Dynamic Fracture Analysis Based on a Continuum Damage Model

  • E. P. Chen
Conference paper

Abstract

Because of its potential utilization in energy exploration and defense applications, the phenomenon of brittle fracture in solids under dynamic loads has been an ongoing topic of interest. A continuum damage model [1] was developed to simulate rock fragmentation induced by explosive blasts for in situ oil shale retorting. The model was based on the premise that the inelastic brittle response exhibited by rock under dynamic loads is due principally to the stress-induced sub-scale cracks. Locally, the growth and interaction of these sub-scale cracks relieve portions of the material volume and reduce its capability to carry load. Globally, this effect is reflected in the degradation of the material stiffness. In this manner, the dynamic fracture process was modeled as a continuous accrual of damage, where damage is considered to be the degree of reduction of the material stiffness. Reasonable correlations between calculated and measured data were obtained by this model [1–3].

Keywords

Brittle Shale Explosive Perforation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    L. M. Taylor, E. P. Chen and J. S. Kuszmaul, Microcrack-induced damage accumulation in brittle rock under dynamic loading, Journal of Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 55 (1986), pp. 301–320.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    B. J. Thorne, A damage model for rock fragmentation and comparison of calculations with blasting experiments in granite, SAND90–1389, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. P. Chen, Continuum Damage Mechanics Studies on the Dynamic Fracture of Concrete, in Cement-Based Composites: Strain Rate Effects on Fracture, S. Mindess and S. P. Shah, Editors, Materials Research Society Symposia Proceedings Vol. 64 (1986), Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, pp.63–77.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    B. Budiansky and R. J. O’Connell, Elastic moduli of a cracked solid, International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 12 (1976), pp. 81–97.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. C. Drucker and W. Prager, Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 10 (1952), pp. 157–165.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Englman and Z. Jaeger, Theoretical aids for the improvement of blasting efficiencies in oil shale and rocks, AP-TR-12/87, Soreq Nuclear Research Center, Yavne, Israel (1987).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA2D, an explicit two-dimensional hydrodynamic finite element code, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, California (1990).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. J. Hanchak, M. J. Forrestal, E. R. Young and J. Q. Ehrgott, Perforation of concrete slabs with 48 MPa and 140 MPa unconfined compressive strengths, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 12 (1992), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    D. E. Grady and M. E. Kipp, Continuum modeling of explosive fracture in oil shale, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, Vol. 17 (1980), pp. 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. E. Grady, The mechanics of fracture under high-rate stress loading, Preprints of the William Prager Symposium on Mechanics of Geomaterials: Rocks, Concrete and soils, Z. P. Bazant, Editor, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois (1980), pp. 149–188.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. P. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Sandia National LaboratoriesAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations