Skip to main content

In Vitro Skin Irritation Assays: Relevance to Human Skin

  • Conference paper
Modulation of Cellular Responses in Toxicity

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((ASIH,volume 93))

Abstract

The events occurring in primary skin irritation in vivo represent a complex series of chemical and physiological changes. Animals have been used to assess dermal irritation by observation of visible changes ranging from erythema and edema to corrosion and ulceration in the in vivo Draize rabbit skin test accepted by many regulatory agencies [Draize et al., 1944]. These responses, easily observed, are produced by diverse mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagley DM, Rizva PY, Kong BM, et al. (1988) An improved CAM assay for predicting ocular irritation potential. In: Alterna~ive Methods in Toxicology, Vol 6, Goldberg AM, ed., New York: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc, 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bason MM, Harvell J, Realica B, Gordon V, Maibach HI (1992) Comparison of In vitro and In vivo derrmal irritancy data forr four primary irritants. Toxic, in vitro. 521–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell E, Gay R, Swiderek M, et al. Use of fabricated living tissue and organ equivalents as defined higher order systems for the study of pharmacologic responses to test substances. Manuscript presented at the NATO advanced research workshop, Pharmaceutical Application of Cell and Tissue Culture to Drug Transport, 9/4/89–9/9/89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake-Haskins JC, Scala D, Rhein LD, et al. (1986) Predicting surfactant irritation from the swelling response of a collagen film. J Soc Cosmet Chem 37: 199–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom E, Maibach HI, Tammi R (1989) In vitro models for cutaneous effects of glucocorticoids using human skin organ and cell culture. In: Models Dermatology, Vol 4, Maibach HI, Lowe NJ, eds., New York: Karger 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borenfreund E, Puerner JA (1985) Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicol Lett 124: 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borenfreund E, Puerner JA (1984) A simple quantitative procedure using monolayer cultures for cytotoxicity assays. J Tissue Culture Methods 9: 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choman BR(1963) Determination of the response of skin to chemical agents by an in vitro procedure. J Inv Dermatol 44: 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvery HO (1944) Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Division of Pharmacology, Food and Drug Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gfeller W, Kobel W, Seifert G (1985) Overview of animal test methods for skin irritation. Food Chem Toxicol 23: 165–168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson WT, Teall MR (1983) Interactions of C12 surfactants with the skin: Changes in enzymes and visible and histological features of rat skin treated with sodium laurel sulfate. Food Chem Toxicol 21: 587–593.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon VC, Kelly CP, Bergman HC. Evaluation of “Skintex”, an in vitro method for determining dermal irritation. Toxicologist. 1990; 10: 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helman RG, Hall JW, Kao JY (1986) Acute dermal toxicity: In vivo and in vitro comparisons in mice. Fundam Appl Toxicol 7: 94–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imokawa G (1980) Comparative study on the mechanism of irritation by sulfate and phosphate type of anionic surfactants. J Soc Cosmet Chem 31: 45–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanerva L, Lauharanta J (1986) Variable effects of irritants (Methylmethacrylate, Terphenyls, Dithranol, and Methylglyoxalbis-Guanylhydrazone) on the fine structure of the epidermis. Arch Toxicol 9 Suppl: 455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastner D (1977) Irritancy potential of cosmetic ingredients. J Soc Cosmet Chem 28: 741–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luepke NP, Kemper FH (1984) The HET-CAM test: An alternative to the Draize eye test. Food Chem Toxicol 24: 495–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibach HI, Lammintausta K, Berardesca E, Freeman S (1989) Tendency to irritation. Sensitive skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 21: 833–835.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malten KE (1981) Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 7: 238–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagao S, Stroud JD, Hamada T, et al (1972) The effect of sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid on human epidermis: an EM study. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 52: 11–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver GJ, Pemberton MA (1988) An in vitro model for identifying skin- corrosive chemicats. I. Initiat vatidation. Toxicol in Vitro. 2: 7–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parce JW, Owicki JC, Kercso KM, et al. (1989) Detection of cell-affecting agents with silicon biosensor. Science 246: 243–247.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick E, Maibach HI (1989) Comparison of the time course, dose response, and mediators of chemically induced skin irritation in three species. In: Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Frosch PJ, et al, eds., New York: Springer- Verlag, 399–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serban GP, Henry SM, Cotty VF, et al. (1981) In vivo evaluation of skin lotions by electrical capacitance: I. The effect of several lotions on the progression of damage and healing after repeated insult with sodium laurel sulfate. J Soc Cosmet Chem 32: 407–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman J (1983) Preliminary findings on the use of protozoa (Tetrahymena thermophila) as models for ocular irritation testing rabbits. Lab Anim Sci 33: 56–58.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman J, Pennist S (1987) Evaluation of Tetrahymena thermophilia as an in vitro alternative to ocular irritation studies in rabbits. J Toxicol Cut Ocular Toxicol. 6: 33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SOT Position paper, Comments on the LD50 and acute eye and skin irritation tests. Fundam Appl Toxicol 1989; 13: 621–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens TJ, Silber PM, Recce B, et al. (1990) “Testskin”: An in vitro model for detecting cytoxicity and inflammation. Toxicologist 10: 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI (1990) Factors predisposing to cutaneous irritation. Contact Dermatitis 8: 17–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Patil, S., Harvell, J., Maibach, H.I. (1995). In Vitro Skin Irritation Assays: Relevance to Human Skin. In: Galli, C.L., Marinovich, M., Goldberg, A.M. (eds) Modulation of Cellular Responses in Toxicity. NATO ASI Series, vol 93. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79872-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79872-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79874-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79872-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics