Skip to main content

A perfectness concept for multicriteria games

  • Conference paper
Operations Research Proceedings 1994

Part of the book series: Operations Research Proceedings ((ORP,volume 1994))

  • 172 Accesses

Summary

Multicriteria games or games with vector payoffs are used to model multi-person decision situations in which some decision makers take multiple objectives into account. Although the one-person decision theoretic literature on multiobjective programming is rather well developed (Cohon (1978), Chankong and Haimes (1983), French et al. (1983)), the game theoretic counterpart has attracted relatively little attention. Shapley (1959) was the first to consider Pareto equilibria for games with vector payoffs and this concept is elaborated in Ghose, Prasad (1988) and Borm, Tijs and van den Aarssen (1988). Wang (1991) provides a general existence theorem for Pareto equilibria. In this paper we introduce a refinement of Pareto equilibria based on the perfectness concept of Selten (1975). Existence of perfect Pareto equilibria is shown (Th.3) and alternative characterizations in the spirit of van Damme (1991) for perfect Nash equilibria are provided (Th.4). These results are driven by a characterization of Pareto equilibria in terms of carriers and efficient best reply sets (Th.1 & Th.2).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borm, P.E.M., Tijs, S.H. and van den Aarssen, J. (1988), Pareto equilibria in multiobjective games, Methods of Operations Research, 6, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chankong, V. and Haimes, Y. (1983), Multiobjective decision making, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohon, J.L. (1978), Multiobjective programming and planning, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme, E.E.C. (1987), Stability and perfection of Nash equilibria, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, S., Hartley, R.,Thomas, L.C. and White, D.J. (editors) (1983), Multi-objective decision making, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose, D. and Prasad, U.R. (1989), Solution concepts in two-person multicriteria games, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 59, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1975), Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games, International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S. (1959), Equilibrium points in games with vector payoffs, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 6, 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (1991), An existence theorem of a Pareto equilibrium, Applied Mathematical Letters, 3, 61–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van Megen, F., Borm, P., Tijs, S. (1995). A perfectness concept for multicriteria games. In: Derigs, U., Bachem, A., Drexl, A. (eds) Operations Research Proceedings 1994. Operations Research Proceedings, vol 1994. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79459-9_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79459-9_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58793-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79459-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics