Extension of the Flow Rule in Plastic Constitutive Equation

  • K. Hashiguchi
Conference paper


The extension of the elastoplastic constitutive equation so as to describe the dependencies of the direction of a plastic stretching on a stress rate or on a stretching and of the magnitude on a stress rate component tangential to the yield surface has been one of the most pressing problems in the elastoplasticity. To this aim, various models have been proposed in the past. However, a pertinent model applicable to a general loading process has not previously been proposed. In this article, keeping a single smooth (regular) yield surface for the steady development of elastoplasticity, an extended flow rule describing the above-mentioned dependencies is proposed by incorporating an additional term of the stretching tensor in degree zero into the associated flow rule. The elastoplastic constitutive equation with this flow rule is thought to be a pertinent one which fulfills the mechanical requirements, i.e. the rate-nonlinearity, the continuity condition and the work rate-stiffness relaxation [1,2] and which is applicable to an arbitrary loading process including unloading, reloading and reverse loading.


Yield Surface Work Rate Stress Rate Flow Rule Plastic Relaxation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    K. Hashiguchi, Fundamental Requirements and Formulation of Elastoplastic Constitutive Equations with Tangential Plasticity, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol.9 (1993), pp.525–549.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Hashiguchi, Mechanical Requirements and Structures of Cyclic Plasticity Models, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol.9 (1993), pp.721–748.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Hashiguchi, Inexpedience of the Non-associated Flow Rule, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., Vol.15 (1991), pp.752–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Runesson and Z. Mroz, A Note on Nonassociated Plastic Flow Rules, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol.5 (1989), pp. 639–658.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    A.A. Ilyushin, On the Postulate of Plasticity, Appl. Math. Mech., Vol.25 (1961), pp.746–752. (Translation of O Postulate Plastichnosti, Prikladnaya Mathematika i Mekhanika, Vol.25 (1961), pp.503–507.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.C. Drucker, A More Fundamental Approach to Plastic Stress-Strain Relations, Proc. 1st U.S. National Congr. Appl. Mech. (ASME), Vol.1 (1951), pp.487–491.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Hill, A General Theory of Uniqueness and Stability in Elastic-Plastic Solids, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, Vol.6 (1958), pp.236–249.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Hashiguchi, On the Loading Criterion, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol.10 (1994), pp.871–878.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    K. Hashiguchi, Constitutive Equations of Elastoplastic Materials with Elastic-Plastic Transition, J. Appl. Mech. (ASME), Vol.47 (1980), pp.266–272.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    K. Hashiguchi, Subloading Surface Model in Unconventional Plasticity, Int. J. Solids Structures, Vol.25 (1989), pp.917–945.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Hashiguchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations