Skip to main content

The Biology of Behavior — Criteria for Success in Animals and Robots

  • Conference paper
The Biology and Technology of Intelligent Autonomous Agents

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 144))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to discuss “doing the right thing”. The question is what is the right thing? In animal behaviour studies there is a consensus on this question, and I will start by outlining this. In animal behaviour studies there is no consensus as to how optimal behaviour is achieved, and I will outline some of the problems. In robotics there is no consensus about doing the right thing and I will ask what can be learned from animal behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, R.E. and McFarland, D.J. (1979) Interaction of hunger and sexual motivation in the male rat: a time-sharing approach. Animal behaviour, 27, 887–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. and McFarland, D..T. (1979) Time-sharing as a mechanism for the control of behaviour sequences during the courtship of the three-spined stickleback ( Gasterosteus Aculeatus ). Animal behaviour, 27, 270–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. (1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press: Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland, R., Morris, D. and Tinbergen, N. (1957) The spines of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus and Pygosteus) as means of defence against predators ( Perca and Essox ). Behaviour, 10, 205–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, A. and McNamara, J.M. (1988) A framework for the functional analysis of behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11,117–154 Hutchinson, G.E. ( 1957 ) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on

    Google Scholar 

  • Quantitative Biology 22: 415–427 McFarland, D.J. (1969a) Mechanisms of behavioural disinhibition. Animal Behaviour, 17: 238–242

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D.J. (1970b) Adjunctive behaviour in feeding and drinking situations. Revue comportement animal 4: 64–73

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D.J. (1974) Time-sharing as a behavioral phenomenon. In Advances in The Study of Behavior, (eds.) D.S. Lehrman, J.S. Rosenblatt, R.A. Hinde and E. Shaw. Academic Press, N.Y

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, DJ. (1977) Decision-making in animals. Nature, 269: 15–21 McFarland, DJ. (1985) Animal behaviour. Pitman Books, London McFarland, DJ. ( 1989 ) Problems of animal behaviour. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, DJ. (1991) What it means for robot behaviour to be adaptive. From animals to animats. (eds.) J. Meyer and S. W. Wilson. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, DJ. (1992b) Animals as cost-based robots. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 6, 133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D.J. (1993) Animal behaviour, (second edition). Longman, London McFarland, D J. (1995) Autonomy and self-sufficiency in robots. In: Steels, L. and R. Brooks (1995) The Artificial Life Route to AI. Building Situated Autonomous Agents. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Haven, pp. 197–225

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D.J. and L’Angellier, A.B. (1966) Disinhibition of drinking during satiation of feeding behaviour in the Barbary dove. Animal Behaviour, 14, 463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D.J. and Boesser, T. (1993) Intelligent behavior in animals and robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D.J. and Houston, A. (1981) Quantitative ethology The state space approach. Pitman Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D.J. and Sibly, R.M. (1975) The behavioural final common path.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 270: 265–293xz

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibly, R.M. and McCleery, R.H. (1985) Optimal decision rules for gulls. Animal Behaviour, 33, 449–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibly, R.M. and McFarland, D.J. (1976) On the fitness of behaviour sequences. American naturalist, 110: 601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D.W. and Krebs, J.R. (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1953) The herring gull’s world. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

McFarland, D. (1995). The Biology of Behavior — Criteria for Success in Animals and Robots. In: Steels, L. (eds) The Biology and Technology of Intelligent Autonomous Agents. NATO ASI Series, vol 144. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79629-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79629-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79631-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79629-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics