Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Das zementierte CF-Hüftendoprothesensystem

  • Chapter
Endoprothetik

  • 61 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Haltbarkeit zementierter Hüftgelenkendoprothesen hängt in hohem Maße von der Zementiertechnik ab. Diese Erkenntnis ist ein Ergebnis der jahrzehntelangen Erfahrungen auf dem Gebiet des künstlichen Gelenkersatzes. Infolge Fragmentation des Knochenzementes kann es zur Lockerung der zementierten Implantate kommen. Zweifellos beginnt ein solcher Prozeß langsam, aber ein- mal entstandene Risse breiten sich durch „crack-propagation“kontinuierlich weiter aus [3, 11, 13, 14, 16]. Die Fragmentation des Knochenzementes wird begünstigt durch Unregelmäßigkeiten und Defekte des Zementköchers, exzentrischen Sitz der Implantate und direkten Kontakt zwischen Implantat und Knochen [1, 4, 8, 10, 12, 15].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Anthony PP, Gie GA, Howie CR, Ling RSM (1990) Localized endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral component of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint [Br] 72: 971–979

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD, Jr, Harris WH (1992) Improved cement techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 74: 385–389

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaumont PWR, Young RJ (1975) Slow crack in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res 9: 423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlsson AS, Gentz CF, Lindern L (1983) Localized bone resorption in the femur in mechanical failure of cemented total hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 54: 396–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnley J (1961) Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet 1: 1129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121: 20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141: 17–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris WH, Davies JP (1988) Modern use of modern cement for total hip replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 19: 581–589

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodgkinson JP, Shelly P, Wroblewski BM (1988) The correlation between roentgenographic appearence and operative findings at the bone-cement junction of the socket in Charnley low-friction arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 228: 105–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huddlestone HD (1988) Femoral lysis after cemented hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3: 285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kusy RP, Turner DT (1974) Intergranular cracking of a weak two-phase polymethyl methacrylate. J Biomed Mater Res 8: 185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee ALC (1991) Can cementing technique affect long-term results of total hip replacement. Orthop Rel Sci 2: 208–214

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis JL (1988) The mechanical state of the bone-implant interface. In: Fitzgerald R (ed) Non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. Raven, New York, pp 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Burke DW, O’Connor DO, Zalenski EB, Bragdon C, Harris WH (1989) Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femura after in vivo cycling. Clin Orthop 249: 129–140

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maloney WJ, Jasty M, Rosenberg A, Harris WH (1990) Bone lysis in well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] Vol 72: 966–970

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller ML (1966) The structure of polymers, New York. Zitiert nach Homsy CA: Some mechanical aspects of methylmethacrylate prosthesis seating compound. In: The Hip. The Hip Society, Saint Louis 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Müller KH (1981) Lokale Komplikationen nach totalem Hiiftgelenkersatz. Unfallheil-kunde 84: 444

    Google Scholar 

  18. Müller KH (1984) Ergebnisse und Perspektiven des künstlichen Hüftgelenkersatzes in der Traumatologic. Unfallheilkunde 87: 89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mulroy RD, Jr, Harris WH (1990) The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72: 757–760

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roberts DW, Poss R, Kelly K (1986) Radiographic comparison of cementing techniques in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1: 241–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rusotti GM, Coventry MB, Stauffer RB (1988) Cemented total hip arthroplasty with contemporary techniques. A five-year minimum follow-up study. Clin Orthop 235: 141–147

    Google Scholar 

  22. Salvati EA, Wilson PD, Jr, Jolley MN, Vakili F, Aglietti P, Brown GC (1981) A ten year follow-up of our first one hundred consecutive Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 63: 753–766

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sutherland CJ, Wilde AH, Borden LS, Marks KE (1982) A ten year follow-up of one hundred consecutive Muller curved-stem total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64: 970–982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Willert HG, Puis P (1972) Die Reaktion des Knochens auf Knochenzement bei der Allo-Arthroplastik der Hüfte. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 72: 33–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Willert HG (1987) Die Zerrüttung des Zementköchers. In: Willert HG, Buchhorn G (Hrsg) Knochenzement. Werkstoff, klinische Erfahrungen, Weiterentwicklungen, Bd 31, Huber, Bern, Aktuelle Prob Chir u. Orthop S 326–333

    Google Scholar 

  26. Willert HG, Ludwig J, Semlitsch M (1974) Reactions of bone to methacrylate after hip arthroplasty: a long-term gross, light microscopic, and scanning electron microscopic study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 56: 1368–1382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Willert HG, Buchhorn G, Hess Th (1989) Die Bedeutung von Abrieb und Materialermüdung bei der Prothesenlockerung an der Hüfte. Orthopade 18: 350–369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn G (1990) Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip — The role of bone cement fragmentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 258: 108–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. H.-G. Willert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Köster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H.-P. Köhler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Felix-Platter-Spital, Burgfelderstr. 101, CH-4012, Basel, Switzerland

    E. W. Morscher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willert, HG., Köster, G., Köhler, HP. (1995). Das zementierte CF-Hüftendoprothesensystem. In: Morscher, E.W. (eds) Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79298-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79298-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79299-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79298-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation