Skip to main content

Abstract

Attention to innovations in cancer treatment has tended to eclipse the importance of prognostic assessment. However, the recognition that prognostic factors often have a greater impact on outcome than available therapies and the proliferation of biochemical, molecular, and genetic markers have resulted in renewed interest in this field. The outcome in patients with cancer is determined by a combination of numerous factors. Presently, the most widely recognized are the extent of disease, histologic type of tumor, and treatment. It has been known for some time that additional factors also influence outcome. These include histologic grade, lymphatic or vascular invasion, mitotic index, performance status, symptoms, and most recently genetic and biochemical markers. It is the aim of this volume to compile those prognostic factors that have emerged as important determinants of outcome for tumors at various sites. This compilation represents the first phase of a more extensive process to integrate all prognostic factors in cancer to further enhance the prediction of outcome following treatment. Certain issues surrounding the assessment and reporting of prognostic factors are also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD (1983) Analysis of survival by tumour response. J Clin Oncol 1: 710–719

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Armitage P (1973) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell, Oxford,

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barton MB, Keane TJ, Gadalla T et al (1992) The effect of treatment time and treatment interruption on tumour control following radical radiotherapy of laryngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 23: 137–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baxt W (1991) Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 115: 843–848

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd NF (1992) Guide to studies of diagnostic tests, prognosis, and treatment. In: Tannock IF, Hill R (eds)The basic science of oncology. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 379–394

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burke HB, Henson DE (1993) Criteria for prognostic factors and for an enhanced prognostic system. Cancer 72: 3131–3135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Byar DP (1984) Identification of prognostic factors. In: Buyse ME, Staquet MJ, Sylvester RJ (eds) Cancer clinical trials. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 423–443

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Stat Soc B 34: 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellenberg SS, Hamilton JM (1989) Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: cancer. Stat Med 8: 405–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellenberg SS (1991) Surrogate end points in clinical trials. Br Med J 302: 63–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feinstein AR (1985) On classifying cancers while treating patients. Arch Intern Med 145: 1789–1791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Feinstein AR, Gelfman NA, Yesner R (1970) Observer variability in histopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer. Am Rev Respir Dis 101: 671–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK (1985) The Will Rogers phenomenon. Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 312: 1604–1608

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feinstein AR, Wells CK (1990) A clinical severity staging system for patients with lung cancer. Medicine 69: 1–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fielding LP (1988) Surgeon-related variability in the outcome of cancer surgery. J Clin Gastroenterol 10: 120–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Dudley HA (1978) Surgeon-related variables and the clinical trial. Lancet ii: 778–779

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fielding LP, Arsenault PA, Chapuis PH et al (1991) Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: An international documentation system (IDS) and an international comprehensive anatomical terminology ( ICAT ). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 6: 325–344

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fielding LP, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Freedman LS (1992) The future of prognostic factors in outcome prediction for patients with cancer. Cancer 70: 2367–2377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fielding LP, Henson DE (1993) Multiple prognostic factors and outcome analysis in patients with cancer. Communication from the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 71: 2426–2429

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fyles A, Keane TJ, Barton M et al (1992) The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer. Radiother Oncol 25: 273–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. George SL (1988) Identification and assessment of prognostic factors. Semin Oncol 5: 462–471

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gloeckler LA, Henson DE, Harras A (1994) Survival from breast cancer according to tumour size and nodal status. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 3: 35–53

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Matchar DB et al (1985) Regression models for prognostic predictions: advantages, problems and suggested solution. Cancer Treat Rep 69: 1071–1077

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Henson DE (1992) Future directions for the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Cancer 69: 1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hermanek P (1993) Long-term results of a German prospective multicenter study on colo-rectal cancer. In: Takahashi T (ed) Recent advances in management of digestive cancers. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hermanek P, Sobin LH (eds) (1992) UICC TNM classification of malignant tumours, 4th edn, 2nd rev. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hermanek P, Hutter RVP, Sobin LH (1990) Prognostic grouping: the next step in tumour classification. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 116: 513–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hermanek P, Wittekind C (1994) Residual tumor ( R) classification and prognosis. Semin Surg Oncol 10: 12–20

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hermanek P Jr, Wiebelt H, Riedl S, Staimmer D, Hermanek P und die Studiengruppe Kolorektales Karzinom (SGKRK) (1994) Langzeitergebnisse der chirurgischen Therapie des Coloncarcinoms. Ergebnisse der Studiengruppe Kolorektales Karzinom. Chirurg 65: 287–297

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL (1980) The statistical analysis of failures time data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sather HN (1986) The use of prognostic factors in clinical trials. Cancer 58: 461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Simon R (1984) Importance of prognostic factors in cancer clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 68: 185–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Simon R, Altman DG (1994) Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncology. Br J Cancer 69: 979–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Soong S-J (1992) A computerized mathematical model and scoring system for predicting outcome in patients with localized melanoma. In: Balch CM, Houghton AN, Milton GW Et Al (eds) Cutaneous melanoma. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 200–212

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stanley KE (1980) Prognostic factors for survival in patients with inoperable lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 65: 25–32

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Suciu S, Sylvester RJ, Yamanaka H (1990) Time-dependent prognostic factors in advanced prostatic cancer. In: Newling DWW, Jones WG, (eds) Prostate cancer and testicular cancer. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 203–215 (EORTC Genitourinary Group monograph 7 )

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zagars GK (1993) The prognostic significance of a single serum prostate-specific antigen value beyond six months after radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27: 39–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 International Union Against Cancer, Geneva

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gospodarowicz, M.K., Hermanek, P., Henson, D.E. (1995). Introduction. In: Hermanek, P., Gospodarowicz, M.K., Henson, D.E., Hutter, R.V.P., Sobin, L.H. (eds) Prognostic Factors in Cancer. UICC International Union Against Cancer / Union Internationale Contre le Cancer. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79395-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79395-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58688-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79395-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics