Advertisement

Transposition of Phage Mu DNA

  • B. D. Lavoie
  • G. Chaconas
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 204)

Abstract

The temperate bacteriophage Mu has been an extremely useful model system for studies on the mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition. Mu was the first element for which a soluble in vitro transposition system was established (Mizuuchi 1983). Furthermore, some of the features of the Mu system, such as the polarity of strand transfer and the chemical steps of the reaction, appear to be conserved in a wide variety of elements from bacterial transposons through mammalian viruses. The purpose of this review is to summarize the biochemical details of Mu DNA transposition which have been gleaned over recent years. Due to space limitations, an exhaustive review of the literature cannot be performed here and the reader is also referred to several other recent reviews (Pato 1989; Mizuuchi 1992a, b; Haniford and Chaconas 1992).

Keywords

Strand Transfer Integration Host Factor Synaptic Complex Strand Cleavage Integration Host Factor Protein 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adzuma K, Mizuuchi K (1988) Target immunity of Mu transposition reflects a differential distribution of Mu B protein. Cell 53: 257–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adzuma K, Mizuuchi K (1989) Interaction of proteins located at a distance along DNA: mechanism of target immunity in the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction. Cell 57: 41–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adzuma K, Mizuuchi K (1991) Steady-state kinetic analysis of ATP hydrolysis by the B protein of bacteriophage Mu. J Biol Chem 266: 6159–6167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison RG, Chaconas G (1992) Role of the A protein-binding sites in the in vitro transposition of Mu DNA: a complex circuit of interactions involving the Mu ends and the transpositional enhancer. J Biol Chem 267: 19963–19970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Allison RG, Chaconas G (1995) Assignment of Mu end-enhancer partners in an early stage of Mu DNA transposition (submitted)Google Scholar
  6. Baker TA, Luo L (1994) Identification of residues in the Mu transposase essential for catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 6654–6658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker TA, Mizuuchi K (1992) DNA-promoted assembly of the active tetramer of the Mu transposase. Genes Dev 6: 2221–2232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker TA, Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K (1991) MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu. Cell 65: 1003–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker TA, Mizuuchi M, Savilahti H, Mizuuchi K (1993) Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer. Cell 74: 723–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baker TA, Kremenstova E, Luo L (1994) Complete transposition requires four active monomers in the Mu transposase tetramer. Genes Dev 8: 2416–2428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beese L, Steitz TA (1991) Structural basis for the 3–5’ exonuclease activity of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase l=a two metal ion mechanism. EMBO J 10: 25–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Boocock MR, Rowland S-J, Stark WM, Sherratt DJ (1992) Insistent and intransigent: a phage Mu enhancer functions in trans. TIG 8: 151–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaconas G (1987) Transposition of Mu DNA in vivo. In: Symonds N, Toussaint A, van de Putte P, Howe MM (eds) Phage Mu. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp 137–157Google Scholar
  14. Chaconas G, Harshey RM, Sarvetnick N, Bukhari AI (1981) Predominant end-products of prophage Mu DNA transposition during the lytic cycle are replicón fusions. J Mol Biol 150: 341–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaconas G, Gloor G, Miller JL (1985) Amplification and purification of the bacteriophage Mu-encoded B transposition protein. J Biol Chem 260: 2662–2669PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Craig NL, Nash HA (1984) E. coli integration host factor binds to specific site in DNA. Cell 39: 707–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Craigie R, Mizuuchi K (1985) Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: structure of a transposition intermediate. Cell 41: 867–876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Criaigie R, Mizuuchi K (1986) Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments. Cell 45: 793–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Craigie R, Mizuuchi K (1987) Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu. Cell 51: 493–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Craigie R, Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K (1984) Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell 39: 387–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Craigie R, Arndt-Jovin DJ, Mizuuchi K (1985) A defined system for the DNA strand-transfer reaction at the initiation of bacteriophage Mu transposition: protein and DNA substrate requirements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 7570–7574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ding Z-M, Harshey RM, Hurley LH (1993) (+)-CC-1065 as a structural probe of Mu transposase-induced bending of DNA: overcoming limitations of hydroxyl-radical footprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 4281–4287Google Scholar
  23. Drlica K, Rouviere-Yaniv J (1987) Histonelike proteins of bacteria. Microbiol Rev 51: 310–319Google Scholar
  24. Engleman A, Mizuuchi K, Craigie R (1991) HIV—1 DNA integration: mechanism of viral DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer. Cell 67:1211–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freemont PS, Friedman JM, Beese LS, Sanderson MR, Steitz TA (1988) Cocrystal structure of an editing complex of klenow fragment with DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 8924–8928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groenen MAM, van de Putte P (1985) Mapping of a site for packaging of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Virology 144: 520–522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Groenen MAM, van de Putte P (1986) Analysis of the attachment sites of bacteriophage Mu using site- directed mutagenesis. J Mol Biol 189: 597–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Haniford DB, Chaconas G (1992) Mechanistic aspects of DNA transposition. Curr Opin Genes Dev 2: 698–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harel J, Duplessis L, Kahn JS, DuBow MS (1990) The c/s-acting DNA sequences required in vivo for bacteriophage Mu helper-mediated transposition and packaging. Arch Microbiol 154: 67–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harshey RM, Cuneo SD (1986) Carboxyl-terminal mutants of phage Mu transposase. J Genet 65: 159–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haykinson MJ, Johnson RC (1993) DNA looping and the helical repeat in vitro and in vivo: effect of HU protein and enhancer location on Hin invertasome assembly. EMBO J 12: 2503–2512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Heichman KA, Johnson RC (1990) The Hin invertasome: protein-mediated joining of distant recombination sites at the enhancer. Science 249: 511–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Higgins NP, Collier DA, Kilpatrick MW, Krause HM (1989) Supercoiling and integration host factor change the DNA conformation and alter the flow of convergent transcription in phage Mu. J Biol Chem 264: 3035–3042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hodges-Garcia Y, Hagerman PJ, Pettijohn DE (1989) DNA ring closure mediated by protein HU. J Biol Chem 264: 14621–14623PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hwang DS, Kornberg A (1992) Opening of the replication origin of Escherichia coli by DnaA protein with protein HU or IHF. J Biol Chem 15: 23083–23086Google Scholar
  36. Kanaar R, Cozzarelli NR (1992) Roles of Supercoiled DNA structure in DNA transactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2: 369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kulkosky J, Jones KS, Katz RA, Mack JPG, Skalka AM (1992) Residues critical for retroviral integrative recombination in a region that is highly conserved among retroviral/retrotransposon integrases and bacterial insertion sequence transposases. Mol Cell Biol 12: 2331–2338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuo C-F, Zou A, Jayaram M, Getzoff E, Harshey R (1991) DNA-protein complexes during attachment- site synapsis in mu DNA transposition. EMBO J 10: 1585–1591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lavoie BD, Chaconas G (1990) Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of the A, B, and HU protein content of bacteriophage Mu transpososomes. J Biol Chem 265: 1623–1627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lavoie BD, Chaconas G (1993) Site-specific HU binding in the Mu transpososome: conversion of a sequence-independent DNA-binding protein into a chemical nuclease. Genes Dev 7: 2510–2519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lavoie BD, Chaconas G (1994) A second high-affinity HU-binding site in the phage Mu transpososome. J Biol Chem 269: 15571–15576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lavoie BD, Chan BS, Allison RG, Chaconas G (1991) Structural aspects of a higher order nucleoprotein complex: induction of an altered DNA structure at the Mu-host junction of the Mu type 1 transpososome. EMBO J 10:3051–3059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Leung PC, Harshey RM (1991) Two mutations of phage Mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains. J Mol Biol 219: 189–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leung PC, Teplow DB, Harshey RM (1989) Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer. Nature 338: 656–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maxwell A, Craigie R, Mizuuchi K (1987) B protein of bacteriophage Mu is an AT Pase that preferentially stimulates intermolecular DNA strand transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 699–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller JL, Chaconas G (1986) Electron microscopic analysis of in vitro transposition intermediates of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Gene 48: 101–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller JL, Anderson SK, Fujita DJ, Chaconas G, Baldwin DL, Harshey RM (1984) The nucleotide sequence of the B gene of bacteriophage Mu. Nucleic Acids Res 12: 8627–8638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mizuuchi K (1983) In vitro transposition qf bacteriophage Mu: a biochemical approach to a novel replication reaction. Cell 35: 785–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mizuuchi K (1984) Mechanism of transposition of bacteriophage Mu: polarity of the strand-transfer reaction at the initiation of transposition. Cell 39: 395–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mizuuchi K (1992a) Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of Mu and other elements. Annu Rev Biochem 61: 1011–1051PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mizuuchi K (1992b) Polynucleotidyl transfer reactions in transpositional DNA recombination. J Biol Chem 267:21273–21276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Mizuuchi K, Adzuma K (1991) Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism. Cell 66:129–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K (1989) Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell 58: 399–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mizuuchi M, Baker TA, Mizuuchi K (1991) DNase protection analysis of the stable synaptic complexes involved in Mu transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sei USA 88: 9031–9035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mizuuchi M, Baker TA, Mizuuchi K (1992) Assembly of the active form to the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell 70: 303–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nakayama C, Teplow DB, Harshey RM (1987) Structural domains in phage Mu transposase: identification of the site-specific DNA-binding domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 1809–1813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Namgoong S-Y, Jayaram M, Kim K, Harshey RM (1994) DNA-protein cooperativity in the assembly and stabilization of Mu strand transfer complex: relevance of DNA phasing and att site cleavage. J Mol Biol 238: 514–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nash HA (1990) Bending and supercoiling of DNA at the attachment site of bacteriophage lambda. TIBS 15: 222–227PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Nash HA, Robertson CA (1981) Purification and properties of the E coli protein factor required for X integrative recombination. J Biol Chem 256: 9246–9253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Panigrahi GB, Walker IG (1991) Use of monoacetyl-4-hydroxyaminoquinoline 1-oxide to probe contacts between guanines and protein in the minor and major grooves of DNA: interaction of Escherichia coli integration host factor with its recognition site in the early promoter and transposition enhancer of bacteriophage Mu. Biochemistry 30: 9761–9767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pato ML (1989) Bacteriophage Mu. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 23–52Google Scholar
  62. Pettijohn DE (1988) Histone-like proteins and bacterial chromosome structure. J Biol Chem 263: 12793–12796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Robertson CA, Nash HA (1988) Bending of the bacteriophage X attachment site by Escherichia coli integration host factor. J Biol Chem 263: 3554–3557PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Rouviere-Yaniv J, Gros F (1975) Characterization of a novel, low-molecular-weight DNA-binding protein from Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72: 3428–3432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmid MB (1990) More than just “histone-like” proteins. Cell 63: 451–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schneider GJ, Sayre MH, Geiduschek EP (1991) DNA-binding properties of TF1. J Bidl Chem 221:777–794Google Scholar
  67. Serrano M, Salas M, Hermoso JM (1993) Multimeric complexes formed by DNA-binding proteins of low sequence specificity. TIBS 18: 202–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Shore D, Langowski J, Baldwin R (1981) DNA flexibility studied by covalent closure of short fragments into circles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 4833–4837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Suck D (1992) Nuclease structure and catalytic function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2: 84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Suck D, Oefner C (1986) Structure of DNase I at 2.0 Ä resolution suggests a mechanism for binding to and cutting DNA. Nature 321: 620–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Suck D, Lahm A, Oefner C (1988) Structure refined to 2 A of a nicked DNA octanucleotide complex with DNase I. Nature 332: 464–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Surette MG, Chaconas G (1989) A protein factor that reduces the negative supercoiling requirement in the Mu strand-transfer reaction is Escherichia coli integration host factor. J Biol Chem 264: 3028–3034PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Surette MG, Chaconas (1991) Stimulation of the Mu DNA strand cleavage and intramolecular strand- transfer reactions by the Mu B protein is independent of stable binding of the Mu B protein to DNA. J Biol Chem 266: 17306–17313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Surette MG, Chaconas G (1992) The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage. Cell 68:1101–1108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Surette MG, Buch SJ, Chaconas G (1987) Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Cell 49: 253–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Surette MG, Lavoie BD, Chaconas G (1989) Action at a distance in Mu DNA transposition: an enhancerlike element is the site of action of supercoiling relief activity by integration host factor [IHF]. EMBO J 8: 3483–3489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Surette MG, Harkness T, Chaconas G (1991) Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type-1 transpososome formation. J Biol Chem 266: 3118–3124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Tanaka I, Appelt D, Dijk J, White SW, Wilson KS (1984) 3-A resolution structure of a protein with histone-like properties in prokaryotes. Nature 310: 376–381Google Scholar
  79. Teplow DB, Nakayama C, Leung PC, Harshey RM (1988) Structure-function relationships in the transposition protein B of bacteriophage Mu. J Biol Chem 263: 10851–10857PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Thompson JF, Landy A (1988) Empirical estimation of protein-induced DNA binding angles: applications to X site-specific recombination complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 9687–9705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vink C, Yeheskiely E, van der Marel GA, van Boom JH, Plasterk RHA (1991) Site-specific hydrolysis and alcoholysis of human immunodeficiency virus DNA termini mediated by the viral integrase protein. Nucleic Acids Res 19: 6691–6698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vologodskii AV, ievene SD, Klenin KV, Frank-Kamenetskii M, Cozzarelli NR (1992) Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. J Mol Biol 227:1224–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wang Z, Harshey RM (1994) Crucial role for DNA supercoiling in Mu transposition: kinetic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 699–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Weston SA, Lahm A, Suck D (1992) X-ray structure of the DNAse l-d(GGTATACC)2 complex at 2.3 angstrom resolution. J Mol Biol 226: 1237–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. White SW, Appelt K, Wilson KS, Tanaka I (1989) A protein structural motif that bends DNA. Proteins 5: 281–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wu Z, Chaconas G (1992) Flanking host sequences can exert an inhibitory effect on the cleavage step of the in vitro Mu DNA strand transfer reaction. J Biol Chem 267: 9552–9558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Wu Z, Chaconas G (1994) Characterization of a region in phage Mu transposase that is involved in interaction with the Mu B protein. J Biol Chem 269: 28829–28833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Yang C-C, Nash HA (1989) The interaction of E. coli IHF protein with its specific binding sites. Cell 57: 869–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zou A, Leung PC, Harshey RM (1991) Transposase contacts with Mu DNA ends. J Biol Chem 266: 20476–20482PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. D. Lavoie
    • 1
  • G. Chaconas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations