Abstract
Clinical experience tells us that anastomotic wounds of the stomach or small intestine heal well, whereas colonic lesions are more likely to disrupt [4, 14]. Anastomoses in acute or chronic diverticulitis are thought to be especially dangerous [8, 11]. For many years now stapling techniques have proved to be efficient in restoring the continuity of the large bowel [3, 9, 12, 13]. The aim of this study was to compare biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) anastomoses [3] and stapling devices in a special high-risk group, i.e. patients undergoing an operation for diverticulitis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clemente G, Furgiuele S, Rinallo L, Zucchetti F, Bellantone R, Doglietto GB, Crucitti F (1991) Anorektale Funktion nach Sphinkter-erhaltender Karzinomresektion: Vergleich zwischen mechanischen und manuellen Anastomosen. Colo- proctology 13:82–84
Engemann R, Vogel S, Thiede A (1992) Kompressionsanastomosen mit bio- fragmentierbaren Anastomosenringen. Chir Gastroenterol 8:360–366
Fazio W et al. (1985) Evaluation of the proximate ILS circular stapler. Ann Surg 201:108–114
Foster ME et al. (1984) Leakage of low rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 27:157–159
Gullichsen R (1992) Small bowel anastomosis with the biofragmentable anasto¬mosis ring and manual suture: a prospective, randomized study. World J Surg 16:1006–1009
Kux M, Fuchsjäger N (1985) Einzeitige anteriore Resektion mit manueller Naht als Regeloperation des cranialen und mittleren Rectumdrittels. Langenbecks Arch Chir 363:283–295
Hohenberger W, Schepke P, Meier L (1981) Fehlinterpretationen bei der radiologischen Diagnose der Divertikelkrankheit. Chir Praxis 29:441–447
Hrgovic Z, Prill R (1984) Divertikelkrankheit des Dickdarms. Klin J
Lazorthes F, Chiotassol P (1986) Stapled colorectal anastomoses: perioperative integrity of the anastomosis and risk of postoperative leakage. Int J Colorect Dis 1:96–98
Lünstedt B, Debus S, Thiede A (1993) Anastomosenheilung bei verschiedenen Nahtverfahren im Gastrointestinaltrakt. Zentralbl Chir 188:1–7
Ondrula DP, Nelson RL, Prasad ML, Coyle BW, Abcarian H (1992) Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections. Dis Colon Rectum 35:117–122
Pennincx FM, Kerremans RP, Geboes KJ (1984) The healing of single- and double-row stapled circular anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 27:714–719
Scheele J, Groitl H, Pesch H-J (1984) Auto-Suture oder Handnaht? Colo- proctology VI/2
Scheele J, Herzog J, Mühe E (1978) Anastomosensicherung am Verdauungstrakt mit Fibrinkleber, nahttechnische Grundlagen, experimentelle Befunds, klinische Erfahrungen. Zbl Chir 103:1325–1336
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Husemann, B. (1995). Comparison Between Biofragmentable Anastomosis Rings and Stapling Techniques in Sigmoid Resection for Diverticulitis. In: Engemann, R., Thiede, A. (eds) Compression Anastomosis by Biofragmentable Rings. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79260-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79260-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58418-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79260-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive