (69):531–537PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ciatto S, Rosselli del Turco M, Catarzi S, Cataliotti L, Cardona G, Teglia C, Pacini P, Caridi G: Causes of breast cancer misdiagnosis at physical examination. Neoplasm 1991 (38):523–531Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Donegan WL: Evaluation of a palpable breast mass. New Engl J Med 1992 (327):937–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rozner D and Blaird D: What ultrasonography can tell in breast masses that mammography and physical examination cannot. J Surg Oncol 1985 (28): 308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sickles EA, Filly FA, Callen PW: Breast cancer detection with sonography and mammography: comparison using state-of-the-art equipment. AJR 1983 (140):843–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karsell PR: Computerized tomographic mammography. JNCI 1976 (5):8–12Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL et al: Fat suppressed three-dimensional MR imaging of the breast. Radiographics 1993 (13):247–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hickman PF, Moore NR, Shepstone BJ: The indeterminate breast mass: assessment using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1994 (67): 14–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heywang-Kobrunner SH: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Prog Clin Radiol 1994 (29):94–104Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Khalkhali I, Mena I, Diggles L: Review of imaging techniques for the diagnosis of breast cancer: a new role of prone scintimammography using technetium-99m sestamibi. Eur J Nucl Med 1994 (21):357–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Barth
    • 1
  • Johannes Herrmann
    • 1
  1. 1.The Central Radiological InstituteEsslingen am NeckarGermany

Personalised recommendations