Advertisement

Restricted arterial expansion as a universal causative factor in communicating hydrocephalus

  • D. Greitz
  • J. Hannerz
  • B. M. Bellander
  • T. Hindmarsh
Conference paper

Abstract

The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow in the aqueduct and below the foramen magnum and the blood flow in the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) were examined in ten patients with communicating hydrocephalus and six controls, using cardiac-gated MR-phase images. The cervical CSF pulsations were found to be significantly decreased in communicating hydrocephalus reflecting a decreased expansion of the intracranial arteries, in accordance with a previous study. The stroke volume and the rise and delay times for the systolic peak in the SSS were also decreased, as was the pulsatility index for diastole. The reduced expansion of the arteries is regarded as the main causative factor in communicating hydrocephalus. According to the theory, any process that restricts this expansion, such as arterial disease and obstruction of the paravascular spaces, may cause communicating hydrocephalus. It is suggested that the same mechanism explains hydrocephalus accompanying obstruction of the subarachnoid space near the craniocervical junction as seen with cervical spinal stenosis and Chiari malformations.

Key words

Hydrocephalus Arterial expansion Cerebrospinal fluid, flow dynamics Superior sagittal sinus, flow dynamics Magnetic resonance imaging 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Greitz D, Wirestam R, Franck A, Nordell B, Thomsen C, Ståhlberg F (1992) Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology 34:370–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Greitz D, Hannerz J, Rähn T, Bolander H, Ericsson A (1994) MR imaging of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in health and disease. On the vascular pathogenesis of communicating hydrocephalus and benign intracranial hypertension. Acta Radiol 35:204–211.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gosling R, King D (1974) Arterial assessment of Doppler shift ultrasound. Proc R Soc Med 67:447–449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Rocco et al. (1978) Communicating hydrocephalus induced by mechanically increased amplitude of the intraventricular CSF pressure. Experimental studies. Exp Neurol 59:40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ekstedt J, Friden H (1984) CSF hydrodynamics of the study of adult hydrocephalus syndrome. In: Shapiro K, Marmarou A, Portnoy H (eds) Hydrocephalus. Raven Press, New York, pp 363–382.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pedley TJ (1980) Flow in collapsible tubes. In Batchelor GK, Miles JW (eds) The fluid mechanics of large blood vessels. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Greitz
    • 1
  • J. Hannerz
    • 2
  • B. M. Bellander
    • 3
  • T. Hindmarsh
    • 1
  1. 1.The Karolinska MR-Research CentreKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations