Blood Purification by Hemofiltration in Septic Shock and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome Patients

  • A. F. Grootendorst
  • J. L. C. M. van Saase
Part of the Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine book series (UICM, volume 20)

Abstract

In 1984 and 1986 Gotloib et al. [1, 2] published their positive experiences with intermittent hemofiltration in muhiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) patients. The concept of blood purification by hemofiltration was received with a lot of scepticism, but nonetheless stimulated several research groups to analyze retrospective data and to perform prospective studies on this topic. Besides these chnical studies, a smah number of animal experimental studies have been performed. Undoubtedly, the high expectations with which the studies on the administration of monoclonal antibodies were welcomed as the therapy of the future diminished interest in the less prestigious hemofihration studies in MODS patients and animal models. It now seems reasonable to say that the use of monoclonals is promising and fascinating, but at the same time expensive and as yet of unproven value. The same holds for hemofiltration in this context; nonetheless, several centers have experience with this technique and use it routinely in therapy-resistant septic and cardiogenic shock. This chapter will describe the rationale for hemofiltration in shock and present an overview of the chnical and experimental studies performed so far; moreover, the limitations of the studies so far and ideas about future research wih be discussed.

Keywords

Permeability Catheter Ischemia Prostaglandin Stein 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gotloib L, Barzilay E, Shustak A et al. (1984) Sequendal hemofiltration in non-oliguric high capillary permeability pulmonary edema of severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 12:997–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gotloib L, Barzilay E, Shustak A et al. (1986) Hemofiltration in septic ARDS. The artificial kidney as an artificial lung. Resuscitation 13:123–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shoemaker WC (1987) Circulatory mechanisms of shock and their mediators. Crit Care Med 15:787–794PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bone RC (1991) The pathogenesis of sepsis. Ann Intern Med 115:457–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rackow EC, Astiz ME (1991) Pathophysiology and treatment of septic shock. JAMA 266:548–554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiddian-Green RG (1989) Studies in splanchnic ischemia and muhiple organ failure. In: Marston A, Bulkley GB, Fiddian-Green RG et al. (eds) Splanchnic ischemia and multiple organ failure. Arnold, London, pp 349–363Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pine RW, Wertz MJ, Lennard ES et al. (1983) Determinants of organ malfunction or death in patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. A discriminant analysis. Arch Surg 118:242–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knauss WA, Wagner DP (1989) MSOF: epidemiology and prognosis. Crit Care Clin 5:221–226Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knauss WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP et al. (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13:818–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoffman WD, Natanson C (1993) The role of endotoxin in bacterial septic shock. In: Vincent JL (ed) Yearbook of intensive care and emergency medicine 1993. Springer, Berhn Heidelberg New York, pp 49–63Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher C (1992) Clinical trials of immunotherapy for sepsis. Crit Care Med 20:721–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kramer P, Wigger P, Reiger J et al. (1977) Arteriovenous hemofiltradon: a new and simple method for treatment of overhydrated patients resistant to diuretics. Klin Wochenschr 55:1121–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geronemus R, Schneider N (1984) Continuous arteriovenous haemodialysis: a new treatment modality for acute renal failure. ASAIO Trans 30:610–613Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simpson HK, Allison ME, Telfer AB (1987) Improving the prognosis in acute renal and respiratory failure. Ren Fail 10:45–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weiss L, Danielson BG, Wikstrom B et al. (1987) Condnuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in the treatment of 100 critically ill patients with acute renal failure: report on clinically outcome and nutritional aspects. Clin Nephrol 31:184–189Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kramer P, Kaufhold G, Grone HJ (1980) Management of anurie intensive care patients with arteriovenous hemofiltration. Int J Artif Organs 3:225–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wendon J, Smithies M, Sheppard M et al. (1989) Continuous high volume veno-venous hemofiltration in acute renal failure. Intensive Care Med 15:358–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bellomo R, Ernest D, Love J et al. (1990) Continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration: optimal therapy for acute renal failure in an intensive care setting? Aust N Z J Med 20:237–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Voerman HJ, Strack van Schijndel RJM, Thijs LG (1990) Condnuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 18:911–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sieberth HG, Kierdorf H (1989) Is continuous hemofiltration superior to intermittent dialysis and hemofiltration treatment? Adv Exp Med Biol 260:181–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steyens PE, Davies SP, Brown EA et al. (1988) Condnuous arteriovenous haemodialysis in critically ill patients. Lancet 2:150–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Storck M, Harte WH, Zimmerer E et al. (1990) Comparison of pump-driven and spontaneous condnuous hemofiltration in postoperative acute renal failure. Lancet 337:452–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mauritz W, Sporn P, Schindler I et al. (1986) Acute renal failure in abdominal infection. Comparison of haemodialysis and continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed 21:212–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Macias WL, Mueller BA, Scarim SK et al. (1991) Continuous venovenous hemofiltration: an alternative to continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration in acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis 18:451–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Klehr HU, Kaschell HJ, Kuckenbecker CH et al. (1985) Chnical results of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. In: Sieberth HG, Mann H (eds) Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Karger, Basel, pp 159–165Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Journois D, Chanu D, Safran D (1991) Pump-driven hemofiltration (Letter). Lancet 1:985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coraim FJ, Coraim HP, Ebermann R et al. (1986) Acute respiratory failure after cardiac surgery: clinical experience with the application of continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Crit Care Med 14:714–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Coraim F, Pauser G, Stellwag F et al. (1985) Positive modification of hemodynamics in postcardiac surgery patients by hemofiltration. Improved method for the demonstration of myocardial depressant factor in hemofiltrate. Anaesthesist 34:236–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garzia F, Todor R, Scalea T (1991) Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration-counter current dialysis in acute respiratory failure. J Trauma 31:1277–1285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hirasawa H, Sugai T, Ohtake Y et al. (1991) Continuous hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration in the management of multiple organ failure. Contrib Nephrol 93:42–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bellomo R, Tipping P, Boyce N (1991) Tumor necrosis factor clearances during continuous veno-venous hemodiafihration. ASAIO Trans 37:322–323Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Staubach KH, Rau HG, Hohlbach G et al. (1987) Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration in shock: a new strategy to lower eicosanoids. Artif Organs 11:A336Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mauritz W, Sporn P, Schendler I et al. (1986) Acute renal failure in abdominal infection. Comparison of haemodialysis and continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration. Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed 21:212–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gomez A, Wang R, Unruh H et al. (1990) Hemofiltration reverses left ventricular dysfunction during sepsis in dogs. Anesthesiology 73:671–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stein B, Pfenninger E, Grunert A et al. (1990) Influence of continuous hemofiltration on hemodynamics and central blood volume in experimental endotoxic shock. Intensive Care Med 16:494–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stein B, Pfenninger E, Grunert A et al. (1991) The consequences of continuous hemofiltration on lung mechanics and extravascular lung water in a porcine endotoxic shock model. Intensive Care Med 17:293–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Grootendorst AF, van Bommel EFH, van Leengoed LAMG et al. (1994) High volume hemofiltration improves hemodynamics and survival of pigs exposed to gut ischemia and reperfusion. Shock 1:1–8Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grootendorst AF, van Bommel EFH, van der Hoven B et al. (1992) High volume hemofiltration improves right ventricular function of endotoxin induced shock in the pig. Intensive Care Med 18:235–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Grootendorst AF, van Bommel EFH, van Leengoed LAMG et al. (1993) Infusion of ultrafiltrate from endotoxemic pigs depresses myocardial performance in normal pigs. J Crit Care 8:161–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee PA, Matson JR, Pryor RW et al. (1993) Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration therapy for Staphylococcus aureus induced septicemia in immature swine. Crit Care Med 21:914–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grootendorst AF, van Bommel EFH, van Leengoed LAMG et al. (1994) High volume hemofiltration improves hemodynamics and survival of pigs exposed to bowel ischemia and reperfusion. Shock 1(5): 1–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. F. Grootendorst
  • J. L. C. M. van Saase

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations