Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Holograph versus maximum-intensity projection display of neurovascular anatomy and pathology

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the XV Symposium Neuroradiologicum

  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

We compared the commonly used maximum-intensity projection (MIP) algorithm for extracting information for three-dimensional (3D) rendering with a holographic technique for true 3D volume display. The holographic technique uses all the data generated by magnetic resonance angiography, whereas MIP selects only certain data to create a rendering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brown DG, Riederer SJ (1992) Contrast-to-noise ratios in maximum intensity projection images. Magn Reson Med 23: 130–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, Lee RE (1990) Artifacts in maximum-intensity-projection display of MR angiograms. AJR 154: 623–629.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blatter DD, Parker DL, Robinson RO (1991) Cerebral MR angiography with multiple overlapping thin slab acquisition, part 1. Quantitative analysis of vessel visibility. Radiology 179: 805–810.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Voxel, CA, 92653, USA

    J. Hunter, C. Ogilvy, R. Schulz, G. Geil, L. Lustrin, A. Wolfe & J. Taveras

Authors
  1. J. Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Ogilvy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Geil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L. Lustrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Wolfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J. Taveras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860, Japan

    Mutsumasa Takahashi (Chairmann) & Yukunori Korogi (Assistant Professor) (Chairmann) &  (Assistant Professor)

  2. Lysholm Department of Radiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK

    Ivan Moseley (Director) (Director)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hunter, J. et al. (1995). Holograph versus maximum-intensity projection display of neurovascular anatomy and pathology. In: Takahashi, M., Korogi, Y., Moseley, I. (eds) Proceedings of the XV Symposium Neuroradiologicum. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79434-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79434-6_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79436-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79434-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation