Advertisement

Tn10 and IS10 Transposition and Chromosome Rearrangements: Mechanism and Regulation In Vivo and In Vitro

Chapter
Part of the Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology book series (CT MICROBIOLOGY, volume 204)

Abstract

Tn10 is a composite transposon. It comprises a pair of IS10 insertion sequences located in opposite orientation flanking ~6.7 kb of unique sequences; these unique sequences encode a tetracycline resistance determinant and other determinants whose functions remain to be identified (Fig. 1A; Kleckner 1989). One of Tn10’s two IS10 elements, IS10-Right, is structurally and functionally intact and is considered to be the “wild type” IS10. IS10 encodes a single transposase protein which mediates transposition by interacting with specific sequences at two oppositely oriented IS10 (or Tn10) termini. The termini of IS10 are subtly different and are referred to as the “outside” and “inside” end, respectively, by virtue of their position in Tn10. IS10-Left is structurally intact but encodes a substantially defective transposase.

Keywords

Strand Transfer Synaptic Complex Transposition Reaction IS10 Transposase IS10 Transposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adzuma K, Mizuuchi K (1989) Interaction of proteins located at a distance along DNA: mechanism of target immunity in the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction. Cell 57: 41–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arciszewska LK, Drake D, Craig NL (1989) Transposon Tn7 cis-acting sequences in transposition and transposition immunity. J Mol Biol 207: 35–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur A, Sherratt D (1979) Dissection of the transposition process: a transposon-encoded site-specific recombination system. Mol Gen Genet 175: 267–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur A, Nimmo E, Hettle S, Sherratt D (1984) Transposition and transposition immunity of transposon Tn3 derivatives having different ends. EMBO J 3: 1723–1730PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bainton R, Gamas P, Craig NL (1991) Tn7 transposition in vitro proceeds through an excised transposon intermediate generated by staggered breaks in DNA. Cell 65: 850–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bainton RJ, Kubo KM, Feng JN, Craig NL (1993) Tn7 transposition: target DNA recognition is mediated by multiple Tn7-encoded proteins in a purified in vitro system. Cell 72: 931–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker TA, Luo L (1994) Identification of residues in the Mu transposase essential for catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 6654–6658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker TA, Mizuuchi M, Savilahti H, Mizuuchi K (1993) Division of labor among monomers within the Mu transposase tetramer. Cell 74: 723–733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baker TA, Kremenstova E, Luo L (1994) Complete transposition requires four active monomers in the Mu transposase tetramer. Genes Dev 8: 2416–2428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bender J, Kleckner N (1986) Genetic evidence that Tn10 transposes by a nonreplicative mechanism. Cell 45: 801–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bender J, Kleckner N (1992a) Tn10 insertion specificity is strongly dependent upon sequences immediately adjacent to the target site consensus sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 7996–8000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bender J, Kleckner N (1992b) IS 10 transposase mutations that specifically alter target site recognition. EMBO J 11: 741–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bender J, Kuo J, Kleckner N (1991) Genetic evidence against intramolecular rejoining of the donor DNA molecular following IS10 transposition. Genetics 128: 687–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Benjamin H, Kleckner N (1989) Intramolecular transposition by Tn10. Cell 59: 373–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Benjamin H, Kleckner N (1992) Tn10 transposase excises Tn10 from flanking donor DNA by flush double-strand cleavages at the transposon termini. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 4648–4652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bennett PM, Robinson MK, Richmond MH (1977) R-factors: their properties and possible control. In: Drews J, Högenauer G (eds) Topics in infectious diseases, vol 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, p81Google Scholar
  17. Berg DE (1983) Structural requirements for IS50-mediated gene transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 792–796PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolland S, Kleckner N (1995) The two single strand cleavages at each end of Tn10 occur in a specific order during transposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (in press)Google Scholar
  19. Bushman FD, Craigie R (1992) Integration of human immunodeficiency virus DNA: adduct interference analysis of required DNA sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3458–3462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Casadesus J, Roth JR (1989) Transcriptional occlusion of transposon targets. Mol Gen Genet 216:204–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Case CC, Roels SM, Jensen PD, Lee J, Kleckner N, Simon RW (1989) The unusual stability of the IS10 anti-sense RNA is critical for its function and is determined by the structure of its stem domain. EMBO J 13:4297–4305Google Scholar
  22. Chalmers RM, Kleckner N (1994) Tn10/IS10 transposase purification activation and in vitro reaction. J Biol Chem 269: 8029–8035PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chandler M, Clerger M, Galas DJ (1982) The transposition frequency of IS1-flanked transposons is a function of their size. J Mol Biol 154: 229–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chao L, Vargas C, Spear BB, Cox EC (1983) Transposable elements as mutator genes in evolution. Nature 303: 633–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Craigie R, Mizuuchi K (1986) Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments. Cell 45: 793–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Craigie R, Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K (1984) Site-specific recognition of the bacteriophage Mu ends by the Mu A protein. Cell 39: 387–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Davis MA, Simons RW, Kleckner N (1985) Tn10 protects itself at two levels against fortuitous activation by external promoters. Cell 43: 379–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dong A, Syvanen M (1991) Trans-acting transposase mutant from Tn5. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 6072–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Derbyshire KM, Grindley NDF (1992) Binding of the IS903 transposase to its inverted repeat in vitro. EMBO J 11:3449–3455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Derbyshire KM, Kramer M, Grindley NDF (1990) Role of instability in the cis action of the insertion sequence IS903 transposase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 4048–4052PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Doak TG, Doerder FP, Jahn CL, Herrick G (1994) A proposed superfamily of transposase genes: transposon-like elements in ciliated protozoa and a common “D35E” motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 942–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Engelman A, Mizuuchi K, Craigie R (1991) HIV-1 DNA integration: mechanism of viral DNA cleavage and DNA strand transfer. Cell 67: 1211–1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fayet O, Ramond P, Polard P, Prére MF, Chandler M (1990) Functional similarities between retroviruses and the IS3 family of bacterial insertion sequences? Mol Microbiol 4: 1771–1777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flick K (1991) The relationship between element length and transposition frequency of Tn10 in vivo and in vitro. Honor thesis. Biochemical Sciences, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
  35. Foster T, Davis MA, Takeshita K, Roberts DE, Kleckner N (1981a) Genetic organization of transposon Tn10. Cell 23: 201–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Foster T, Lundblad V, Hanley-Way S, Hailing S, Kleckner N (1981b) Three Tn10-associated excision events: relationship to transposition and role of direct and inverted repeats. Cell 23: 215–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Galas DJ, Chandler M (1989) Bacterial insertion sequences. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 109–162Google Scholar
  38. Grinsted J, Bennett PM, Higginson S, Richmond MH (1978) Regional preference of insertion Tn501 and Tn802 into RP1 and its derivatives. Mol Gen Genet 166: 313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hagemann AT, Craig NL (1993) Tn7 transposition creates a hotspot for homologous recombination at the transposon donor site. Genetics 133: 9–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hallet B, Rezsöhazy R, Mahillon J, Delcour J (1994) IS213A insertion specificity: consensus sequence and DNA bending at the target site. Mol Microbiol 14: 131–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hailing SM, Kleckner N (1982) A symmetrical six-basepair target site sequence determines Tn10 insertion specificity. Cell 28: 155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Haniford D, Kleckner N (1994) Tn10 transposition in vivo: temporal separation of cleavages at the two transposon ends and roles of terminal basepairs subsequent to interaction of ends. EMBO J 13:3401–3411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Haniford DB, Chelouche AR, Kleckner N (1989) A specific class of IS10 transposase mutants are blocked for target site interactions and promote formation of an excised transposon fragment. Cell 59:385–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Haniford DB, Benjamin HW, Kleckner N (1991) Kinetic and structural analysis of a cleaved donor intermediate and strand transfer product in Tn10 transposition. Cell 64: 171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harayama S, Oguchi T, lino T (1984) Does Tn10 transpose via the cointegrate molecule? Mol Gen Genet 194:444–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Harshey RM, Getzoff ED, Baldwin DL, Miller JL, Chaconas G (1985) Primary structure of phage Mu transposase: homology to Mu repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82: 7676–7680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Huisman O, Errada PR, Signon L, Kleckner N (1989) Mutational analysis of ISIO’s outside end. EMBO J 8:2101–2109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jain C, Kleckner N (1993) Preferential cis action of IS10 transposase depends upon its mode of synthesis. Mol Microbiol 9: 249–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jilk RA, Makris JC, Borchardt L, Reznikoff WS (1993) Implications of Tn5-associated adjacent deletions. J Bacteriol 175: 1264–1271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Joyce CM, Steitz TA (1994) Function and structure relationships in DNA polymerases. Annu Rev Biochem 63: 777–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Junop MS, Hockman D, Haniford D (1994) Intragenic suppression of integration-defective IS10 transposase mutants. Genetics 137:343–352PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Kleckner N (1979) DNA sequence analysis of Tn10 insertions: origin and role of 9-bp flanking repetitions during Tn10 translocation. Cell 16: 711–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kleckner N (1989) Transposon Tn10. In: Berg DE, Howe MM (eds) Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, pp 227–268Google Scholar
  54. Kleckner N (1990a) Regulating Tn10 and IS10 transposition. Genetics 124: 449–454PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kleckner N (1990b) Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Biol 6: 297–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kleckner N, Reichardt K, Botstein D (1979a) Inversions and deletions of theSalmonella chromosome generated by the translocatable tetracycline-resistance element Tn10. J Mol Biol 127: 89–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kleckner N, Steele D, Reichardt K, Botstein D (1979b) Specificity of insertion by the translocatable tetracycline-resistance element Tn10. Genetics 92: 1023–1040PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Kwon D, Chalmers RM, Kleckner N (1995) Structural domains of IS10 transposase and reconstitution of transposition activity from proteolytic fragments lacking an inter-domainal linker. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (in press)Google Scholar
  59. Lee S, Butler D, Kleckner N (1987) Efficient Tn10 transposition into a DNA insertion hot spot in vivo requires the 5-methyl groups of symmetrically disposed thymines within the hot-spot consensus sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 7876–7880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Leung PC, Teplow DB, Harshey RM (1989) Interaction of distinct domains in Mu transposase with Mu DNA ends and an internal transpositional enhancer. Nature 338: 656–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lichens-Park A, Syvanen M (1988) Cointegrate formation by IS50 requires multiple donor molecules. Mol Gen Genet 211: 244–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Machida Y, Machida H, Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E (1982) Factors determining frequency of plasmid co-integration mediated by insertion sequence IS1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 277–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mahillion J, Seurinck J, Van Rompuy L, Delcour J, Zabeau M (1985) Nucleotide sequence and structural organization of an insertion sequence element (IS231) from Bacillus thuringiensis strain Berlin 1715. EMBO J 4: 3895–3899Google Scholar
  64. Mizzuchi K (1992a) Transpositional recombination: mechanistic insights from studies of Mu and other elements. Annu Rev Biochem 61: 1011–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mizuuchi K (1992b) Polynucleotidyl transfer reactions in transpositional DNA recombination. J Biol Chem 276: 21273–21276Google Scholar
  66. Mizuuchi K, Adzuma K (1991) Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism. Cell 66: 129–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mizuuchi M, Mizuuchi K (1989) Efficient Mu transposition requires interaction of transposase with a DNA sequence at the Mu operator: implications for regulation. Cell 58: 399–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mizuuchi M, Baker TA, Mizuuchi K (1992) Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition. Cell 70: 303–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Morisato D, Kleckner N (1984) Transposase promotes double strand breaks and single strand joints at Tn10 termini in vivo. Cell 39: 181–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Morisato D, Kleckner N (1987) Tn10 transposition and circle formation in vitro. Cell 51: 101–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Morisato D, Way JC, Kim H-J, Kleckner N (1983) Tn10 transposase acts preferentially on nearby transposon ends in vivo. Cell 32: 799–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Navas J, Garcia-Lobo JM, Leon J, Ortiz JM (1985) Structural and functional analyses of the fosfomycin resistance transposon Tn 2921. J Bacteriol 162: 1061–1067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Raleigh EA, Kleckner N (1984) Multiple IS10 rearrangements in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 173:437–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Reif HJ, Saedler H (1977) Chromosomal rearrangements in the gal region of E. coli K-12 after integration of IS1. In: Bukhari AI, Shapiro JA, Adhya SL (eds) DNA insertion elements, plasmids, and episomes. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp 81–91Google Scholar
  75. Rezsöhazy R, Hallet B, Delcour J, Mahillon J (1993) The IS4 family of insertion sequences: evidence for a conserved transposase motif. Mol Microbiol 9: 1283–1295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roberts D, Kleckner N (1988) Tn10 transposition promotes RecA-dependent induction of a lambda prophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 6037–6041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roberts DE, Hoopes BC, McClure WR, Kleckner N (1985) IS10 transposition is regulated by DNA adenine methylation. Cell 43: 117–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Roberts D, Ascherman D, Kleckner N (1991) IS10 promotes formation of adjacent deletions at low frequency. Genetics 128: 37–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Ross D, Swan J, Kleckner N (1979) Physical structures of Tn10-promoted deletions and inversions: role of 1400 basepair inverted repetitions. Cell 16: 721–731PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sakai J, Chalmers RM, Kleckner N (1995) Identification and characterization of a precleavage synaptic complex that is an early intermediate in Tn10 transposition. EMBO J (in press)Google Scholar
  81. Shapiro JA (1979) Molecular model for the transposition and replication of bacteriophage Mu and other transposable elements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 1933–1937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shen M, Raleigh EA, Kleckner N (1987) Physical analysis of IS10-promoted transpositions and rearrangements. Genetics 116: 359–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Signon L, Kleckner N (1995) Negative and positive regulation of Tn10/IS10-promoted recombination by IHF: two distinguishable processes inhibit transposition off of multicopy plasmid replicons and activate chromosomal events that favor evolution of new transposons. Genes Dev 9: 1123–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Simons RW, Kleckner N (1983) Translational control of IS10 transposition. Cell 34: 683–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simons RW, Hoopes B, McClure W, Kleckner N (1983) Three promoters near the ends of IS10: p-IN p-OUT and p-III. Cell 34: 673–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Starlinger P, Saedler H (1976) IS-elements in microorganisms. In: Compans RW, Cooper M, Koprowski H et al. (eds) Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, Vol. 75. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, p111Google Scholar
  87. Suck D, Lahm A, Oefner C (1988) Structure refined to 2A of a nicked DNA octanucleotide complex with DNase I. Nature 332: 464–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Surette MG, Chaconas G (1992) The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage. Cell 68: 1101–1108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Surette MG, Buch SJ, Chaconas G (1987) Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA. Cell 49: 253–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Surette MG, Harkness T, Chaconas G (1991) Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. J Biol Chem 266: 3118–3124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Thaler DS, Stahl MM, Stahl FW (1987) Tests of the double-strand-break repair model for Red-mediated recombination of phage λ and plasmid λdv. Genetics 116: 501–511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Waugh DS, Sauer RT (1993) Single amino acid substitutions uncouple the DNA binding and strand scission activities of Fokl endonuclease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 9596–9600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Way J, Kleckner N (1985) Transposition of plasmid-borne Tn10 elements does not exhibit simple length dependence. Genetics 111: 705–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Weinert TA, Derbyshire K, Hughson FM, Grindley NDF (1984) Replicative and conservative transpositional recombination of insertion sequences. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 49: 251–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Weigand TW, Reznikoff WS (1992) Characterization of two hypertransposing Tn5 mutants. J Bacteriol 174: 1229–1239Google Scholar
  96. Weinreich MD, Gasch A, Reznikoff WS (1994) Evidence that the cis preference of the Tn5 transposase is caused by nonproductive multimerization. Genes Dev 8: 2363–2374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations