Advertisement

MR angiography of arteriovenous malformations: usefulness of phase-contrast with different velocity encoding

  • M. Sumida
  • T. Uozumi
  • F. Ikawa
  • O. Yukawa
  • K. Migita
Conference paper

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of MR angiography in arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and compare the phase-contrast (PC) with different velocity encoding (VENC) and time-of-flight (TOF) techniques, we prospectively studied 27 patients. In 3, PC was performed before and after embolisation and in 5 before and after radiosurgery. VENC was adjusted to 60 cm/s and 10 or 20 cm/s. PC with VENC 60 cm/s demonstrated main feeders in all cases but could not demonstrate smaller feeders. PC with VENC 10 cm/s demonstrated the nidus, draining veins and varices in all cases. After embolisation and radiosurgery, PC with VENC 10 cm/s clearly demonstrated the reduction or obliteration of the nidus and varix. PC is superior to TOF in demonstrating AVMs and is useful for preoperative diagnosis and follow-up, especially after embolisation and radiosurgery.

Key words

Arteriovenous malformation Magnetic resonance angiography Phase contrast 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dumoulin CL, Cline HE, Souza SP, et al (1989) Threedimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spin saturation. Magn Reson Med 11: 35–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wehrli FW, Shirakawa A, Gullberg GT, et al (1986) Time-of-flight MR flow imaging: selective saturation recovery with gradient refocusing. Radiology 160: 781–785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumoulin CL, Hart HR (1986) Magnetic resonance angiography. Radiology 161: 717–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Walker MF, et al (1989) Three-dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 9: 139–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marchai G, Bosnans H, Van Fraeyenhoven L, et al (1990) Intracranial vascular lesions: optimization and clinical evaluation of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 175: 443–448.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edelman RR, Wentz KU, Mattle HP, et al (1989) Intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation with selective MR angiography and venography. Radiology 173: 831–837.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pernicone JR, Siebert JE, Potchen EJ, et al (1990) Three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography in the head and neck: preliminary report. AJNR 11: 457–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nussel F, Wegmuller H, Huber P (1991) Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, magnetic resonance imaging and conventional angiography in cerebral arteriovenous malformation. Neuroradiology 33: 56–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Sumida
    • 1
  • T. Uozumi
    • 1
  • F. Ikawa
    • 1
  • O. Yukawa
    • 1
  • K. Migita
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryHiroshima University of MedicineMinami-ku, Hiroshima, 734Japan

Personalised recommendations