Evidence-Based Analysis of Nutrition Support in Sepsis
Nutrition support has become a standard of care in the management of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) with or without sepsis. Much of critical care therapy has been delivered on a physician preference basis. Worldwide, there is a major effort to shift to evidence-based medical decision-making. This effort requires the evaluation of medical literature that is based on objective methodologies for evaluating the quality of the data as well as the strength of the data in promoting evidence-based medical decision-making. This technology is available today.
KeywordsPneumonia Arginine Peri Leucine Valine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Cook DJ (1994) Clinical trials in the treatment of sepsis: An evidence-based approach. See chapter by Cook in this bookGoogle Scholar
- 3.Mullen JL, Buzby GP, Matthews DC, Smale BF, Rosato EF (1980) Reduction of operative morbidity and mortality by combined preoperative and postoperative nutritional support. Ann of Surg 192: 604–613Google Scholar
- 7.Detsky AS, Baker JP, O’Rourke K, Goel V (1987) Perioperative parenteral nutrition: A meta-analysis. Am Col Phys 107: 195–203Google Scholar
- 11.Daly JM, Lieberman MD, Goldfine J, et al (1992) Enteral nutrition with supplemental arginine, RNA and omega-3 fatty acids in patients after operation. Immunologic, metabolic, and clinical outcome. Surg 112: 56–67Google Scholar
- 12.Bower RH, Lavin PT, Cerra FB, et al (1994) Early enteral administration of a formula supplemented with arginine, nucleotides and fish oils reduces length of stay of ICU patients: A randomized, prospective trial (in press)Google Scholar
- 14.Kuhl DA, Brown RO, Vehe KL, et al (1990) Use of selected visceral protein measurements in the comparison of branched-chain amino acids with standard amino acids in parenteral nutrition support of injured patients. Surg 107: 503–510Google Scholar
- 18.Cerra FB, Upson D, Angelico R, et al (1982) Branched-chains support postoperative protein synthesis. Surg 82: 192–199Google Scholar