Convergent Research Methods in Music Cognition

  • Edward C. Carterette
  • Roger A. Kendall
Conference paper

Abstract

An often overlooked principle of perceptual research is that what we learn is dependent upon what we ask and how we ask it. Experimentation in cognitive music research is driven implicitly and explicitly by assumptions, models, and theoretical constructs both of cognitive psychology and music. Most research in music perception and cognition is implemented by a single method. Recently, questions have been raised about the validity and generality of such a limited approach, particularly regarding such complicated theoretical constructs as musical tonality. We propose that a useful technique is to converge on the answer to experimental questions by applying multiple methods, in essence to investigate simultaneously the central research question as well as ancillary questions of method. We suggest that psychomusical research mandates the use of multiple, convergent methods and the invention or derivation of new approaches. This principle of convergence is illustrated by examples from research on tonality, musical communication and timbre.

Keywords

Brittle Vale Undercut Carol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beurmann A, Schneider A (1989) Probleme und Aufgaben akustischtonometrischer Forschung in der Vergleichenden Musikwissenschaft. Acustica 69: 156–162Google Scholar
  2. Bismarck G von (1974a) Timbre of steady sounds: a factorial investigation of its verbal attributes. Acustica 30:146–159Google Scholar
  3. Bismarck G von (1974a) Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady Sounds. Acustica 30:159–192Google Scholar
  4. Butler D (1989) Mapping the listener’s recognition of tonality: a delineation of the theory of intervallic rivalry. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Japanese Society of Music Perception and Cognition, Kyoto pp 425–430Google Scholar
  5. Butler D (1990) Response to Carol Krumhansl. Music Percep 7(3):325Google Scholar
  6. Carterette EC, Kohl DV, Pitt MA (1986) Similarities among transformed melodies: the abstraction of invariants. Music Percept 3:393–409Google Scholar
  7. Carterette EC, Kendall RA, DeVales S (1993) Comparative acoustical and psychoacoustical analyses of gamelan istrument tones. J Acoust Soc Jpn (E) 14(6):383–396Google Scholar
  8. Dowling WJ, Harwood DL (1986) Music cognition. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Hood M (1954) The nuclear theme as a determinant of Pathet in Javanese music. J.B. Wolters, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  10. Kendall RA (1986) The role of acoustic signal partitions in listener categorization of musical phrases. Music Percept 4(2): 185–214Google Scholar
  11. Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1990) Communication of musical expression. Music Percept 8:129–162Google Scholar
  12. Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1991) Perceptual scaling of simultaneous wind instrument timbres, Music Percept 8:369–404Google Scholar
  13. Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1992) Convergent methods in psychomusical research based on integrated, interactive computer control. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 24(2): 116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1993a) Identification and blend of timbres as abasis for orchestration. Contemp Music Rev 9:51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1993b) Verbal attributes of simultaneous wind instrument timbres. I. Von Bismarck’s adjectives. Music Percept 10(4):445–467Google Scholar
  16. Kendall RA, Carterette EC (1993c) Verbal attributes of simultaneous wind instrument timbres. II. Adjectives induced from Piston’s Orchestration. Music Percept 10(4):469–501Google Scholar
  17. Krumhansl C (1990a) Tonal hierarchies and rare intervals in music cognition. Music Percept 7(3):309Google Scholar
  18. Krumhansl C (1990b) Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunst J (1973) Music in Java: its history, its theory, and its technique, 3rd edn. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (Earlier English edition 1949; first published in Dutch as De Toonkunst von Java, 1934)Google Scholar
  20. Surjodiningrat W, Sudarjana PJ, Susanto A (1972) Tone measurements of outstanding Javanese gamelans in Jogjakarta and Surakarta, (2nd edn. Gadjah Mada University Press, JogjakartaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward C. Carterette
  • Roger A. Kendall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations