A Study on the Accuracy of Finite Volume and and Boundary Element Methods in Laminar Separated Flows

  • D. Drikakis
  • R. Škerget
Conference paper


The development of accurate and efficient numerical methods for simulating incompressible flows is a challenging area of computational fluid dynamics because of its importance in a wide range of physical and industrial applications. Most of the numerical methhods used for simulating incompressible flows are finite volume and finite difference methods. Although very good predictions have been achieved by using these methods, there are still several laminar flow problems where very fine grids have to be used for predicting the correct flow structure. Such flow problems concern nonlinear phenomena, separated flows and instabilities. The very rapid advances in the computing power provide the possibility to study complex flow problems using very fine grids, but it is not still enough for studying with high accuracy unsteady, separated three-dimensional flows. Therefore the development and investigation of new numerical methods still remains a basic research direction in computational fluid dynamics.


Computational Fluid Dynamic Boundary Element Boundary Element Method Finite Volume Method Incompressible Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chorin, A., J. A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Viscous Flow Problems, J. of Computational Physics, 2 (1967), pp. 12–26.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drikakis, D., Govatsos, P., & Papantonis, D., A characteristic based method for incompressible flows, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, Vol. 19 (1994), pp. 667–685.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drikakis, D., Durst, F. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional incompressible flows by using high order schemes, in print: Proceedings of the second summer Conference on Numerical Modelling in Continuum Mechanics: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications, 1994, Prague, August 22–25.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alujevic A., Kuhn G.,Skerget L., Boundary Elements for the Solution of Navier-Stokes Equations, Comp.Meth.Appl.Mech.Eng., Vol. 91 (1991), pp. 1187–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rek, Z., Skerget, L., Boundary Element Method for Steady 2D High-Reynolds Number Flow, Int.J. Num.Meth.Fluids, Vol. 19 (1994), pp. 343–361.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skerget, L., Alujevic, A., Brebbia, C.A., & Kuhn, G., Natural and forced convection simulation using the velocity-vorticity approach. Topics in Boundary Element Research, Vol.5 (1989), pp.49–86, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Armaly, B. F., Durst, F., Pereira, J. C. F., Schönung, Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow, J. of Fluid Mech., Vol. 127 (1983), pp. 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Drikakis
    • 1
  • R. Škerget
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.University of MariborMariborSlovenia

Personalised recommendations