Abstract
In this chapter, we examine a logit model designed specifically for spatial choice among aggregate destinations. Typically, the logit and gravity models are applied to problems of spatial interaction without due consideration for the aggregation scale of the data. There is of course a general awareness that models estimated at different levels of aggregation will yield different parameter estimates but most researchers proceed directly with their analysis at the aggregate level and make no adjustments. Research on aggregation issues has been intertwined with work on the ‘modifiable areal unit problem’. This research examines how spatial Statistical models and diagnostics are affected by the aggregation scale and spatial configuration of spatial units. Choice processes per se, as are present in all problems of spatial interaction, are not specifically addressed in this body of research. Rather the focus is on the univariate or bivariate spatial processes associated with one or two spatially-referenced attributes [Openshaw (1984) and Arbia (1989)]. Aggregation issues are relevant in both scenarios but as will be illustrated in this chapter, the theoretical framework to accommodate aggregation in a choice context is quite different from that considered in analysis of the modifiable areal unit problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amrhein, C.G. and R. Flowerdew, The Effect of Data Aggregation on a Poisson Regression Model of Canadian Migration,Environment and Flanning A, 1381–1391, 1992.
Anas, A., Discrete Choice Theory, Information Theory and the Multinomial Logit and Gravity Models,Transportation Research B, 17, 13–23, 1983.
Anderson, W.P. and Y.Y. Papageorgiou, An Analysis of Migration Flows for the Canadian System 1952–1983: 1. Migration Probabilities,Geographical Analysis, 26, 15–36, 1994.
Arbia, G.,Spatial Data Configuration in Statistical Analysis of Regional Economic and Related Problems, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.
Batty, M. and P.K. Sikdar, Spatial Aggregation in Gravity Models: 1. an Information Theoretic Approach,Environment and Planning A, 14, 377–405, 1982a.
Batty, M. and P.K. Sikdar, Spatial Aggregation in Gravity Models: 2. One Dimensional Population Density Models,Environment and Planning A, 14, 525–553, 1982b.
Batty, M. and P.K. Sikdar, Spatial Aggregation in Gravity Models: 3. Two-dimensional Trip Distribution and Location Models,Environment and Planning A, 14, 629–658, 1982c.
Batty, M. and P.K. Sikdar, Spatial Aggregation in Gravity Models: 4. Generalisations and Large Scale Applications,Environment and Planning A, 14, 795–822, 1982d.
Bolduc D., M.G. Dagenais and M.J. Gaudry, Spatially Autocorrelated Errors in Origin-Destination Models: A New Specification Applied to Aggregate Mode Choice,Transportation Research, 25B, 1–12, 1989.
Borgers, A. and H. Timmermans, Choice Model Specification, Substitution and Spatial Structure Effects,Regional Science and Urban Economics, 17, 29–47, 1987.
Cramer, J.S.,The Logit Model: An Introduction for Economists, London: Edward Arnold, 1991.
Day, K.M., Inter-Provincial Migration and Local Public Goods,Canadian Journal of Economics, 25, 123–142, 1992.
Fischer M.M. and E. Aufhauser, Housing Choice in a Regulated Market,Geographical Analysis, 20, 47–69, 1988.
Fotheringham, A.S., Spatial Structure and Distance-Decay Parameters,Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 71, 425–436, 1981.
Fotheringham, A.S., A New Set of Spatial Interaction Models: The Theory of Competing Destinations,Environment and Planning A, 15, 15–36, 1983.
Griffith, D.A. and K.G. Jones, Exploration Into the Relationship between Spatial Structure and Spatial Interaction,Environment and Planning A, 12, 187–201, 1980.
Haynes, K.E. and A.S. Fotheringham, The Impact of Space on the Application of Discrete Choice Models,The Review of Regional Studies, 20, 39–49, 1990.
Kitamura, R., L.P. Kostyniuk and K. Ting, Aggregation in Spatial Choice Modeling,Transportation Science, 13, 325–342, 1979.
Lerman, S.R.,A Disaggregate Behavioral Model of Urban Mobility Decisions, PhD dissertation, Cambridge: Department of Civil Engineering, MIT, 1975.
Liaw, K.L. and J. Ledent, Joint Effects of Ecological and Personal Factors on Elderly Interprovincial Migration in Canada,Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 11, 77–100, 1988.
Liaw, K.L., Joint Effects of Personal Factors and Ecological Variables on the Interprovincial Migration Patterns of Young Adults in Canada,Geographical Analysis, 22, 189–208, 1990.
Lo, L., Substitutability, Spatial Structure and Spatial Interaction,Geographical Analysis, 23, 132–146, 1991.
Lo, L .,Unbiased Distance Parameter: Illusion or Solution, Paper presented at the June 1993 meetings of the Canadian Association of Geographers, Ottawa, Canada, 1993.
McFadden, D., Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in: P. Zarembka (ed.),Frontiers of Econometrics, New York: Academic Press, 1974.
McFadden, D., Modelling the Choice of Residential Location, in: A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars and J.W. Weibull (eds.),Spatial Interaction Theory and Flanning Models, Amsterdam: North Holland, 1978.
McMillen, D.P., Probit with Spatial Autocorrelation,Journal of Regional Science, 32, 335–348, 1992.
Openshaw, S., Ecological Fallacies and the Analysis of Areal Census Data,Environment and Flanning A, 16, 17–31, 1984.
Putman, S.H. and S.H. Chung, Effects of Spatial System Design on Spatial Interaction Models. 1: The Spatial System Definition Problem,Environment and Flanning A, 21, 27–46, 1989.
Schwab, M.G. and T.R. Smith, Functional Invariance Under Spatial Aggregation from Continuous Spatial Interaction Models,Geographical Analysis, 17, 217–230, 1985.
Tardiff, T.J., Definition of Alternatives and Representation of Dynamic Behavior in Spatial Choice Models,Transportation Research Record, 775, 25–30, 1980.
Thill, J.C., Choice Set Formation for Destination Choice Modelling,Progress in Human Geography, 16, 361–382, 1992.
Webber, M.J., A Theoretical Analysis of Aggregation in Spatial Interaction Models,Geographical Analysis, 12, 129–141, 1980.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferguson, M.R., Kanaroglou, P.S. (1995). Utility Variability within Aggregate Spatial Units and its Relevance to Discrete Models of Destination Choice. In: Anselin, L., Florax, R.J.G.M. (eds) New Directions in Spatial Econometrics. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79877-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79877-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79879-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79877-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive