Advertisement

Factors Affecting the Early Stages of Corrosion-Fatigue in Commercial Aircraft Skin

  • Charles G. Schmidt
  • Christine H. Kanazawa
  • Donald A. Shockey
  • Thomas H. Flournoy
Conference paper

Abstract

Corrosion-fatigue tests were performed on tapered laboratory specimens of skin material obtained from a retired commercial aircraft. The early stages of corrosion-fatigue damage were examined in the as-received condition (with paint and clad intact), in the absence of paint, and without paint or cladding. Cracks were found to nucleate preferentially in the clad layer near prismatic pit colonies. The crack nucleation rate was affected by pH and the exposed clad/core area ratio. The growth rate of small cracks was not influenced by pH or exposed clad/core area ratio.

Keywords

Fatigue Crack Crack Growth Rate Corrosion Fatigue Crevice Corrosion Clothe Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. C. Newman, Jr., and I. S. Raju, “Stress Intensity Factor Equations for Cracks in Three-Dimensional Finite Bodies,” NASA Tech. Memo. 83200 (1981), pp. 1 – 49, as quoted in Stress Intensity Factors Handbook, Vol. 2, Y. Murakami, Ed., Pergamon, New York (1990).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    H. Kaesche, “Pitting Corrosion of Aluminum and Intergranular Corrosion of Aluminum Alloys,” in Localized Corrosion, NACE-3, R. W. Staehle, B. F. Brown, J. Kruger, and A. Agarwal, Eds., National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX (1974), pp. 516–525.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. Chaudhuri, Y. M. Tan, V. Gondhalekar, and K. M. Patni, “Comparison of Corrosion-Fatigue Properties of Presorroded 6013 Bare and 2024 Bare Aluminum Alloy Sheet Materials,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., Vol. 3 (1994), pp. 371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Chaudhuri, Y. M. Tan, K. M. Patni, and A. Eftekhari, “Comparison of Corrosion-Fatigue Properties of 6013 Bare, Alclad 2024, and 2024 Bare Aluminum Alloy Sheet Materials,” J. Mater. Engr. Perform., Vol. 1 (1992), pp. 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. S. Chen, M. Gao, D. G. Harlow, and R. P. Wei, “Corrosion and Corrosion Fatigue of Airframe Aluminum Alloys,” FAA/NASA International Symposium of Advanced Structural Integrity Methods for Airframe Durability and Damage Tolerance, C. E. Harris, Ed., NASA Conference Publication 3274, Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA (1994), pp. 157–173.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Pourbaix, “Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions,” National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX (1974), pp. 168–176.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Alkire, T. Tomasson, and K. Hebert, “The Critical Geometry for Initiation of Crevice Corrosion,” J. Electrochemical Soc., Vol. 132 (1985), pp. 1027–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. S. Piascik and S. A. Willard, “The Growth of Small Corrosion Fatigue Cracks in Alloy 2024,” NASA Tech. Memo. 107755 (1993).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    N.J.H. Holroyd, “Environment-Induced Cracking of High-Strength Aluminum Alloys,” in Environmentally Induced Cracking of Metals, NACE-10, R. P. Gangloff and M. B. Ives, Eds., National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX (1990), pp. 311–345.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles G. Schmidt
    • 1
  • Christine H. Kanazawa
    • 1
  • Donald A. Shockey
    • 1
  • Thomas H. Flournoy
    • 2
  1. 1.SRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA
  2. 2.FAA Technical CenterAtlantic CityUSA

Personalised recommendations