Skip to main content

Should Neuromuscular Transmission Be Monitored Routinely During Anaesthesia?

  • Conference paper
Control and Automation in Anaesthesia
  • 72 Accesses

Abstract

Traditionally, anaesthetists evaluate the effect of neuromuscular blocking agents clinically: we observe the fasciculations following injection of succinylcholine, the movements of the reservoir bag, the spontaneous movements of the patient, head lift, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Viby-Mogensen J (1981) Succinylcholine neuromuscular blockade in subjects homozygous for atypical plasma cholinesterase. Anesthesiology 55: 429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Østergaard D, Jensen FS, Jensen E et al (1993) Mivacurium-induced neuromuscular blockade in patients with atypical plasma cholinesterase. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 37: 314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Viby-Mogensen J, Howardy-Hansen P, Chraemmer-Jørgensen B et al (1981) Posttetanic count (PTC): a new method of evaluating an intense non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology 55: 458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernando PUE, Viby-Mogensen J, Bonsu AK et al (1987) Relationship between post-tetanic count and response to carinal stimulation during vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 31: 593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen FS, Viby-Mogensen J (1995) Plasma cholinesterase and abnormal reaction to succinylcholine: twenty years’ experience with the Danish Cholinesterase Research Unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 39: 150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Viby-Mogensen J, Jensen NH, Engbaek J et al (1985) Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four stimulation. Anesthesiology 63: 440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Engbaek J, Østergaard D, Viby-Mogensen J (1989) Double-burst stimulation (DBS): a new pattern of nerve stimulation to identify residual neuromuscular block. Br J Anaesth 62: 274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Drenck NE, Ueda N, Olsen NV et al (1989) Manual evaluation using double-burst stimulation: a comparison with train-of-four. Anesthesiology 70: 578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Viby-Mogensen J, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B, Ørding H (1979) Residual curarization in the recovery room. Anesthesiology 50: 539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lennmarken C, Lofstrom B (1984) Partial curarization in the postoperative period. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 28: 260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beemer GH, Rozental P et al (1986) Postoperative neuromuscular function. Anesth Intensive Care 14: 41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bevan DR, Smith CE, Donati F (1988) Postoperative neuromuscular blockade: a comparison between atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Anesthesiology 69: 272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen E, Viby-Mogensen J, Bang U (1988) The accelograph: a new neuromuscular transmission analyzer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 32: 49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mortensen CR, Berg H, El-Mahdy A, Viby-Mogensen J (1995) Perioperative monitoring of neuromuscular function using acceleromyography prevents residual block following pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Viby-Mogensen J (1994) Neuromuscular monitoring. In: Miller RD (ed) Anesthesia, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Viby-Mogensen, J. (1995). Should Neuromuscular Transmission Be Monitored Routinely During Anaesthesia?. In: Schwilden, H., Stoeckel, H. (eds) Control and Automation in Anaesthesia. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79573-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79573-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79575-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79573-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics